0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Romosozumab Enhances Vertebral Bone Structure in Women With Low Bone Density

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Romosozumab monoclonal antibody treatment works by binding sclerostin and causing rapid stimulation of bone formation while decreasing bone resorption. The location and local magnitude of vertebral bone accrual by romosozumab and how it compares to teriparatide remains to be investigated. Here we analyzed the data from a study collecting lumbar computed tomography (CT) spine scans at enrollment and 12 months post‐treatment with romosozumab (210 mg sc monthly, n = 17), open‐label daily teriparatide (20 μg sc, n = 19), or placebo (sc monthly, n = 20). For each of the 56 women, cortical thickness (Ct.Th), endocortical thickness (Ec.Th), cortical bone mineral density (Ct.bone mineral density (BMD)), cancellous BMD (Cn.BMD), and cortical mass surface density (CMSD) were measured across the first lumbar vertebral surface. In addition, color maps of the changes in the lumbar vertebrae structure were statistically analyzed and then visualized on the bone surface. At 12 months, romosozumab improved all parameters significantly over placebo and resulted in a mean vertebral Ct.Th increase of 10.3% versus 4.3% for teriparatide, an Ec.Th increase of 137.6% versus 47.5% for teriparatide, a Ct.BMD increase of 2.1% versus a −0.1% decrease for teriparatide, and a CMSD increase of 12.4% versus 3.8% for teriparatide. For all these measurements, the differences between romosozumab and teriparatide were statistically significant ( p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the romosozumab‐associated Cn.BMD gains of 22.2% versus 18.1% for teriparatide, but both were significantly greater compared with the change in the placebo group (−4.6%, p < 0.05). Cortical maps showed the topographical locations of the increase in bone in fracture‐prone areas of the vertebral shell, walls, and endplates. This study confirms widespread vertebral bone accrual with romosozumab or teriparatide treatment and provides new insights into how the rapid prevention of vertebral fractures is achieved in women with osteoporosis using these anabolic agents. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Romosozumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density.

            Sclerostin is an osteocyte-derived inhibitor of osteoblast activity. The monoclonal antibody romosozumab binds to sclerostin and increases bone formation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis.

              Background Romosozumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds sclerostin, increases bone formation and decreases bone resorption. Methods We enrolled 7180 postmenopausal women who had a T score of -2.5 to -3.5 at the total hip or femoral neck. Patients were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous injections of romosozumab (at a dose of 210 mg) or placebo monthly for 12 months; thereafter, patients in each group received denosumab for 12 months, at a dose of 60 mg, administered subcutaneously every 6 months. The coprimary end points were the cumulative incidences of new vertebral fractures at 12 months and 24 months. Secondary end points included clinical (a composite of nonvertebral and symptomatic vertebral) and nonvertebral fractures. Results At 12 months, new vertebral fractures had occurred in 16 of 3321 patients (0.5%) in the romosozumab group, as compared with 59 of 3322 (1.8%) in the placebo group (representing a 73% lower risk with romosozumab; P<0.001). Clinical fractures had occurred in 58 of 3589 patients (1.6%) in the romosozumab group, as compared with 90 of 3591 (2.5%) in the placebo group (a 36% lower risk with romosozumab; P=0.008). Nonvertebral fractures had occurred in 56 of 3589 patients (1.6%) in the romosozumab group and in 75 of 3591 (2.1%) in the placebo group (P=0.10). At 24 months, the rates of vertebral fractures were significantly lower in the romosozumab group than in the placebo group after each group made the transition to denosumab (0.6% [21 of 3325 patients] in the romosozumab group vs. 2.5% [84 of 3327] in the placebo group, a 75% lower risk with romosozumab; P<0.001). Adverse events, including instances of hyperostosis, cardiovascular events, osteoarthritis, and cancer, appeared to be balanced between the groups. One atypical femoral fracture and two cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw were observed in the romosozumab group. Conclusions In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, romosozumab was associated with a lower risk of vertebral fracture than placebo at 12 months and, after the transition to denosumab, at 24 months. The lower risk of clinical fracture that was seen with romosozumab was evident at 1 year. (Funded by Amgen and UCB Pharma; FRAME ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01575834 .).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                kp254@medschl.cam.ac.uk
                Journal
                J Bone Miner Res
                J Bone Miner Res
                10.1002/(ISSN)1523-4681
                JBMR
                Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                0884-0431
                1523-4681
                16 December 2021
                February 2022
                : 37
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1002/jbmr.v37.2 )
                : 256-264
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Medicine University of Cambridge and Addenbrooke's Hospital Cambridge UK
                [ 2 ] Department of Engineering University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
                [ 3 ] Bethesda Health Research Center Bethesda MD USA
                [ 4 ] CHU de Québec Research Centre and Laval University Quebec City Canada
                [ 5 ] Ghent University Hospital Ghent Belgium
                [ 6 ] Amgen Inc. Thousand Oaks CA USA
                [ 7 ] University of Calgary Calgary Canada
                [ 8 ] Centro de Osteopatias Medicas Buenos Aires Argentina
                [ 9 ] United Osteoporosis Centers Gainesville GA USA
                [ 10 ] UCB Pharma Brussels Belgium
                [ 11 ] Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Address correspondence to: Kenneth ES Poole, PhD, Bone Research Group, Department of Medicine, Box 157, Level 5, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK. E‐mail: kp254@ 123456medschl.cam.ac.uk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4546-7352
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7102-5518
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1427-7839
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8272-9505
                Article
                JBMR4465
                10.1002/jbmr.4465
                9299688
                34738660
                2a70d8d4-53a5-40e8-a238-ec7806dfe0f7
                © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 11 October 2021
                : 08 May 2021
                : 20 October 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 2, Pages: 9, Words: 6482
                Funding
                Funded by: Amgen , doi 10.13039/100002429;
                Award ID: RG72842
                Funded by: NIHR Cambridge BRC , doi 10.13039/501100018956;
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                February 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.7 mode:remove_FC converted:20.07.2022

                Human biology
                bone qct/microct,analysis/quantitation of bone,osteoporosis,diseases and disorders of/related to bone,anabolics,therapeutics,antiresorptives

                Comments

                Comment on this article