19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Pharmacokinetic drug evaluation of ulipristal acetate for the treatment of uterine fibroids

      1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2
      Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology
      Informa UK Limited

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Uterine fibroids are the most common form of benign gynecological tumors in women of reproductive ages. Although surgery is the main option to treat them, alternative pharmacological approaches are being investigated to control their symptoms. Among them, ulipristal acetate (UPA) has been the first selective progesterone-receptor modulator (SPRM) approved for the pre-operative and long-term treatment of uterine fibroids. Areas covered: The aim of this article is to review the literature on the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics (PK), clinical efficacy and safety of UPA for the treatment of uterine fibroids. Expert opinion: UPA has both agonistic and antagonistic activity on progesterone receptor. Results from PK studies have shown that it has good oral bioavailability, and that it is extensively metabolized in the liver by cytochrome (CYP) 3A4. The PEARL I-II showed that the preoperative treatment with UPA decreases uterine bleeding, uterine volume and fibroid size in women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas. The PEARL III and IV trials demonstrated the efficacy and safety of long-term intermittent treatment with UPA for the control of fibroid-related symptoms.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Epidemiology of uterine fibroids: a systematic review

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Assessment of menstrual blood loss using a pictorial chart.

            Objective menstrual blood loss measurements (in ml) were compared with the score obtained from a pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC) which took into account the degree to which each item of sanitary protection was soiled with blood as well as the total number of pads or tampons used. Twenty eight women used the chart during 55 menstrual cycles and a single observer assessed 122 cycle collections in a similar manner. A pictorial chart score of 100 or more, when used as a diagnostic test for menorrhagia, was found to have a specificity and sensitivity of greater than 80%. Demonstration of the relation between self assessed pictorial chart scores and the objective measurement of blood loss enables us to provide a simple, cheap and reasonably accurate method of assessing blood loss before embarking upon treatment.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Progesterone action in endometrial cancer, endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and breast cancer.

              Progesterone receptor (PR) mediates the actions of the ovarian steroid progesterone, which together with estradiol regulates gonadotropin secretion, prepares the endometrium for implantation, maintains pregnancy, and differentiates breast tissue. Separation of estrogen and progesterone actions in hormone-responsive tissues remains a challenge. Pathologies of the uterus and breast, including endometrial cancer, endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and breast cancer, are highly associated with estrogen, considered to be the mitogenic factor. Emerging evidence supports distinct roles of progesterone and its influence on the pathogenesis of these diseases. Progesterone antagonizes estrogen-driven growth in the endometrium, and insufficient progesterone action strikingly increases the risk of endometrial cancer. In endometriosis, eutopic and ectopic tissues do not respond sufficiently to progesterone and are considered to be progesterone-resistant, which contributes to proliferation and survival. In uterine fibroids, progesterone promotes growth by increasing proliferation, cellular hypertrophy, and deposition of extracellular matrix. In normal mammary tissue and breast cancer, progesterone is pro-proliferative and carcinogenic. A key difference between these tissues that could explain the diverse effects of progesterone is the paracrine interactions of PR-expressing stroma and epithelium. Normal endometrium is a mucosa containing large quantities of distinct stromal cells with abundant PR, which influences epithelial cell proliferation and differentiation and protects against carcinogenic transformation. In contrast, the primary target cells of progesterone in the breast and fibroids are the mammary epithelial cells and the leiomyoma cells, which lack specifically organized stromal components with significant PR expression. This review provides a unifying perspective for the diverse effects of progesterone across human tissues and diseases.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology
                Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology
                Informa UK Limited
                1742-5255
                1744-7607
                December 15 2017
                January 02 2018
                December 20 2017
                January 02 2018
                : 14
                : 1
                : 107-116
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
                [2 ] Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
                [3 ] Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Sciences, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
                Article
                10.1080/17425255.2018.1417389
                29250979
                253212e3-24ab-4dbc-bdbf-6502f551747e
                © 2018
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article