18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Lower vitamin D levels in Saudi pregnant women are associated with higher risk of developing GDM

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has serious consequences such as increased risks of preeclampsia, macrosomia and cesarean delivery. Even though the mechanistic basis of GDM has not been completely understood, several risk factors have been identified and one of these is vitamin D. However, the link between vitamin D deficiency and development of GDM is yet to be proven with certainty.

          Methods

          This study aimed to investigate the link between the incidence of GDM and serum vitamin D level in pregnant women of Saudi Arabia. 515 Saudi women (ages 18–46) in their 24-28th week of pregnancy, visiting various hospitals of Riyadh, participated in this study. Serum vitamin D and various biochemical and anthropometric parameters were determined in the first trimester and the recruits were screened for GDM by OGTT according to IADPSG criteria in their 2nd trimester. The association between vitamin D deficiency and development of GDM was calculated based on odds ratio of the incidence of GDM among vitamin D deficient and normal women.

          Results

          In this study cohort of 515 pregnant women, in the first trimester vitamin D deficiency (< 50 nmol/l) was detected in 425 (82.5%). On their 2nd visit (2nd trimester), 116 (27.7%) were diagnosed with GDM out of 419 with OGTT, according to IADPSG criteria. GDM risk was significantly higher among vitamin D deficient than non-deficient women (Odds Ratio: 2.87; Confidence Interval: 1.32–6.25; P = 0.008) even after adjusting for season, sun exposure and vitamin D intake (OR: 2.9; CI: 1.07–7.89). Of the various anthropometric and biochemical parameters, the GDM women differed significantly from non-GDM women with respect to serum levels of triglycerides (in mmol/l) (1.3 ± 0.6; 1.5 ± 0.6, p = 0.018) and fasting glucose (in mmol/l) [4.7 (4.3–5.2); 5.1 (4.6–5.6), p < 0.01]. Also, fasting glucose level in the 2nd trimester correlated inversely to serum vitamin D level determined during the 1st trimester ( r = − 0.121; p = 0.014).

          Conclusions

          Results of our study reveal a significantly higher risk of development of GDM among pregnant women having deficient vitamin D status.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Maternal vitamin D status and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

          To estimate the associations between maternal vitamin D status and adverse pregnancy outcomes. We searched electronic databases of the human literature in PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library up to October, 2012 using the following keywords: "vitamin D" and "status" or "deficiency" or "insufficiency" and "pregnancy". A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on observational studies that reported the association between maternal blood vitamin D levels and adverse pregnancy outcomes including preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), preterm birth or small-for-gestational age (SGA). Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. Women with circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] level less than 50 nmol/l in pregnancy experienced an increased risk of preeclampsia [odds ratio (OR) 2.09 (95% confidence intervals 1.50-2.90)], GDM [OR 1.38 (1.12-1.70)], preterm birth [OR 1.58 (1.08-2.31)] and SGA [OR 1.52 (1.08-2.15)]. Low maternal vitamin D levels in pregnancy may be associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia, GDM, preterm birth and SGA.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Vitamin D, cognition, and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

            To examine the association between cognitive function and dementia with vitamin D concentration in adults. Five databases were searched for English-language studies up to August 2010, and included all study designs with a comparative group. Cognitive function or impairment was defined by tests of global or domain-specific cognitive performance and dementia was diagnosed according to recognized criteria. A vitamin D measurement was required. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality using predefined criteria. The Q statistic and I² methods were used to test for heterogeneity. We conducted meta-analyses using random effects models for the weighted mean difference (WMD) and Hedge's g. Thirty-seven studies were included; 8 contained data allowing mean Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores to be compared between participants with vitamin D <50 nmol/L to those with values ≥50 nmol/L. There was significant heterogeneity among the studies that compared the WMD for MMSE but an overall positive effect for the higher vitamin D group (1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5 to 1.9; I² = 0.65; p = 0.002). The small positive effect persisted despite several sensitivity analyses. Six studies presented data comparing Alzheimer disease (AD) to controls but 2 utilized a method withdrawn from commercial use. For the remaining 4 studies the AD group had a lower vitamin D concentration compared to the control group (WMD = -6.2 nmol/L, 95% CI -10.6 to -1.8) with no heterogeneity (I² < 0.01; p = 0.53). These results suggest that lower vitamin D concentrations are associated with poorer cognitive function and a higher risk of AD. Further studies are required to determine the significance and potential public health benefit of this association.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical review: The role of the parent compound vitamin D with respect to metabolism and function: Why clinical dose intervals can affect clinical outcomes.

