4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An Integrated Quantitative Proteomics Workflow for Cancer Biomarker Discovery and Validation in Plasma

      methods-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Blood plasma is one of the most widely used samples for cancer biomarker discovery research as well as clinical investigations for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. However, the plasma proteome is extremely complex due to its wide dynamic range of protein concentrations and the presence of high-abundance proteins. Here we have described an optimized, integrated quantitative proteomics pipeline combining the label-free and multiplexed-labeling-based (iTRAQ and TMT) plasma proteome profiling methods for biomarker discovery, followed by the targeted approaches for validation of the identified potential marker proteins. In this workflow, the targeted quantitation of proteins is carried out by multiple-reaction monitoring (MRM) and parallel-reaction monitoring (PRM) mass spectrometry. Thus, our approach enables both unbiased screenings of biomarkers and their subsequent selective validation in human plasma. The overall procedure takes only ~2 days to complete, including the time for data acquisition (excluding database searching). This protocol is quick, flexible, and eliminates the need for a separate immunoassay-based validation workflow in blood cancer biomarker investigations. We anticipate that this plasma proteomics workflow will help to accelerate the cancer biomarker discovery program and provide a valuable resource to the cancer research community.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents.

          We describe here a multiplexed protein quantitation strategy that provides relative and absolute measurements of proteins in complex mixtures. At the core of this methodology is a multiplexed set of isobaric reagents that yield amine-derivatized peptides. The derivatized peptides are indistinguishable in MS, but exhibit intense low-mass MS/MS signature ions that support quantitation. In this study, we have examined the global protein expression of a wild-type yeast strain and the isogenic upf1Delta and xrn1Delta mutant strains that are defective in the nonsense-mediated mRNA decay and the general 5' to 3' decay pathways, respectively. We also demonstrate the use of 4-fold multiplexing to enable relative protein measurements simultaneously with determination of absolute levels of a target protein using synthetic isobaric peptide standards. We find that inactivation of Upf1p and Xrn1p causes common as well as unique effects on protein expression.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The human plasma proteome: history, character, and diagnostic prospects.

            The human plasma proteome holds the promise of a revolution in disease diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring provided that major challenges in proteomics and related disciplines can be addressed. Plasma is not only the primary clinical specimen but also represents the largest and deepest version of the human proteome present in any sample: in addition to the classical "plasma proteins," it contains all tissue proteins (as leakage markers) plus very numerous distinct immunoglobulin sequences, and it has an extraordinary dynamic range in that more than 10 orders of magnitude in concentration separate albumin and the rarest proteins now measured clinically. Although the restricted dynamic range of conventional proteomic technology (two-dimensional gels and mass spectrometry) has limited its contribution to the list of 289 proteins (tabulated here) that have been reported in plasma to date, very recent advances in multidimensional survey techniques promise at least double this number in the near future. Abundant scientific evidence, from proteomics and other disciplines, suggests that among these are proteins whose abundances and structures change in ways indicative of many, if not most, human diseases. Nevertheless, only a handful of proteins are currently used in routine clinical diagnosis, and the rate of introduction of new protein tests approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has paradoxically declined over the last decade to less than one new protein diagnostic marker per year. We speculate on the reasons behind this large discrepancy between the expectations arising from proteomics and the realities of clinical diagnostics and suggest approaches by which protein-disease associations may be more effectively translated into diagnostic tools in the future.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Selected reaction monitoring-based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions.

              Selected reaction monitoring (SRM) is a targeted mass spectrometry technique that is emerging in the field of proteomics as a complement to untargeted shotgun methods. SRM is particularly useful when predetermined sets of proteins, such as those constituting cellular networks or sets of candidate biomarkers, need to be measured across multiple samples in a consistent, reproducible and quantitatively precise manner. Here we describe how SRM is applied in proteomics, review recent advances, present selected applications and provide a perspective on the future of this powerful technology.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Oncol
                Front Oncol
                Front. Oncol.
                Frontiers in Oncology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2234-943X
                23 September 2020
                2020
                : 10
                : 543997
                Affiliations
                Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay , Mumbai, India
                Author notes

                Edited by: Suman S. Thakur, Center for Cellular & Molecular Biology (CCMB), India

                Reviewed by: Jean-Charles Sanchez, Université de Genève, Switzerland; Paul Townsend, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom; Edouard Nice, Monash University, Australia

                *Correspondence: Sanjeeva Srivastava sanjeeva@ 123456iitb.ac.in

                This article was submitted to Molecular and Cellular Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology

                †Present address: Sandipan Ray, Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States

                Article
                10.3389/fonc.2020.543997
                7538778
                33072574
                25dc35ac-18f5-4862-9889-d22b7cd2e56c
                Copyright © 2020 Kumar, Ray, Ghantasala and Srivastava.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 19 March 2020
                : 17 August 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 54, Pages: 14, Words: 8309
                Funding
                Funded by: Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development 10.13039/501100013391
                Award ID: #34_IITB (2016)
                Categories
                Oncology
                Methods

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                cancer biomarker,multiplexed quantitative proteomics,targeted proteomics,label-free quantitation,multiple reaction monitoring,parallel reaction monitoring

                Comments

                Comment on this article