0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Bilateral simultaneous hip arthroplasty shows comparable early outcome and complication rate as staged bilateral hip arthroplasty for patients scored ASA 1-3 if performed by a high-volume surgeon

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          The aim of this study was to compare early outcomes after simultaneous and staged hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with bilateral symptomatic pathology.

          Methods

          We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all patients scheduled for primary THA for bilateral hip osteoarthritis (OA, n = 290). Patients either received simultaneous ( n = 152, 52.4%) or staged ( n = 138, 47.6%) bilateral THA based on individual preference. All operations ( n = 428) were performed by one single, high-volume surgeon. Demographic data (e.g., age, ASA score) as well as perioperative parameters (haemoglobin drop (Hb), red blood cell transfusion, length of stay (LOS), operation time, six week complication rate and achievement of inpatient rehabilitation key points) were evaluated.

          Results

          Patients in the simultaneous bilateral THA group were younger (62.8 ± 8.9 vs. 65 ± 9.7 years, p = 0.022) and had lower ASA scores (1.8, (34.2% ASA 1, 55.3% ASA 2, 37.2% ASA 3) vs. 2.0 (18.8% ASA 1, 61.6% ASA 2, 19.6% ASA 3)) than the staged group. While the average LOS was 7.1 ± 1.7 days for simultaneous bilateral THA, the combined LOS for the staged group was 12.9 ± 2.4 days ( p < 0.001). The cumulative operation time in the simultaneous bilateral THA group was 61.1 ± 11.5 min and 57.6 ± 7.3 min in the staged group ( p < 0.015). Cumulative Hb loss was significantly higher in the staged group (2.1 ± 7.2 g/dl vs. 3.7 ± 1.3 g/dl, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found concerning the complication rate or early inpatient rehabilitation.

          Conclusion

          Simultaneous bilateral hip arthroplasty in patients with symptomatic bilateral hip osteoarthritis is as safe and successful as a staged procedure if performed by a high-volume surgeon.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Higher Hb level is associated with better early functional recovery after hip fracture repair.

          The benefits and indications for blood transfusion are controversial. One possible reason to transfuse is to improve functional recovery after major surgery. However, the data linking improved function with higher Hb concentration are limited. A: retrospective cohort study was performed in 5793 patients at least 60 years old undergoing hip fracture repair at 20 academic and community hospitals. The primary outcome was distance walked at the time of discharge from the hospital. The mean postoperative Hb concentration was the main exposure variable and was defined as the average value from Day 1 after surgery to discharge. We used robust regression to assess the association between postoperative Hb level with distance walked, controlling for other preoperative variables that could influence functional recovery. On bivariate analysis, the predicted distance walked at discharge in feet (95% CI) increased with higher Hb levels (7 g/dL, 56 feet [42-70]; 8 g/dL, 61 feet [54-68]; 9 g/dL, 67 feet [64-70]; 10 g/dL, 74 feet [72-77]; 11 g/dL, 83 feet [80-85]; 12 g/dL, 92 feet [87-96]). After adjustment for other factors associated with ability to walk, higher average postoperative Hb level was independently associated with walking greater distance (p < 0.001). Higher postoperative Hb level may improve functional recovery after hip fracture repair. If confirmed with clinical trials, this finding would provide a rationale to maintain higher Hb concentrations in elderly patients recovering from surgery.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Mortality and implant revision rates of hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis: registry based cohort study

