Seeding of a Pituitary Adenoma or Atypical Pituitary Carcinoma?

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Pituitary carcinomas are defined as pituitary tumors with craniospinal and/or systemic metastasis. These are rare and highly aggressive lesions. We present an unusual case of a 52-year-old male who had a pituitary adenoma removed via craniotomy. The tumor recurred three years post-op near the surgical tract, and slowly enlarged before removal two years later. Technically, this lesion was defined as a pituitary carcinoma, even though the histology and clinical course were atypical. There is no standardized grading system for pituitary tumors and ideal criteria should correlate clinically. Treatment for pituitary carcinoma is multimodal and largely empiric. We believe this case illustrates that current definitions of pituitary carcinoma are incomplete.

Related collections

Most cited references 10

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

A new prognostic clinicopathological classification of pituitary adenomas: a multicentric case-control study of 410 patients with 8 years post-operative follow-up.

Jacqueline Trouillas, Pascal Roy, Nathalie Sturm … (2013)

Pituitary adenomas are currently classified by histological, immunocytochemical and numerous ultrastructural characteristics lacking unequivocal prognostic correlations. We investigated the prognostic value of a new clinicopathological classification with grades based on invasion and proliferation. This retrospective multicentric case-control study comprised 410 patients who had surgery for a pituitary tumour with long-term follow-up. Using pituitary magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of cavernous or sphenoid sinus invasion, immunocytochemistry, markers of the cell cycle (Ki-67, mitoses) and p53, tumours were classified according to size (micro, macro and giant), type (PRL, GH, FSH/LH, ACTH and TSH) and grade (grade 1a: non-invasive, 1b: non-invasive and proliferative, 2a: invasive, 2b: invasive and proliferative, and 3: metastatic). The association between patient status at 8-year follow-up and age, sex, and classification was evaluated by two multivariate analyses assessing disease- or recurrence/progression-free status. At 8 years after surgery, 195 patients were disease-free (controls) and 215 patients were not (cases). In 125 of the cases the tumours had recurred or progressed. Analyses of disease-free and recurrence/progression-free status revealed the significant prognostic value (p < 0.001; p < 0.05) of age, tumour type, and grade across all tumour types and for each tumour type. Invasive and proliferative tumours (grade 2b) had a poor prognosis with an increased probability of tumour persistence or progression of 25- or 12-fold, respectively, as compared to non-invasive tumours (grade 1a). This new, easy to use clinicopathological classification of pituitary endocrine tumours has demonstrated its prognostic worth by strongly predicting the probability of post-operative complete remission or tumour progression and so could help clinicians choose the best post-operative therapy.

0 comments Cited 139 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Risk of second brain tumor after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for pituitary adenoma: update after an additional 10 years.

A Gonsalves, D Traish, G. Minniti … (2005)

We assessed the risk of second brain tumors in a cohort of patients with pituitary adenoma treated with conservative surgery and external beam radiotherapy. Four hundred and twenty-six patients (United Kingdom residents) with pituitary adenomas received radiotherapy at the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) between 1962 and 1994. They were followed up for 5749 person-years. The cumulative incidence of second intracranial tumors and systemic malignancy was compared with population incidence rates through the Thames Cancer Registry and the National Health Service Central Register (previously OPCS) to record death and the potential causes. Eleven patients developed a second brain tumor, including five meningiomas, four high grade astrocytomas, one meningeal sarcoma, and one primitive neuroectodermal tumor. The cumulative risk of second brain tumors was 2.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.9-4.4%] at 10 yr and 2.4% (95% CI, 1.2-5.0%) at 20 yr, measured from the date of radiotherapy. The relative risk of second brain tumor compared with the incidence in the normal population was 10.5 (95% CI, 4.3-16.7). The relative risk was 7.0 for neuroepithelial and 24.3 for meningeal tumors. The relative risks were 24.2 (95% CI, 4.8-43.5), 2.9 (95% CI, 0-8.5), and 28.6 (95% CI, 0.6-56.6) during the intervals 5-9, 10-19, and more than 20 yr after radiotherapy (four cases occurred >20 yr after treatment). There was no evidence of excess risk of second systemic malignancy. An additional 10-yr update confirmed our previous report of an increased risk of second brain tumors in patients with pituitary adenoma treated with surgery and radiotherapy. The 2.4% risk at 20 yr remains low and should not preclude the use of radiotherapy as an effective treatment option. However, an increased risk of second brain tumors continues beyond 20 and 30 yr after treatment.

