10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Comparison of early surgery versus conventional treatment in asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation.

      Circulation
      Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Failure, etiology, Humans, Hypertension, Pulmonary, Male, Middle Aged, Mitral Valve Insufficiency, complications, mortality, surgery, Prognosis, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Rate, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Ventricular Function, Left

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The optimal timing of surgical intervention in asymptomatic patients with severe mitral regurgitation is unclear. We therefore compared the long-term results of early surgery with a conventional treatment strategy. From 1996 to 2005, 447 consecutive asymptomatic patients (253 men, age 50+/-15 years) with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation and preserved left ventricular function were evaluated prospectively. The end point was defined as the composite of operative mortality, cardiac death, repeat mitral valve surgery, and urgent admission due to congestive heart failure during follow-up. Early surgery was performed on 161 patients (operated group), and the conventional treatment strategy was used for 286 patients (conventional treatment group). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of age, gender, euroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation), or ejection fraction. During a median follow-up of 1988 days, there were 2 repeat surgeries and no cardiac deaths or operative mortality in the operated group compared with 12 cardiac deaths, 1 repeat surgery, and 22 admissions for congestive heart failure in the conventional treatment group. The estimated actuarial 7-year cardiac mortality rate was 0% in the operated group and 5+/-2% in the conventional treatment group (P=0.008), and for 127 propensity score-matched pairs, the estimated actuarial 7-year event-free survival rate was significantly higher in the operated than in the conventional treatment group (99+/-1% versus 85+/-4%, P=0.007). In the conventional treatment group, baseline grade of pulmonary hypertension (hazard ratio 1.87, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.87, P=0.003), age (hazard ratio 1.02, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.04, P=0.005), and effective regurgitant orifice area (hazard ratio 2.06, 95% CI 1.11 to 3.82, P=0.02) were independent variables that predicted late development of surgical indications or congestive heart failure on Cox multivariate analysis. Compared with conservative management, the strategy of early surgery was associated with an improved long-term event rate by decreasing cardiac mortality and congestive heart failure hospitalization more effectively in patients with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation. Early surgery may therefore further improve clinical outcomes in asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation with preserved left ventricular systolic function and a high likelihood of mitral valve repair.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article