            Objectives To examine mortality and revision rates among patients with osteoarthritis undergoing hip arthroplasty and to compare these rates between patients undergoing cemented or uncemented procedures and to compare outcomes between men undergoing stemmed total hip replacements and Birmingham hip resurfacing. Design Cohort study. Setting National Joint Registry. Population About 275 000 patient records. Main outcome measures Hip arthroplasty procedures were linked to the time to any subsequent mortality or revision (implant failure). Flexible parametric survival analysis methods were used to analyse time to mortality and also time to revision. Comparisons between procedure groups were adjusted for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, and complexity. Results As there were large baseline differences in the characteristics of patients receiving cemented, uncemented, or resurfacing procedures, unadjusted comparisons are inappropriate. Multivariable survival analyses identified a higher mortality rate for patients undergoing cemented compared with uncemented total hip replacement (adjusted hazard ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.16); conversely, there was a lower revision rate with cemented procedures (0.53, 0.50 to 0.57). These translate to small predicted differences in population averaged absolute survival probability at all time points. For example, compared with the uncemented group, at eight years after surgery the predicted probability of death in the cemented group was 0.013 higher (0.007 to 0.019) and the predicted probability of revision was 0.015 lower (0.012 to 0.017). In multivariable analyses restricted to men, there was a higher mortality rate in the cemented group and the uncemented group compared with the Birmingham hip resurfacing group. In terms of revision, the Birmingham hip resurfacings had a similar revision rate to uncemented total hip replacements. Both uncemented total hip replacements and Birmingham hip resurfacings had a higher revision rate than cemented total hip replacements. Conclusions There is a small but significant increased risk of revision with uncemented rather than cemented total hip replacement, and a small but significant increased risk of death with cemented procedures. It is not known whether these are causal relations or caused by residual confounding. Compared with uncemented and cemented total hip replacements, Birmingham hip resurfacing has a significantly lower risk of death in men of all ages. Previously, only adjusted analyses of hip implant revision rates have been used to recommend and justify use of cheaper cemented total hip implants. Our investigations additionally consider mortality rates and suggest a potentially higher mortality rate with cemented total hip replacements, which merits further investigation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Early migration characteristics of a hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem: an RSA study.

              Measurement of early stem subsidence can be used to predict the likelihood of long-term femoral component loosening and clinical failure. Data that examines the early migration pattern of clinically proven stems will provide clinicians with useful baseline data with which to compare new stem designs. This study was performed to evaluate the early migration pattern of a hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit femoral component that has been in use for over ten years. We enrolled 30 patients who underwent THA for osteoarthritis. The median age was 70 years (range, 55-80 years). Patients were clinically assessed using the Harris hip score. Radiostereometric analysis was used to evaluate stem migration at three to four days, six months, one year and two years. We observed a mean subsidence of 0.73 mm at six months, 0.62 mm at one year and 0.58 mm at two years and a mean retroversion of 1.82° at six months, 1.90° at one year and 1.59° at two years. This data suggests that subsidence is confined to the first six months after which there was no further subsidence. The results from this study can be compared with those from novel cementless stem designs to help predict the long-term outcome one may expect from new cementless stem designs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                stephanie.kirschbaum@charite.de
                Journal
                Int Orthop
                Int Orthop
                International Orthopaedics
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0341-2695
                1432-5195
                24 June 2023
                24 June 2023
                October 2023
                : 47
                : 10
                : 2571-2578
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-University Hospital Berlin, ( https://ror.org/001w7jn25) Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
                [2 ]GRID grid.517891.3, OCM Orthopädische Chirurgie München, ; Steinerstraße 6, 81369 Munich, Germany
                [3 ]University of Luxembourg, ( https://ror.org/036x5ad56) 2 Av. de l’Universite, 4365 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
                [4 ]University of Napoli Federico II, ( https://ror.org/05290cv24) Corso Umberto I 40, 80138 Naples, Italy
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8263-4354
                Article
                5871
                10.1007/s00264-023-05871-1
                10522735
                37355529
                2a207665-5c20-469b-b4a8-4a14fbc1f62b
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 19 May 2023
                : 13 June 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (3093)
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Custom metadata
                © SICOT aisbl 2023

                Orthopedics
                bilateral simultaneous hip arthroplasty,one-stage hip arthroplasty,two-stage hip arthroplasty,staged hip arthroplasty,complications

                Comments

                Comment on this article