0 comments Cited 57 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: found

Aggressive Pituitary Tumors

Eleftherios Chatzellis, Krystallenia I Alexandraki, Ioannis Androulakis … (2015)

Pituitary adenomas are common intracranial tumors that are mainly considered as benign. Rarely, these tumors can exhibit an aggressive behavior, characterized by gross invasion of the surrounding tissues, resistance to conventional treatment leading to early and frequent recurrences. Even more rarely, pituitary tumors can give rise to cerebrospinal or systemic metastases qualifying as pituitary carcinomas according to the latest WHO definition. In the same classification, a subset of tumors with relatively distinct histopathological features was identified and defined as atypical adenomas designated to follow a more aggressive clinical course. This classification, although clinically useful, does not provide an accurate correlation between histopathological findings and the clinical behavior of these tumors, neither is it adequate to convey the precise features of ‘aggressive' tumors. Thus, ‘aggressive' pituitary adenomas need to be properly defined with clinical, radiological, histological and molecular markers in order to identify patients at increased risk of early recurrence or subsequent tumor progression. At present, no single marker or classification system of pituitary tumor aggressiveness exists, and clinically useful information in the literature is insufficient to guide diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. Treatment of patients with aggressive pituitary tumors is challenging since conventional treatments often fail, necessitating multiple surgical procedures with additional radiotherapy. Although traditional chemotherapy applied in other neuroendocrine tumors has not been shown to be efficacious, newer agents, particularly temozolomide, have shown promising results and are currently used despite the lack of data from a randomized prospective trial. Molecular targeted therapies such as mTOR and epidermal growth factor inhibitors have also been applied and might prove to be useful in the management of these patients. In the present review, we provide information regarding the epidemiology and clinical, histopathological and molecular features of aggressive pituitary tumors using recent employed definitions. In addition, we review currently employed therapeutic means providing a therapeutic algorithm and highlight the need to identify more specific disease-related and prognostic markers and the necessity for central registration of these tumors.

0 comments Cited 52 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

All references

Author and article information

Journal

Journal ID (nlm-ta): Cureus

Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Cureus

Journal ID (issn): 2168-8184

Title: Cureus

Publisher: Cureus (Palo Alto (CA) )

ISSN (Electronic): 2168-8184

Publication date (Electronic, pub): 2 May 2017

Publication date (Electronic, collection): May 2017

Volume: 9

Issue: 5

Electronic Location Identifier: e1211

Affiliations

[1 ] Neurosurgery, Advocate Health Care

[2 ] Neurosurgery, Central Illinois

Author notes

Evan M. Krueger dr.evankrueger@ 123456gmail.com

Article

DOI: 10.7759/cureus.1211

PMC ID: 5453734

SO-VID: 28d6de73-1897-4890-bfc5-c4ab5b756b30

License:

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Seeding of a Pituitary Adenoma or Atypical Pituitary Carcinoma?

Read this article at

Abstract

Related collections

50 years of ROAPE

Most cited references 10

A new prognostic clinicopathological classification of pituitary adenomas: a multicentric case-control study of 410 patients with 8 years post-operative follow-up.

Risk of second brain tumor after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for pituitary adenoma: update after an additional 10 years.

Aggressive Pituitary Tumors

Author and article information

Journal

Affiliations

Author notes

Article

History

Categories

Comments

Comment on this article

Similar content 488

Cited by 2

Most referenced authors 144