Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
219
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Rationalizing Tight Ligand Binding through Cooperative Interaction Networks

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Small modifications of the molecular structure of a ligand sometimes cause strong gains in binding affinity to a protein target, rendering a weakly active chemical series suddenly attractive for further optimization. Our goal in this study is to better rationalize and predict the occurrence of such interaction hot-spots in receptor binding sites. To this end, we introduce two new concepts into the computational description of molecular recognition. First, we take a broader view of noncovalent interactions and describe protein–ligand binding with a comprehensive set of favorable and unfavorable contact types, including for example halogen bonding and orthogonal multipolar interactions. Second, we go beyond the commonly used pairwise additive treatment of atomic interactions and use a small world network approach to describe how interactions are modulated by their environment. This approach allows us to capture local cooperativity effects and considerably improves the performance of a newly derived empirical scoring function, ScorpionScore. More importantly, however, we demonstrate how an intuitive visualization of key intermolecular interactions, interaction networks, and binding hot-spots supports the identification and rationalization of tight ligand binding.

          Related collections

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Benchmarking sets for molecular docking.

          Ligand enrichment among top-ranking hits is a key metric of molecular docking. To avoid bias, decoys should resemble ligands physically, so that enrichment is not simply a separation of gross features, yet be chemically distinct from them, so that they are unlikely to be binders. We have assembled a directory of useful decoys (DUD), with 2950 ligands for 40 different targets. Every ligand has 36 decoy molecules that are physically similar but topologically distinct, leading to a database of 98,266 compounds. For most targets, enrichment was at least half a log better with uncorrected databases such as the MDDR than with DUD, evidence of bias in the former. These calculations also allowed 40x40 cross-docking, where the enrichments of each ligand set could be compared for all 40 targets, enabling a specificity metric for the docking screens. DUD is freely available online as a benchmarking set for docking at http://blaster.docking.org/dud/.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.

            Docking is a computational technique that samples conformations of small molecules in protein binding sites; scoring functions are used to assess which of these conformations best complements the protein binding site. An evaluation of 10 docking programs and 37 scoring functions was conducted against eight proteins of seven protein types for three tasks: binding mode prediction, virtual screening for lead identification, and rank-ordering by affinity for lead optimization. All of the docking programs were able to generate ligand conformations similar to crystallographically determined protein/ligand complex structures for at least one of the targets. However, scoring functions were less successful at distinguishing the crystallographic conformation from the set of docked poses. Docking programs identified active compounds from a pharmaceutically relevant pool of decoy compounds; however, no single program performed well for all of the targets. For prediction of compound affinity, none of the docking programs or scoring functions made a useful prediction of ligand binding affinity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Motifs for molecular recognition exploiting hydrophobic enclosure in protein-ligand binding.

              The thermodynamic properties and phase behavior of water in confined regions can vary significantly from that observed in the bulk. This is particularly true for systems in which the confinement is on the molecular-length scale. In this study, we use molecular dynamics simulations and a powerful solvent analysis technique based on inhomogenous solvation theory to investigate the properties of water molecules that solvate the confined regions of protein active sites. Our simulations and analysis indicate that the solvation of protein active sites that are characterized by hydrophobic enclosure and correlated hydrogen bonds induce atypical entropic and enthalpic penalties of hydration. These penalties apparently stabilize the protein-ligand complex with respect to the independently solvated ligand and protein, which leads to enhanced binding affinities. Our analysis elucidates several challenging cases, including the super affinity of the streptavidin-biotin system.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Chem Inf Model
                ci
                jcisd8
                Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
                American Chemical Society
                1549-9596
                1549-960X
                17 November 2011
                27 December 2011
                : 51
                : 12
                : 3180-3198
                Affiliations
                []simpleDiscovery Chemistry , F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, CH-4070 Basel, Switzerland
                []simpleDesert Scientific Software Pty Ltd. , Level 5 Nexus Building, Norwest Business Park, 4 Columbia Court, Baulkham Hills, NSW, 2153, Australia
                Author notes
                [* ]For queries regarding interactions and medicinal chemistry case studies, contact Dr. Bernd Kuhn, phone: +41 616889773, e-mail: bernd.kuhn@ 123456roche.com . For queries regarding the network concepts and software details, contact Dr. Neil R. Taylor, phone: +612 8860 6466, e-mail: neil.taylor@ 123456desertsci.com .
                Article
                10.1021/ci200319e
                3246350
                22087588
                243ae3ce-c732-4359-8eea-e33d31f276d1
                Copyright © 2011 American Chemical Society

                This is an open-access article distributed under the ACS AuthorChoice Terms & Conditions. Any use of this article, must conform to the terms of that license which are available at http://pubs.acs.org.

                History
                : 12 July 2011
                : 09 December 2011
                : 27 December 2011
                : 17 November 2011
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                ci200319e
                ci-2011-00319e

                Computational chemistry & Modeling
                Computational chemistry & Modeling

                Comments

                Comment on this article