11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Urolithin A analog inhibits castration-resistant prostate cancer by targeting the androgen receptor and its variant, androgen receptor-variant 7

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We investigated the efficacy of a small molecule ASR-600, an analog of Urolithin A (Uro A), on blocking androgen receptor (AR) and its splice variant AR-variant 7 (AR-V7) signaling in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). ASR-600 effectively suppressed the growth of AR + CRPC cells by inhibiting AR and AR-V7 expressions; no effect was seen in AR CRPC and normal prostate epithelial cells. Biomolecular interaction assays revealed ASR-600 binds to the N-terminal domain of AR, which was further confirmed by immunoblot and subcellular localization studies. Molecular studies suggested that ASR-600 promotes the ubiquitination of AR and AR-V7 resulting in the inhibition of AR signaling. Microsomal and plasma stability studies suggest that ASR-600 is stable, and its oral administration inhibits tumor growth in CRPC xenografted castrated and non-castrated mice. In conclusion, our data suggest that ASR-600 enhances AR ubiquitination in both AR + and AR-V7 CRPC cells and inhibits their growth in vitro and in vivo models.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The I-TASSER Suite: protein structure and function prediction.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Molecular determinants of resistance to antiandrogen therapy.

            Using microarray-based profiling of isogenic prostate cancer xenograft models, we found that a modest increase in androgen receptor mRNA was the only change consistently associated with the development of resistance to antiandrogen therapy. This increase in androgen receptor mRNA and protein was both necessary and sufficient to convert prostate cancer growth from a hormone-sensitive to a hormone-refractory stage, and was dependent on a functional ligand-binding domain. Androgen receptor antagonists showed agonistic activity in cells with increased androgen receptor levels; this antagonist-agonist conversion was associated with alterations in the recruitment of coactivators and corepressors to the promoters of androgen receptor target genes. Increased levels of androgen receptor confer resistance to antiandrogens by amplifying signal output from low levels of residual ligand, and by altering the normal response to antagonists. These findings provide insight toward the design of new antiandrogens.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Abiraterone and increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer.

              Biosynthesis of extragonadal androgen may contribute to the progression of castration-resistant prostate cancer. We evaluated whether abiraterone acetate, an inhibitor of androgen biosynthesis, prolongs overall survival among patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who have received chemotherapy. We randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, 1195 patients who had previously received docetaxel to receive 5 mg of prednisone twice daily with either 1000 mg of abiraterone acetate (797 patients) or placebo (398 patients). The primary end point was overall survival. The secondary end points included time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression (elevation in the PSA level according to prespecified criteria), progression-free survival according to radiologic findings based on prespecified criteria, and the PSA response rate. After a median follow-up of 12.8 months, overall survival was longer in the abiraterone acetate-prednisone group than in the placebo-prednisone group (14.8 months vs. 10.9 months; hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.54 to 0.77; P<0.001). Data were unblinded at the interim analysis, since these results exceeded the preplanned criteria for study termination. All secondary end points, including time to PSA progression (10.2 vs. 6.6 months; P<0.001), progression-free survival (5.6 months vs. 3.6 months; P<0.001), and PSA response rate (29% vs. 6%, P<0.001), favored the treatment group. Mineralocorticoid-related adverse events, including fluid retention, hypertension, and hypokalemia, were more frequently reported in the abiraterone acetate-prednisone group than in the placebo-prednisone group. The inhibition of androgen biosynthesis by abiraterone acetate prolonged overall survival among patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who previously received chemotherapy. (Funded by Cougar Biotechnology; COU-AA-301 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00638690.).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Pharmacol
                Front Pharmacol
                Front. Pharmacol.
                Frontiers in Pharmacology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1663-9812
                03 March 2023
                2023
                : 14
                : 1137783
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Department of Pharmaceutical Science , College of Pharmacy , Texas A&M University , College Station, TX, United States
                [2] 2 Department of Urology , University of Louisville , Louisville, KY, United States
                [3] 3 Department of Pharmacology , Penn State Cancer Institute , Penn State College of Medicine , Hershey, PA, United States
                [4] 4 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology , Penn State College of Medicine , Hershey, PA, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Eswar Shankar, The Ohio State University, United States

                Reviewed by: Prem P. Kushwaha, Case Western Reserve University, United States

                Yong Li, Baylor College of Medicine, United States

                Jayadev Joshi, Cleveland Clinic, United States

                Vinata Lokeshwar, Augusta University, United States

                *Correspondence: Chendil Damodaran, chendamodar@ 123456tamu.edu
                [ † ]

                These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

                This article was submitted to Pharmacology of Anti-Cancer Drugs, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology

                Article
                1137783
                10.3389/fphar.2023.1137783
                10020188
                36937838
                2514f8c2-853b-4c25-b930-0f5737d66b34
                Copyright © 2023 Chandrasekaran, Tyagi, Saran, Kolluru, Baby, Chirasani, Dokholyan, Lin, Singh, Sharma, Ankem and Damodaran.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 04 January 2023
                : 08 February 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: National Cancer Institute , doi 10.13039/100000054;
                Award ID: R01 CA 257370
                Funded by: National Institute of General Medical Sciences , doi 10.13039/100000057;
                Funded by: National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences , doi 10.13039/100006108;
                We acknowledge support from the National Institutes for Health, RO1 CA 257370 to CD, AKS, 1R35 GM134864 to ND and the Passan Foundation. The project described was also supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through Grant UL1 TR002014.
                Categories
                Pharmacology
                Original Research

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                crpc,androgen receptor,ar-splice variants,n-terminal domain,small molecule,growth inhibition

                Comments

                Comment on this article