              There is no doubt that vitamin D must be activated to the hormonal form 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D to achieve full biological activity or that many tissues participate in this activation process-be it endocrine or autocrine. We believe that not only is 25-hydroxyvitamin D important to tissue delivery for this activation process, but also that intact vitamin D has a pivotal role in this process. In this review, evidence on the vitamin D endocrine/autocrine system is presented and discussed in relation to vitamin D-binding protein affinity, circulating half-lives, and enzymatic transformations of vitamin D metabolites, and how these affect biological action in any given tissue. Circulating vitamin D, the parent compound, likely plays an important physiological role with respect to the vitamin D endocrine/autocrine system, as a substrate in many tissues, not originally thought to be important. Based on emerging data from the laboratory, clinical trials, and data on circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D amassed during many decades, it is likely that for the optimal functioning of these systems, significant vitamin D should be available on a daily basis to ensure stable circulating concentrations, implying that variation in vitamin D dosing schedules could have profound effects on the outcomes of clinical trials because of the short circulating half-life of intact vitamin D.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                aalajl@hotmail.com
                sara.almosharruf@gmail.com
                monafoudaneel@yahoo.com
                ksounder@gmail.com
                Wani.kaiser@gmail.com
                najij@hotmail.com
                aalserehi@kfmc.med.sa
                eman_shesha@hotmail.com
                alshingetti@yahoo.com
                iqbalzmt@hotmail.com
                afalharbi@ksu.edu.sa
                Buthinah.ali@gmail.com
                amali@kfmc.med.sa
                aldaghri2011@gmail.com
                0096614675939 , aldaghri2011@gmail.com
                Journal
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2393
                10 April 2018
                10 April 2018
                2018
                : 18
                : 86
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1773 5396, GRID grid.56302.32, Department of Clinical Lab Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, , King Saud University, ; Riyadh, 11451 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8809 1613, GRID grid.7372.1, Division of Metabolic and Vascular Health, , University of Warwick, ; CV47AL, Coventry, UK
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1773 5396, GRID grid.56302.32, Prince Mutaib Chair for Biomarkers of Osteoporosis, Department of Biochemistry, College of Science, , King Saud University, ; PO Box, 2455, Riyadh, 11451 Saudi Arabia
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0608 0662, GRID grid.412149.b, Obesity, Endocrine and Metabolism Center, King Fahad Medical City, Faculty of Medicine, , King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, ; Riyadh, 11525 Saudi Arabia
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0593 1832, GRID grid.415277.2, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Department, , King Fahad Medical City, ; Riyadh, 59406 Saudi Arabia
                [6 ]Diabetes Care Center, King Salman Bin Abdulaziz Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [7 ]Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, King Salman Bin Abdulaziz Hospital, Riyadh, 11564 Saudi Arabia
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1773 5396, GRID grid.56302.32, Department of Medicine, Endocrinology Division, College of Medicine, , King Saud University, ; Riyadh, 11461 Saudi Arabia
                [9 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1773 5396, GRID grid.56302.32, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, , King Saud University, ; Riyadh, 11461 Saudi Arabia
                Article
                1723
                10.1186/s12884-018-1723-3
                5891955
                29631547
                2cf651d7-ab9e-40a4-8ad9-641c15ac2fcd
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 17 July 2016
                : 29 March 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: National Plan for Science, Technology and Innovation (MAARIFAH)
                Award ID: 12-MED2504-02
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                25(oh) d,gestational diabetes mellitus,oral glucose tolerance test,type 2 diabetes mellitus,insulin resistance

                Comments

                Comment on this article