3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Development of an Accreditation Framework for Continuing Education Activities for Pharmacists

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Accreditation is the recognition that an educational activity meets certain standards. The processes for accreditation vary considerably depending on the type of activity, and currently there are differing accreditation systems in place for pharmacy continuing education (CE) across different countries. Research was carried out on a selection of these systems with the aim of developing a catalogue of accreditation approaches, and exploring the possibility of developing a common framework for the accreditation of pharmacy CE activities. Accreditation processes from the countries represented by the Global Forum on Quality Assurance of Continuing Education and Continuing Professional Development (GFQACE) were reviewed to explore the themes and patterns in them. This informed the development of a proposed accreditation framework for CE activities for pharmacists. A Delphi method over four rounds involving seven participants from each GFQACE organisation was used as a consensus building technique. Agreement was achieved on including 15 items in the framework within four stages (Input, Process, Output, and Quality Improvement). The GFQACE steering group indicated their intention to use the resultant framework as the basis for the exploration of mutual recognition of accreditation between member countries.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Delphi methodology in health research: how to do it?

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Combining qualitative and quantitative research within mixed method research designs: A methodological review

            Objectives It has been argued that mixed methods research can be useful in nursing and health science because of the complexity of the phenomena studied. However, the integration of qualitative and quantitative approaches continues to be one of much debate and there is a need for a rigorous framework for designing and interpreting mixed methods research. This paper explores the analytical approaches (i.e. parallel, concurrent or sequential) used in mixed methods studies within healthcare and exemplifies the use of triangulation as a methodological metaphor for drawing inferences from qualitative and quantitative findings originating from such analyses. Design This review of the literature used systematic principles in searching CINAHL, Medline and PsycINFO for healthcare research studies which employed a mixed methods approach and were published in the English language between January 1999 and September 2009. Results In total, 168 studies were included in the results. Most studies originated in the United States of America (USA), the United Kingdom (UK) and Canada. The analytic approach most widely used was parallel data analysis. A number of studies used sequential data analysis; far fewer studies employed concurrent data analysis. Very few of these studies clearly articulated the purpose for using a mixed methods design. The use of the methodological metaphor of triangulation on convergent, complementary, and divergent results from mixed methods studies is exemplified and an example of developing theory from such data is provided. Conclusion A trend for conducting parallel data analysis on quantitative and qualitative data in mixed methods healthcare research has been identified in the studies included in this review. Using triangulation as a methodological metaphor can facilitate the integration of qualitative and quantitative findings, help researchers to clarify their theoretical propositions and the basis of their results. This can offer a better understanding of the links between theory and empirical findings, challenge theoretical assumptions and develop new theory.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Towards a program of assessment for health professionals: from training into practice

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Pharmacy (Basel)
                Pharmacy (Basel)
                pharmacy
                Pharmacy: Journal of Pharmacy Education and Practice
                MDPI
                2226-4787
                28 April 2020
                June 2020
                : 8
                : 2
                : 75
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Irish Institute of Pharmacy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, D02 FP84 Dublin, Ireland; catrionabradley@ 123456rcsi.com
                [2 ]HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, D02 YN77 Dublin, Ireland; frankmoriarty@ 123456rcsi.ie
                [3 ]International Services Program, Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education, Chicago, IL 60603, USA; mrouse@ 123456acpe-accredit.org
                [4 ]Quality Enhancement Office, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, D02 YN77 Dublin, Ireland; dtcroke@ 123456rcsi.ie
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9838-3625
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0640-9184
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4256-6593
                Article
                pharmacy-08-00075
                10.3390/pharmacy8020075
                7356991
                32353981
                247c68ef-0cb5-43c2-92d0-bc2a28767f63
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 12 March 2020
                : 25 April 2020
                Categories
                Article

                accreditation,framework,pharmacy,continuing education,consensus

                Comments

                Comment on this article