Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Extended regimen of a levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol transdermal delivery system: Predicted serum hormone levels using a population pharmacokinetic model

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          This study employed population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models to predict levonorgestrel (LNG) and ethinyl estradiol (EE) exposure after dosing with the transdermal contraceptive TWIRLA ® (LNG/EE TDS) as a 12-week extended regimen in a healthy female population.

          Methods

          PopPK models were developed using data from a previously published phase 1, open-label, randomized clinical trial, ATI-CL14 (NCT01243580), in 36 healthy individuals. Models used cycle 2 data from 18 individuals who received the LNG/EE TDS, delivering LNG 120 μg/day and EE 30 μg/day, followed by a 1-week TDS-free period. Noncompartmental PK analyses were performed on simulated concentration–time profiles of 12 consecutive weeks of LNG/EE TDS use.

          Results

          The simulated concentration–time profiles and PK parameters for the simulated extended regimen indicated that predicted LNG and EE exposures at week 12 were similar to week 3 (predicted geometric mean EE area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 168 h [AUC 0-168] on week 3 was 0.2% lower than week 12 and LNG AUC 0-168 on week 3 was 0.9% lower than week 12), suggesting both were at steady state by week 3. Therefore, no notable accumulation beyond that at week 3 is predicted for LNG and EE following a 12-week extended regimen. The results are supported by the accumulation ratios based on maximum concentration and the area under the curve being similar at weeks 3 and 12 for LNG and EE.

          Conclusion

          These results indicate that a 12-week extended LNG/EE regimen would provide similar systemic hormonal exposure as that seen by week 3 in a standard 28-day regimen, without further hormonal accumulation. The data support the safe use of a non-daily, low-dose hormonal contraceptive in an extended regimen but should be confirmed in a clinical PK study.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred frequency and characteristics of menstrual bleeding in relation to reproductive status, oral contraceptive use, and hormone replacement therapy use.

          This study addresses attitudes towards changes in menstrual bleeding patterns caused by oral contraceptives (OC) or hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and preferred changes in bleeding pattern with and without use of OC or HRT in relation to reproductive age group. Data were collected by means of telephone interviews with 325 women in each of four age groups (15-19, 25-34, 45-49, and 52-57 years). In total, 80.5% of currently menstruating women preferred one or more changes in bleeding pattern such as less painful, shorter, or less heavy periods, or amenorrhea. The majority of the menstruating women in all age groups preferred to have a bleeding frequency of less than once a month or never, whether the bleeding was spontaneous or induced by OC. In the case of HRT, amenorrhea was most preferred. These findings with respect to preferred bleeding frequency and OC may have important implications for health care providers and for future contraception development.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Women's and providers' attitudes toward menstrual suppression with extended use of oral contraceptives.

            The United States Food and Drug Administration approved a dedicated extended regimen of oral contraceptive (OC) pill in the fall of 2003. Few studies have explored how women or providers feel about menstrual suppression. This study describes women's and providers' attitudes toward menstrual suppression. A national sample of 1470 women and 512 providers responded to surveys asking about attitudes toward menstrual suppression. Seventy-eight percent of the women sample had never heard of menstrual suppression with OCs. Fifty-nine percent of women would be interested in not menstruating every month and one third would choose never to have a period. Only 7% of the providers thought it was physically necessary to have a period every month and 44% thought that menstrual suppression is a good idea. While 57% of providers said that their patients do not ask about extended use of OCs, 52% do prescribe them; patient request was the most common reason. Both samples thought that more research should be conducted and that the factors that would influence their decisions included long-term health effects, side effects, future fertility and cost. Results demonstrate that providers need to discuss this option with their patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Adherence to the oral contraceptive pill: a cross-sectional survey of modifiable behavioural determinants

              Background Poor adherence to the oral contraceptive pill (OCP) is reported as one of the main causes of unintended pregnancy in women that rely on this form of contraception. This study aims to estimate the associations between a range of well-established modifiable psychological factors and adherence to OCP. Method A cross-sectional survey of 130 female University students currently using OCP (Mean age: 20.46 SD: 3.01, range 17–36) was conducted. An OCP specific Medication Adherence Report Scale was used to assess non-adherence. Psychological predictor measures included necessity and concern beliefs about OCP, intentions, perceived behavioural control (pbc), anticipated regret and action and coping planning. Multiple linear regression was used to analyse the data. Results Fifty-two per cent of participants reported missing their OCP once or more per month and 14% twice or more per month. In bivariate analysis intentions (r = −0.25), perceived behavioural control (r= −0.66), anticipated regret (r=0.20), concerns about OCP (r =0.31), and action (r= −0.25) and coping (r= −0.28) planning were all significantly associated with adherence to OCP in the predicted direction. In a multivariate model almost half (48%) of the variation in OCP adherence could be explained. The strongest and only statistically significant predictors in this model were perceived behavioural control (β=−0.62, p<0.01) and coping planning (β =−0.23, p=0.03). A significant interaction between intentions and anticipated regret was also observed. Conclusion The present data point to a number of key modifiable psychological determinants of OCP use. Future work will establish whether changing these variables results in better adherence to the OCP.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                PLOS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                27 December 2022
                2022
                : 17
                : 12
                : e0279640
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
                [2 ] Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, United States of America
                [3 ] Nuventra, LLC, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
                [4 ] Agile Therapeutics, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America
                Public Library of Science, UNITED KINGDOM
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: Competing interests FZS: Consultant: Agile Therapeutics. DFA: Consultant: Agile Therapeutics, Bayer Healthcare, Exeltis, Mithra, Lupin, ObsEva; Grants: Bayer Healthcare, Dare Biosciences, Estetra, Myovant, ObsEva; Honoraria: Exeltis; Patent: pending; Member: DSMB; Board member: Diczfalusy foundation; Stock ownership: InnovaGyn Inc, Agile Therapeutics LRLL: Consultant: Agile Therapeutics. JP: Consultant: Agile Therapeutics. MP: Employee: Agile Therapeutics; Stock ownership: Agile Therapeutics. PK: Employee: Agile Therapeutics; Consultant: Voltron Therapeutics; Independent board director: Voltron Therapeutics; Support for business-related travel: Agile Therapeutics; Stipend: Laidlaw Venture Partners LLC Investment and Operations Committee; Stock ownership: Agile Therapeutics, Voltron Therapeutics.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3607-121X
                Article
                PONE-D-22-16688
                10.1371/journal.pone.0279640
                9794042
                36574387
                28667923-4c93-40c2-b171-1780fbfcf7e6
                © 2022 Stanczyk et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 9 June 2022
                : 6 December 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Pages: 12
                Funding
                Funded by: Agile Therapeutics, Inc.
                This study was funded by Agile Therapeutics, Inc., Princeton, NJ. Medical writing was provided by Chameleon Communications, New York, NY and was funded by Agile Therapeutics, Inc. Agile Therapeutics, Inc., provided a full review of the article and had a role in the design, execution, data collection and analysis, reporting, and funding of the study.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Obstetrics and Gynecology
                Contraception
                Female Contraception
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Simulation and Modeling
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pharmacology
                Pharmacokinetics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Hormones
                Lipid Hormones
                Estradiol
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pharmaceutics
                Drug Therapy
                Contraceptive Therapy
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Maternal Health
                Pregnancy
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Obstetrics and Gynecology
                Pregnancy
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pharmaceutics
                Drug Therapy
                Contraceptive Therapy
                Oral Contraceptive Therapy
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pharmaceutics
                Dose Prediction Methods
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article