28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Beyond Biology: The Crucial Role of Sex and Gender in Oncology

      Submit here before May 31, 2024

      About Oncology Research and Treatment: 2.4 Impact Factor I 3.3 CiteScore I 0.495 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Feasibility of Preoperative Chemotherapy with Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil versus Adriamycin, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil for Resectable Advanced Esophageal Cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) requires reassessment. We have conducted a trial aiming at the comparison between DCF and ACF concerning perioperative adverse events. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either DCF [docetaxel 70 mg/m<sup>2</sup>, cisplatin 70 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 700 mg/m<sup>2</sup> for 5 days] every 3 weeks or ACF (adriamycin 35 mg/m<sup>2</sup>, cisplatin 70 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1, and 5-FU 700 mg/m<sup>2</sup> for 7 days) every 4 weeks. Each group consisted of 81 patients. Two cycles of preoperative chemotherapy were planned, after which patients underwent subtotal esophagectomy via a right thoracotomy with lymphadenectomy. Chemotherapy- and surgery-related adverse effects were assessed. Results: Grade 3-4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia occurred in 90 and 39% of patients, respectively, in the DCF group compared with 69 and 17% of patients, respectively, in the ACF group ( p < 0.01). Perioperative complications did not differ significantly between the groups. The overall response rates of DCF and ACF were 61 and 40%, respectively, while the histopathological complete responses were 15 and 3%, respectively ( p < 0.01). Conclusion: The DCF and ACF regimens were found to be equally feasible in patients with resectable advanced ESCC; however, DCF delivered an antitumor effect and therefore potentially improved the long-term outcomes.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          OCL
          Oncology
          10.1159/issn.0030-2414
          Oncology
          S. Karger AG
          0030-2414
          1423-0232
          2017
          January 2017
          02 December 2016
          : 92
          : 2
          : 101-108
          Affiliations
          aDepartment of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, bDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, cDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease, dDepartment of Surgery, Osaka General Medical Center, and eDepartment of Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, fSurgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, and gSurgery, Kinki Central Hospital, Itami, Japan
          Author notes
          *Dr. Osamu Shiraishi, Department of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohnohigashi, Osakasayama, Osaka 589-8511 (Japan), E-Mail shiro@surg.med.kindai.ac.jp
          Author information
          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8529-2844
          Article
          452765 Oncology 2017;92:101-108
          10.1159/000452765
          27907921
          29362bef-fd3f-4300-891c-988324d173c3
          © 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          History
          : 01 September 2016
          : 19 October 2016
          Page count
          Tables: 5, References: 30, Pages: 8
          Categories
          Clinical Study

          Oncology & Radiotherapy,Pathology,Surgery,Obstetrics & Gynecology,Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine,Hematology
          Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma,Adverse events,Chemoradiotherapy,Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

          Comments

          Comment on this article