3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Multiclass CBCT Image Segmentation for Orthodontics with Deep Learning

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Accurate segmentation of the jaw (i.e., mandible and maxilla) and the teeth in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans is essential for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Although various (semi)automated methods have been proposed to segment the jaw or the teeth, there is still a lack of fully automated segmentation methods that can simultaneously segment both anatomic structures in CBCT scans (i.e., multiclass segmentation). In this study, we aimed to train and validate a mixed-scale dense (MS-D) convolutional neural network for multiclass segmentation of the jaw, the teeth, and the background in CBCT scans. Thirty CBCT scans were obtained from patients who had undergone orthodontic treatment. Gold standard segmentation labels were manually created by 4 dentists. As a benchmark, we also evaluated MS-D networks that segmented the jaw or the teeth (i.e., binary segmentation). All segmented CBCT scans were converted to virtual 3-dimensional (3D) models. The segmentation performance of all trained MS-D networks was assessed by the Dice similarity coefficient and surface deviation. The CBCT scans segmented by the MS-D network demonstrated a large overlap with the gold standard segmentations (Dice similarity coefficient: 0.934 ± 0.019, jaw; 0.945 ± 0.021, teeth). The MS-D network–based 3D models of the jaw and the teeth showed minor surface deviations when compared with the corresponding gold standard 3D models (0.390 ± 0.093 mm, jaw; 0.204 ± 0.061 mm, teeth). The MS-D network took approximately 25 s to segment 1 CBCT scan, whereas manual segmentation took about 5 h. This study showed that multiclass segmentation of jaw and teeth was accurate and its performance was comparable to binary segmentation. The MS-D network trained for multiclass segmentation would therefore make patient-specific orthodontic treatment more feasible by strongly reducing the time required to segment multiple anatomic structures in CBCT scans.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis

          Deep learning algorithms, in particular convolutional networks, have rapidly become a methodology of choice for analyzing medical images. This paper reviews the major deep learning concepts pertinent to medical image analysis and summarizes over 300 contributions to the field, most of which appeared in the last year. We survey the use of deep learning for image classification, object detection, segmentation, registration, and other tasks. Concise overviews are provided of studies per application area: neuro, retinal, pulmonary, digital pathology, breast, cardiac, abdominal, musculoskeletal. We end with a summary of the current state-of-the-art, a critical discussion of open challenges and directions for future research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index.

            To examine a statistical validation method based on the spatial overlap between two sets of segmentations of the same anatomy. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used as a statistical validation metric to evaluate the performance of both the reproducibility of manual segmentations and the spatial overlap accuracy of automated probabilistic fractional segmentation of MR images, illustrated on two clinical examples. Example 1: 10 consecutive cases of prostate brachytherapy patients underwent both preoperative 1.5T and intraoperative 0.5T MR imaging. For each case, 5 repeated manual segmentations of the prostate peripheral zone were performed separately on preoperative and on intraoperative images. Example 2: A semi-automated probabilistic fractional segmentation algorithm was applied to MR imaging of 9 cases with 3 types of brain tumors. DSC values were computed and logit-transformed values were compared in the mean with the analysis of variance (ANOVA). Example 1: The mean DSCs of 0.883 (range, 0.876-0.893) with 1.5T preoperative MRI and 0.838 (range, 0.819-0.852) with 0.5T intraoperative MRI (P < .001) were within and at the margin of the range of good reproducibility, respectively. Example 2: Wide ranges of DSC were observed in brain tumor segmentations: Meningiomas (0.519-0.893), astrocytomas (0.487-0.972), and other mixed gliomas (0.490-0.899). The DSC value is a simple and useful summary measure of spatial overlap, which can be applied to studies of reproducibility and accuracy in image segmentation. We observed generally satisfactory but variable validation results in two clinical applications. This metric may be adapted for similar validation tasks.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Artefacts in CBCT: a review.

              Artefacts are common in today's cone beam CT (CBCT). They are induced by discrepancies between the mathematical modelling and the actual physical imaging process. Since artefacts may interfere with the diagnostic process performed on CBCT data sets, every user should be aware of their presence. This article aims to discuss the most prominent artefacts identified in the scientific literature and review the existing knowledge on these artefacts. We also briefly review the basic three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction concept applied by today's CBCT scanners, as all artefacts are more or less directly related to it.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Dent Res
                J Dent Res
                JDR
                spjdr
                Journal of Dental Research
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                0022-0345
                1544-0591
                30 March 2021
                August 2021
                : 100
                : 9
                : 943-949
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Pathology, 3D Innovation Lab, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
                [2 ]Centrum Wiskunde and Informatica, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
                [3 ]Institute of Information Technology, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou, China
                [4 ]Department of Oral Implantology and Prosthetic Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
                Author notes
                [*]H. Wang, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Oral Pathology, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, the Netherlands. Email: h.wang@ 123456amsterdamumc.nl
                [*]F.J. Hu, Institute of Information Technology, Zhejiang Shuren University, Shuren Street No. 8, Hangzhou, 310015, China. Email: hufengjun@ 123456zjsru.edu.cn
                [*]G. Wu, Department of Oral Implantology and Prosthetic Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Gustav Mahlerlaan 3004, Amsterdam, 1081 LA, the Netherlands. Email: g.wu@ 123456acta.nl
                Article
                10.1177_00220345211005338
                10.1177/00220345211005338
                8293763
                33783247
                2c9db489-722f-4dbb-8f40-d7db26d44e31
                © International & American Associations for Dental Research 2021

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100003246;
                Award ID: 040.20.009/040.20.010
                Categories
                Research Reports
                Biomaterials & Bioengineering
                Custom metadata
                ts1

                facial bones,dentofacial deformities,diagnostic imaging,image processing,neural networks,artificial intelligence

                Comments

                Comment on this article