9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Maladaptive Daydreaming, Dissociation, and the Dissociative Disorders

      research-article
      , M.D. 1 , , , M.A. 1 , , B.S. 1
      Psychiatric Research and Clinical Practice
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Studies on maladaptive daydreaming have shown that it has a number of comorbidities including dissociative disorders, yet no studies have examined the reciprocal relationship. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of maladaptive daydreaming in a sample of psychiatric inpatients with high levels of dissociation.

          Methods

          The Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES), Self‐Report Dissociative Disorders Interview Schedule, Maladaptive Daydreaming Scale‐16 (MDS‐16), Structured Clinical Interview for Maladaptive Daydreaming, and the Obsessive Compulsive Inventory were administered to a sample of 100 inpatients in a psychiatric hospital program specializing in dissociative disorders.

          Results

          Of the 100 participants, 93 reported childhood physical and/or sexual abuse, 33 met criteria for dissociative identity disorder; 56 met criteria for other specified dissociative disorder, 49 met criteria for maladaptive daydreaming disorder, and 23 met criteria for unspecified maladaptive daydreaming. The average score on the DES was 39.1 and the average score on the MDS‐16 was 33.9. Individuals with maladaptive daydreaming disorder scored significantly higher than those without on many different symptom clusters.

          Conclusions

          This sample of 100 highly traumatized and dissociative inpatients reported high levels of maladaptive daydreaming along with many other forms of comorbidity. Maladaptive daydreaming is a previously under‐recognized aspect of complex dissociative disorders and requires further attention in both research and clinical practice.

          HIGHLIGHTS

          • Individuals with maladaptive daydreaming have high levels of dissociation.

          • Inversely, individuals with dissociative disorders have high levels of maladaptive daydreaming.

          • Maladaptive daydreaming may help us understand cases of dissociative identity disorder with large numbers of ‘personalities’.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale.

          Dissociation is a lack of the normal integration of thoughts, feelings, and experiences into the stream of consciousness and memory. Dissociation occurs to some degree in normal individuals and is thought to be more prevalent in persons with major mental illnesses. The Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) has been developed to offer a means of reliably measuring dissociation in normal and clinical populations. Scale items were developed using clinical data and interviews, scales involving memory loss, and consultations with experts in dissociation. Pilot testing was performed to refine the wording and format of the scale. The scale is a 28-item self-report questionnaire. Subjects were asked to make slashes on 100-mm lines to indicate where they fall on a continuum for each question. In addition, demographic information (age, sex, occupation, and level of education) was collected so that the connection between these variables and scale scores could be examined. The mean of all item scores ranges from 0 to 100 and is called the DES score. The scale was administered to between 10 and 39 subjects in each of the following populations: normal adults, late adolescent college students, and persons suffering from alcoholism, agoraphobia, phobic-anxious disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder, schizophrenia, and multiple personality disorder. Reliability testing of the scale showed that the scale had good test-retest and good split-half reliability. Item-scale score correlations were all significant, indicating good internal consistency and construct validity. A Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc comparisons of the scores of the eight populations provided evidence of the scale's criterion-referenced validity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Multiple Comparisons Among Means

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Types of dissociation and dissociative types: A taxometric analysis of dissociative experiences.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                rossinst@rossinst.com
                Journal
                Psychiatr Res Clin Pract
                Psychiatr Res Clin Pract
                10.1176/(ISSN)2575-5609
                RCP2
                Psychiatric Research and Clinical Practice
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2575-5609
                05 October 2020
                December 2020
                : 2
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1176/rcp.v2.2 )
                : 53-61
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] The Colin A. Ross Institute for Psychological Trauma Richardson Texas
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Send correspondence to Dr. Ross ( rossinst@ 123456rossinst.com )

                Article
                RCP21010
                10.1176/appi.prcp.20190050
                9176046
                36101866
                23ff63f3-b049-419c-8e02-a695f57fa11e
                © 2020 The Authors. Psychiatric Research and Clinical Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of the American Psychiatric Association

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 08 July 2020
                : 20 November 2019
                : 03 September 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 3, Pages: 9, Words: 6347
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                December 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.6 mode:remove_FC converted:23.05.2022

                Comments

                Comment on this article