0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Laser versus Anti-VEGF: A Paradigm Shift for Treatment-Warranted Retinopathy of Prematurity

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), a leading cause of childhood blindness, has historically been associated with blindness from overgrowth of blood vessels from the retina into the vitreous that lead to complex retinal detachments. Our understanding of ROP has evolved with the survival of extremely low-birthweight infants and includes not only overgrowth of blood vessels, but also insufficient developmental retinal vascular growth in early phases of the disease. Our current treatments of ROP have focused on methods to improve perinatal and prenatal care, reduce premature birth, and prevent early phases of ROP. Nonetheless, addressing vasoproliferation in treatment-warranted eyes remains the mainstay of management. Two main treatment strategies co-exist today: laser treatment, which has been the standard of care since the 1990s, and anti-VEGF injections, which have been used since early reports in 2007 (Travassos et al. in Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging, 38:233–237, 10.3928/15428877-20070501-09, 2007, Shah et al. in Indian J Ophthalmol 55:75–76, 10.4103/0301-4738.29505, 2007, Quiroz-Mercado et al. in Semin Ophthalmol 22:109–125, 10.1080/08820530701420082, 2007).

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis

          Summary Background Preterm birth is the leading cause of death in children younger than 5 years worldwide. Although preterm survival rates have increased in high-income countries, preterm newborns still die because of a lack of adequate newborn care in many low-income and middle-income countries. We estimated global, regional, and national rates of preterm birth in 2014, with trends over time for some selected countries. Methods We systematically searched for data on preterm birth for 194 WHO Member States from 1990 to 2014 in databases of national civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS). We also searched for population-representative surveys and research studies for countries with no or limited CRVS data. For 38 countries with high-quality data for preterm births in 2014, data are reported directly. For countries with at least three data points between 1990 and 2014, we used a linear mixed regression model to estimate preterm birth rates. We also calculated regional and global estimates of preterm birth for 2014. Findings We identified 1241 data points across 107 countries. The estimated global preterm birth rate for 2014 was 10·6% (uncertainty interval 9·0–12·0), equating to an estimated 14·84 million (12·65 million–16·73 million) live preterm births in 2014. 12· 0 million (81·1%) of these preterm births occurred in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Regional preterm birth rates for 2014 ranged from 13·4% (6·3–30·9) in North Africa to 8·7% (6·3–13·3) in Europe. India, China, Nigeria, Bangladesh, and Indonesia accounted for 57·9 million (41×4%) of 139·9 million livebirths and 6·6 million (44×6%) of preterm births globally in 2014. Of the 38 countries with high-quality data, preterm birth rates have increased since 2000 in 26 countries and decreased in 12 countries. Globally, we estimated that the preterm birth rate was 9×8% (8×3–10×9) in 2000, and 10×6% (9×0–12×0) in 2014. Interpretation Preterm birth remains a crucial issue in child mortality and improving quality of maternal and newborn care. To better understand the epidemiology of preterm birth, the quality and volume of data needs to be improved, including standardisation of definitions, measurement, and reporting. Funding WHO and the March of Dimes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab for stage 3+ retinopathy of prematurity.

            Retinopathy of prematurity is a leading cause of childhood blindness worldwide. Peripheral retinal ablation with conventional (confluent) laser therapy is destructive, causes complications, and does not prevent all vision loss, especially in cases of retinopathy of prematurity affecting zone I of the eye. Case series in which patients were treated with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors suggest that these agents may be useful in treating retinopathy of prematurity. We conducted a prospective, controlled, randomized, stratified, multicenter trial to assess intravitreal bevacizumab monotherapy for zone I or zone II posterior stage 3+ (i.e., stage 3 with plus disease) retinopathy of prematurity. Infants were randomly assigned to receive intravitreal bevacizumab (0.625 mg in 0.025 ml of solution) or conventional laser therapy, bilaterally. The primary ocular outcome was recurrence of retinopathy of prematurity in one or both eyes requiring retreatment before 54 weeks' postmenstrual age. We enrolled 150 infants (total sample of 300 eyes); 143 infants survived to 54 weeks' postmenstrual age, and the 7 infants who died were not included in the primary-outcome analyses. Retinopathy of prematurity recurred in 4 infants in the bevacizumab group (6 of 140 eyes [4%]) and 19 infants in the laser-therapy group (32 of 146 eyes [22%], P=0.002). A significant treatment effect was found for zone I retinopathy of prematurity (P=0.003) but not for zone II disease (P=0.27). Intravitreal bevacizumab monotherapy, as compared with conventional laser therapy, in infants with stage 3+ retinopathy of prematurity showed a significant benefit for zone I but not zone II disease. Development of peripheral retinal vessels continued after treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab, but conventional laser therapy led to permanent destruction of the peripheral retina. This trial was too small to assess safety. (Funded by Research to Prevent Blindness and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00622726.).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Mechanisms and management of retinopathy of prematurity.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                me.hartnett@stanford.edu
                andreas.stahl@med.uni-greifswald.de
                Journal
                Ophthalmol Ther
                Ophthalmol Ther
                Ophthalmology and Therapy
                Springer Healthcare (Cheshire )
                2193-8245
                2193-6528
                19 June 2023
                19 June 2023
                October 2023
                : 12
                : 5
                : 2241-2252
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.168010.e, ISNI 0000000419368956, Byers Eye Institute at Stanford University, , Stanford University, ; 2452 Watson Court, Palo Alto, CA 94303 USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.5603.0, Chair for Ophthalmology, , University Medicine Greifswald, Germany, ; Ferdinand Sauerbruch Strasse, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
                Article
                744
                10.1007/s40123-023-00744-7
                10442041
                37337024
                27756009-544e-4f55-a17b-355ec1db6446
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 11 April 2023
                : 23 May 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100001818, Research to Prevent Blindness;
                Award ID: unrestricted
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000053, National Eye Institute;
                Award ID: R01 EY015130
                Award ID: R01 EY017011
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100009109, Pharmaceuticals Bayer;
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008792, Novartis Pharma;
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Healthcare Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

                vitreoretinal surgery,laser,anti-vegf,retinopathy of prematurity,rop

                Comments

                Comment on this article