57
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Role of Anorexia in Resistance and Tolerance to Infections in Drosophila

      research-article
      , *
      PLoS Biology
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Infections initiate a signaling loop in which sick animals become anorexic, and the resulting change in diet alters the body's ability to fight infections in good and bad ways.

          Abstract

          Most infections induce anorexia but its function, if any, remains unclear. Because this response is common among animals, we hypothesized that infection-induced diet restriction might be an adaptive trait that modulates the host's ability to fight infection. Two defense strategies protect hosts against infections: resistance, which is the ability to control pathogen levels, and tolerance, which helps the host endure infection-induced pathology. Here we show that infected fruit flies become anorexic and that diet restriction alters defenses, increasing the fly's tolerance to Salmonella typhimurium infections while decreasing resistance to Listeria monocytogenes. This suggests that attempts to extend lifespan through diet restriction or the manipulation of pathways mimicking this process will have complicated effects on a host's ability to fight infections.

          Author Summary

          Two routes to decreasing susceptibility to infection are resistance (the ability to clear pathogens) and tolerance (the ability to limit damage in response to pathogens). Anorexia induced by sickness puts animals into a diet-restricted state, a state that is generally believed to extend lifespan. We asked whether anorexia induced by sickness would alter the immune response. We measured the effects of diet restriction on both resistance and tolerance to two different infections in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. In one case we found that infection induced anorexia and the resulting diet restriction increased tolerance to this infection, thereby increasing survival of flies infected with this pathogen; however, this is not a universal effect. In a second case we found another pathogen that induced anorexia but here diet restriction lead to a reduction in resistance that collapsed the immune response and caused the fly to die faster. The relationship between diet restriction and immunity is complicated and must be evaluated on a pathogen-by-pathogen basis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The dorsoventral regulatory gene cassette spätzle/Toll/cactus controls the potent antifungal response in Drosophila adults.

          The cytokine-induced activation cascade of NF-kappaB in mammals and the activation of the morphogen dorsal in Drosophila embryos show striking structural and functional similarities (Toll/IL-1, Cactus/I-kappaB, and dorsal/NF-kappaB). Here we demonstrate that these parallels extend to the immune response of Drosophila. In particular, the intracellular components of the dorsoventral signaling pathway (except for dorsal) and the extracellular Toll ligand, spätzle, control expression of the antifungal peptide gene drosomycin in adults. We also show that mutations in the Toll signaling pathway dramatically reduce survival after fungal infection. Antibacterial genes are induced either by a distinct pathway involving the immune deficiency gene (imd) or by combined activation of both imd and dorsoventral pathways.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dual detection of fungal infections in Drosophila via recognition of glucans and sensing of virulence factors.

            The Drosophila immune system discriminates between various types of infections and activates appropriate signal transduction pathways to combat the invading microorganisms. The Toll pathway is required for the host response against fungal and most Gram-positive bacterial infections. The sensing of Gram-positive bacteria is mediated by the pattern recognition receptors PGRP-SA and GNBP1 that cooperate to detect the presence of infections in the host. Here, we report that GNBP3 is a pattern recognition receptor that is required for the detection of fungal cell wall components. Strikingly, we find that there is a second, parallel pathway acting jointly with GNBP3. The Drosophila Persephone protease activates the Toll pathway when proteolytically matured by the secreted fungal virulence factor PR1. Thus, the detection of fungal infections in Drosophila relies both on the recognition of invariant microbial patterns and on monitoring the effects of virulence factors on the host.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Relish, a central factor in the control of humoral but not cellular immunity in Drosophila.

              The NF-kappa B-like Relish gene is complex, with four transcripts that are all located within an intron of the Nmdmc gene. Using deletion mutants, we show that Relish is specifically required for the induction of the humoral immune response, including both antibacterial and antifungal peptides. As a result, the Relish mutants are very sensitive to infection. A single cell of E. cloacae is sufficient to kill a mutant fly, and the mutants show increased susceptibility to fungal infection. In contrast, the blood cell population, the hematopoietic organs, and the phagocytic, encapsulation, and melanization responses are normal. Our results illustrate the importance of the humoral response in Drosophila immunity and demonstrate that Relish plays a key role in this response.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Biol
                plos
                plosbiol
                PLoS Biology
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1544-9173
                1545-7885
                July 2009
                July 2009
                14 July 2009
                : 7
                : 7
                : e1000150
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America
                University of Georgia, United States of America
                Author notes

                The author(s) have made the following declarations about their contributions: Conceived and designed the experiments: JSA DSS. Performed the experiments: JSA. Analyzed the data: JSA DSS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JSA DSS. Wrote the paper: JSA DSS.

                [¤]

                Current address: Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America

                Article
                09-PLBI-RA-0825R2
                10.1371/journal.pbio.1000150
                2701602
                19597539
                2ce9a2f4-d79e-46af-85cb-0083fd31ff78
                Ayres, Schneider. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
                History
                : 26 February 2009
                : 4 June 2009
                Page count
                Pages: 10
                Categories
                Research Article
                Immunology/Cellular Microbiology and Pathogenesis
                Microbiology/Innate Immunity
                Nutrition

                Life sciences
                Life sciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article