51
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Local Challenges and Successes Associated with Transitioning to Sustainable Food System Practices for a West Australian Context: Multi-Sector Stakeholder Perceptions

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Large-scale food system practices have diminished soil and water quality and negatively impacted climate change. Yet, numerous opportunities exist to harness food system practices that will ensure better outcomes for human health and ecosystems. The objective of this study was to consider food Production, Processing, Access and Consumption domains, and for each determine the challenges and successes associated with progressing towards a sustainable food system. A workshop engaging 122 participants including producers, consultants, consumers, educators, funders, scientists, media, government and industry representatives, was conducted in Perth, Western Australia. A thematic analysis of statements (Successes ( n = 170) or Challenges ( n = 360)) captured, revealed issues of scale, knowledge and education, economics, consumerism, big food, environmental/sustainability, communication, policies and legislation, and technology and innovations. Policy recommendations included greater investment into research in sustainable agriculture (particularly the evidentiary basis for regenerative agriculture), land preservation, and supporting farmers to overcome high infrastructure costs and absorb labour costs. Policy, practice and research recommendations included focusing on an integrated food systems approach with multiple goals, food system actors working collaboratively to reduce challenges and undertaking more research to further the regenerative agriculture evidence.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book Chapter: not found

          Using Templates in the Thematic Analysis of Text

          Nigel King (2004)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Soil health in agricultural systems.

            Soil health is presented as an integrative property that reflects the capacity of soil to respond to agricultural intervention, so that it continues to support both the agricultural production and the provision of other ecosystem services. The major challenge within sustainable soil management is to conserve ecosystem service delivery while optimizing agricultural yields. It is proposed that soil health is dependent on the maintenance of four major functions: carbon transformations; nutrient cycles; soil structure maintenance; and the regulation of pests and diseases. Each of these functions is manifested as an aggregate of a variety of biological processes provided by a diversity of interacting soil organisms under the influence of the abiotic soil environment. Analysis of current models of the soil community under the impact of agricultural interventions (particularly those entailing substitution of biological processes with fossil fuel-derived energy or inputs) confirms the highly integrative pattern of interactions within each of these functions and leads to the conclusion that measurement of individual groups of organisms, processes or soil properties does not suffice to indicate the state of the soil health. A further conclusion is that quantifying the flow of energy and carbon between functions is an essential but non-trivial task for the assessment and management of soil health.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Regenerative agriculture: merging farming and natural resource conservation profitably

              Most cropland in the United States is characterized by large monocultures, whose productivity is maintained through a strong reliance on costly tillage, external fertilizers, and pesticides (Schipanski et al., 2016). Despite this, farmers have developed a regenerative model of farm production that promotes soil health and biodiversity, while producing nutrient-dense farm products profitably. Little work has focused on the relative costs and benefits of novel regenerative farming operations, which necessitates studying in situ, farmer-defined best management practices. Here, we evaluate the relative effects of regenerative and conventional corn production systems on pest management services, soil conservation, and farmer profitability and productivity throughout the Northern Plains of the United States. Regenerative farming systems provided greater ecosystem services and profitability for farmers than an input-intensive model of corn production. Pests were 10-fold more abundant in insecticide-treated corn fields than on insecticide-free regenerative farms, indicating that farmers who proactively design pest-resilient food systems outperform farmers that react to pests chemically. Regenerative fields had 29% lower grain production but 78% higher profits over traditional corn production systems. Profit was positively correlated with the particulate organic matter of the soil, not yield. These results provide the basis for dialogue on ecologically based farming systems that could be used to simultaneously produce food while conserving our natural resource base: two factors that are pitted against one another in simplified food production systems. To attain this requires a systems-level shift on the farm; simply applying individual regenerative practices within the current production model will not likely produce the documented results.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                10 June 2019
                June 2019
                : 16
                : 11
                : 2051
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Medical and Health Science, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup 6027, Australia; l.andrew@ 123456ecu.edu.au (L.A.); s.godrich@ 123456ecu.edu.au (S.G.); a.devine@ 123456ecu.edu.au (A.D.)
                [2 ]Perth Natural Resource Management, Perth 6104, Australia; justin.wolfgang@ 123456perthnrm.com
                [3 ]Commonland, 103 Amsterdam, The Netherlands; dieter.vandenbroeck@ 123456commonland.com
                [4 ]Centre for Social Impact, University of Western Australia, Crawley 6009, Australia; kathryn.dobb@ 123456uwa.edu.au
                [5 ]Faculty of Higher Education, William Angliss Institute, Melbourne 3000, Australia; nick@ 123456sustainaustralia.org
                [6 ]Sustain, The Australian Food Network, Melbourne 3000, Australia
                [7 ]Geography and Environment, University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, BC V2S 7M8, Canada; Lenore.Newman@ 123456ufv.ca
                [8 ]Centre for Ecosystem Management, School of Science, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup 6027, Australia; p.horwitz@ 123456ecu.edu.au
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: r.sambell@ 123456ecu.edu.au ; Tel.: +61-08-6304-5424
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8799-3441
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3067-8253
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8689-7888
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6978-6249
                Article
                ijerph-16-02051
                10.3390/ijerph16112051
                6603997
                31185621
                24ad85f9-284a-4e25-8834-4375773f88e7
                © 2019 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 09 May 2019
                : 06 June 2019
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                food system,food security,sustainable agriculture,regenerative agriculture,food system actors,challenges,successes,food supply

                Comments

                Comment on this article