Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Superiority of sugammadex in preventing postoperative pulmonary complications

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Postoperative pulmonary complications often lead to increased mortality and financial burden. Residual paralysis plays a critical role in postoperative pulmonary complications. This meta-analysis was performed to determine whether sugammadex overmatches neostigmine in reducing postoperative pulmonary complications.

          Methods:

          PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Medline through Ovid, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Chinese BioMedical Literature Databases were searched from their inception to 24 June, 2021. Random effects models were used for all analyses. Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the quality of RCTs, while Newcastle Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to assess for the quality of cohort studies.

          Results:

          Seventeen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled data from cohort studies showed reversing neuromuscular blocking with sugammadex had less risk of compound postoperative pulmonary complications (relative risk [RR]: 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60–0.89; P = 0.002; I 2 = 81%), pneumonia (RR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.48–0.86; I 2 = 42%) and respiratory failure (RR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.41–0.56; I 2 = 0%). However, pooled data from RCTs did not show any difference between the two groups in pneumonia (RR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.24–1.40; I 2 = 0%) and no respiratory failure was reported in the included RCTs. The difference was not found between sugammadex and neostigmine about atelectasis in pooled data from either RCTs (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.69–1.05; I 2 = 0%) or cohort studies (RR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.87–1.18; I 2 = 0%).

          Conclusion:

          The evidence of superiority of sugammadex was limited by the confounding factors in cohort studies and small scale of RCTs. Whether sugammadex precedes neostigmine in preventing pulmonary complications after surgery is still unknown. Well-designed RCTs with large scale are needed.

          Registration:

          PROSPERO ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/); CRD 42020191575

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Chin Med J (Engl)
                Chin Med J (Engl)
                CM9
                Chinese Medical Journal
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                0366-6999
                2542-5641
                5 July 2023
                28 March 2023
                : 136
                : 13
                : 1551-1559
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
                [2 ]Translational Neuroscience Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
                [3 ]Department of Pain, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Prof. Wensheng Zhang, Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China; Translational Neuroscience Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China E-Mail: zhang_ws@ 123456scu.edu.cn
                Article
                CMJ-2021-2527 00005
                10.1097/CM9.0000000000002381
                10325761
                37027443
                2a6762cf-be39-452a-a25b-c9af6166f734
                Copyright © 2023 The Chinese Medical Association, produced by Wolters Kluwer, Inc. under the CC-BY-NC-ND license.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

                History
                : 02 August 2022
                Categories
                Meta Analysis
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                sugammadex,neostigmine,pulmonary complications,pneumonia,paralysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article