35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prognostic impact of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations in primary colorectal carcinomas: a population-based study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Activation of oncogenes downstream the EGFR gene contributes to colorectal tumorigenesis and determines the sensitivity to anti-EGFR treatments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS and PIK3CA mutations in a large collection of CRC patients from genetically-homogeneous Sardinian population.

          Methods

          A total of 1284 Sardinian patients with histologically-proven diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and presenting with metastatic disease were included into the study. Genomic DNA was isolated from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded primary tumour tissue samples of CRC patients and screened for mutations in RAS and BRAF genes, using pyrosequencing assays, and in PIK3CA gene, using automated DNA sequencing assays.

          Results

          Overall, mutation rates were 35.6 % for KRAS, 4.1 % for NRAS, and 2.1 % for BRAF. Among available DNA samples, 114/796 (14.3 %) primary CRCs were found to carry a mutation in the PIK3CA gene. In this subset of patients analysed in all four genes, a pathogenetic mutation of at least one gene was discovered in about half (378/796; 47.5 %) of CRC cases. A mutated BRAF gene was found to steadily act as a negative prognostic factor for either time to progression as metastatic disease (from detection of primary CRC to diagnosis of first distant metastasis; p = 0.009) or partial survival (from diagnosis of advanced disease to the time of death or last control; p = 0.006) or overall survival (p < 0.001). No significant impact on prognosis was observed for mutated KRAS, NRAS, and PIK3CA genes or combined RAS mutations (all RAS).

          Conclusions

          Our study defines both prevalence and prognostic role of main activated oncogenes in a population-based large collection of CRC patients.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12967-016-1053-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Microsatellite Instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer.

            In December 1997, the National Cancer Institute sponsored "The International Workshop on Microsatellite Instability and RER Phenotypes in Cancer Detection and Familial Predisposition," to review and unify the field. The following recommendations were endorsed at the workshop. (a) The form of genomic instability associated with defective DNA mismatch repair in tumors is to be called microsatellite instability (MSI). (b) A panel of five microsatellites has been validated and is recommended as a reference panel for future research in the field. Tumors may be characterized on the basis of: high-frequency MSI (MSI-H), if two or more of the five markers show instability (i.e., have insertion/deletion mutations), and low-frequency MSI (MSI-L), if only one of the five markers shows instability. The distinction between microsatellite stable (MSS) and low frequency MSI (MSI-L) can only be accomplished if a greater number of markers is utilized. (c) A unique clinical and pathological phenotype is identified for the MSI-H tumors, which comprise approximately 15% of colorectal cancers, whereas MSI-L and MSS tumors appear to be phenotypically similar. MSI-H colorectal tumors are found predominantly in the proximal colon, have unique histopathological features, and are associated with a less aggressive clinical course than are stage-matched MSI-L or MSS tumors. Preclinical models suggest the possibility that these tumors may be resistant to the cytotoxicity induced by certain chemotherapeutic agents. The implications for MSI-L are not yet clear. (d) MSI can be measured in fresh or fixed tumor specimens equally well; microdissection of pathological specimens is recommended to enrich for neoplastic tissue; and normal tissue is required to document the presence of MSI. (e) The "Bethesda guidelines," which were developed in 1996 to assist in the selection of tumors for microsatellite analysis, are endorsed. (f) The spectrum of microsatellite alterations in noncolonic tumors was reviewed, and it was concluded that the above recommendations apply only to colorectal neoplasms. (g) A research agenda was recommended.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              CpG island methylator phenotype underlies sporadic microsatellite instability and is tightly associated with BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer.

              Aberrant DNA methylation of CpG islands has been widely observed in human colorectal tumors and is associated with gene silencing when it occurs in promoter areas. A subset of colorectal tumors has an exceptionally high frequency of methylation of some CpG islands, leading to the suggestion of a distinct trait referred to as 'CpG island methylator phenotype', or 'CIMP'. However, the existence of CIMP has been challenged. To resolve this continuing controversy, we conducted a systematic, stepwise screen of 195 CpG island methylation markers using MethyLight technology, involving 295 primary human colorectal tumors and 16,785 separate quantitative analyses. We found that CIMP-positive (CIMP+) tumors convincingly represent a distinct subset, encompassing almost all cases of tumors with BRAF mutation (odds ratio = 203). Sporadic cases of mismatch repair deficiency occur almost exclusively as a consequence of CIMP-associated methylation of MLH1 . We propose a robust new marker panel to classify CIMP+ tumors.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                graziap68@yahoo.it
                valentinadoneddu@gmail.com
                cossu@uniss.it
                +393405931590 , panospaliogiannis@gmail.com
                antonella.manca@icb.cnr.it
                casulam@yahoo.it
                colombinom@yahoo.it
                am.lanzillo@tiscali.it
                defraiae@gmail.com
                antonio.pazzola@tiscali.it
                gisanna@uniss.it
                cputzu@gmail.com
                ortu.salv@tiscali.it
                marioscartozzi@gmail.com
                mtionta@yahoo.it
                giovannibaldino@tiscali.it
                gi.sarobba@tiscali.it
                francapelli@tiscali.it
                tito.sedda@alice.it
                virdis@tiscali.it
                kikkyboat@yahoo.it
                g.gramignano@libero.it
                marbudroni@gmail.com
                tandaf@uniss.it
                gpalmieri@yahoo.com
                Journal
                J Transl Med
                J Transl Med
                Journal of Translational Medicine
                BioMed Central (London )
                1479-5876
                13 October 2016
                13 October 2016
                2016
                : 14
                : 292
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry, CNR, Sassari, Italy
                [2 ]Department of Surgical, Microsurgical and Medical Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale San Pietro 43, 07100 Sassari, PC Italy
                [3 ]Oncology Unit, Businco Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
                [4 ]Medical Oncology Unit, University—Hospital of Sassari (AOU), Sassari, Italy
                [5 ]Oncology Unit, Local Health Agency, Olbia, Italy
                [6 ]Department of Medical Oncology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
                [7 ]Oncology Unit, Civil Hospital, Alghero, Italy
                [8 ]Oncology Unit, Zonchello Hospital, Nuoro, Italy
                [9 ]Oncology Unit, Local Health Agency, Oristano, Italy
                [10 ]Oncology Unit, Local Health Agency, Carbonia-Iglesias, Italy
                [11 ]Oncology Unit, Local Health Agency, Lanusei, Italy
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5485-6056
                Article
                1053
                10.1186/s12967-016-1053-z
                5064898
                27737711
                2cbee240-2338-42c6-864b-9c7a62259779
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 6 August 2016
                : 5 October 2016
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Medicine
                colorectal cancer,kras,nras,braf,pic3ca
                Medicine
                colorectal cancer, kras, nras, braf, pic3ca

                Comments

                Comment on this article