10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Audiologic and Temporal Bone Imaging Findings in Patients With Sensorineural Hearing Loss and GJB2 Mutations

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives/Hypothesis:

          Our objectives were to determine genotype-phenotype correlations in patients with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) who undergo testing for GJB2 mutations and to examine the relationship of temporal bone anomalies seen on computed tomography (CT) and GJB2 mutations.

          Study design:

          We conducted a retrospective review of all children diagnosed with SNHL and who underwent GJB2 testing from 1997 to 2006.

          Results:

          Of 840 patients, 146 (17.4%) had mutations. Seventy-six (9.1%) had biallelic GJB2 mutations and 70 (8.3%) had heterozygous mutations. When biallelic mutations were categorized as missense or nonsense mutations, the presence of at least one missense mutation was associated with mild or moderate SNHL. Biallelic nonsense mutations were associated with severe to profound SNHL. Among patients with GJB2 mutations, those with heterozygous mutations (n = 14 [20%]) had a higher rate of asymmetric SNHL loss than those with biallelic mutations (n = 6 [7.9%], P = .03). Those with heterozygous mutations were more likely to experience progression than were those with biallelic mutations, though this difference was only marginally significant (26.5% vs. 12.3%, respectively; P = .06). Patients who were wild type for GJB2 were more likely to have an enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) than were those with biallelic and heterozygous mutations (29% vs. 11.9%, respectively; P = .004). Compared to patients who were wild type, those with biallelic mutations had a significantly lower rate of EVA.

          Conclusions:

          This is the largest single-institution study of pediatric patients with GJB2 mutations and SNHL. The functional consequences of GJB2 mutations correlated with the degree of hearing loss. Patients with M34T mutations and/or mild SNHL had a low risk of progression. Temporal bone anomalies were uncommon in patients with GJB2 mutations.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          8607378
          5476
          Laryngoscope
          Laryngoscope
          The Laryngoscope
          0023-852X
          1531-4995
          21 February 2020
          March 2009
          11 March 2020
          : 119
          : 3
          : 554-558
          Affiliations
          Hearing and Deafness Center, Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center (K.H.L., G.S., B.R., A.P.C., D.C., J.M.-D., J.H.G.), Department of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine (D.C., J.M.-D., J.H.G.), University of Cincinnati College of Medicine (D.A.L.), and Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center (C.B., M.H., J.M.-D.), Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A.
          Author notes

          Editor’s Note: This Manuscript was accepted for publication October 16, 2008.

          Send correspondence to John H. Greinwald, Jr., MD, FAAP, Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 2018, Cincinnati, OH 45229. John.Greinwald@ 123456cchmc.org
          Article
          PMC7065710 PMC7065710 7065710 nihpa1562524
          10.1002/lary.20162
          7065710
          19235794
          25962f48-5a9d-49dd-a4b9-42ef91bc7037
          History
          Categories
          Article

          temporal bone anomalies,GJB2,mild,progressive,and asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss

          Comments

          Comment on this article