5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Flexor pronator muscles' contribution to elbow joint valgus stability: ultrasonographic analysis in high school pitchers with and without symptoms

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Few researchers have examined the different contributions of flexor-pronator muscles to valgus stress in high school baseball pitchers with and without elbow symptoms. This study used ultrasonography to assess these muscles' dynamic contributions to elbow valgus joint stability in high school pitchers.

          Methods

          A self-administered questionnaire on throwing-related elbow joint pain sustained during the prior year was completed by 89 high school baseball pitchers. Gravity stress ultrasonographic elbow examinations with 30° of flexion were done before and after isometric contraction of the flexor-pronator muscles. For study participants with and without a history of elbow symptoms, we compared differences of ulnohumeral joint space without gravity stress and isometric contraction of the flexor-pronator muscles and with gravity stress only and with isometric contraction of the flexor-pronator muscles under gravity stress.

          Results

          For each pitcher, the ulnohumeral joint space in the condition with valgus stress was significantly larger than in the condition without valgus stress. Also, the ulnohumeral joint space in the condition with valgus stress was significantly larger than in the condition with valgus stress and flexor-pronator isometric muscle contraction. Participants with and without elbow symptom history showed no differences of ulnohumeral joint space in the unloaded and loaded flexor-pronator muscle contracted conditions.

          Conclusion

          Ultrasonographic assessment demonstrated that flexor-pronator muscles contribute to elbow valgus stability. No difference was found in the flexor-pronator muscle contribution in high school baseball pitchers with and without elbow symptom history.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          An electromyographic analysis of the upper extremity in pitching.

          The upper extremity is vulnerable to injury during the baseball pitch because of the repetitious nature of the action, the extremes in range of motion, and the high angular velocities and torques generated at the shoulder and elbow. Hence this study was designed to describe the muscle-firing patterns through fine-wire electromyography in 29 muscle bellies in the upper extremities of skilled pitchers during the fastball pitch. The results demonstrated that the muscles functioned with precise timing for joint stabilization to prevent injury, joint activation to transfer forces to the ball, and joint deceleration to dissipate forces after ball release. The synchrony of reciprocal and sequential muscle contraction necessary to accomplish these functions was clearly evident. This study provides a better understanding of the coordinated sequence of muscle activity during the throwing motion; this understanding is crucial to the development of exercise protocols and surgical procedures used for treatment and prevention of shoulder and elbow injuries in the throwing athlete. Copyright © 1992 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Valgus stability of the elbow. A definition of primary and secondary constraints.

            The stabilizing structures of the elbow that resist valgus stress were studied with a tracking device in a model simulating active motion and muscle activity. By varying the order of serial release of the medial collateral ligament complex and removal of the radial head, each structure's contribution to valgus stability against the effect of gravity was determined. In the otherwise intact elbow, absence of the radial head does not significantly alter the three-dimensional characteristics of motion in the elbow joint. Isolated medial collateral release, on the other hand, causes increases in abduction rotation of about 6 degrees-8 degrees in magnitude. Releasing both structures results in gross abduction laxity and elbow subluxation. This study defines the medial collateral ligament (MCL) as the primary constraint of the elbow joint to valgus stress and the radial head as a secondary constraint. This definition facilitates the proper management of patients with radial head fractures and MCL disruption. The comminuted radial head fracture uncomplicated by MCL insufficiency should be treated by excision without the need for an implant and without concern of altering the normal kinematics of the elbow.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Biomechanical evaluation of the medial collateral ligament of the elbow.

              Anatomical dissection and biomechanical testing were used to study twenty-eight cadaveric elbows in order to determine the role of the medial collateral ligament under valgus loading. The medial collateral ligament was composed of anterior, posterior, and occasionally transverse bundles. The anterior bundle was, in turn, composed of anterior and posterior bands that tightened in reciprocal fashion as the elbow was flexed and extended. Sequential cutting of the ligament was performed while rotation caused by valgus torque was measured. The anterior band of the anterior bundle was the primary restraint to valgus rotation at 30, 60, and 90 degrees of flexion and was a co-primary restraint at 120 degrees of flexion. The posterior band of the anterior bundle was a co-primary restraint at 120 degrees of flexion and a secondary restraint at 30 and 90 degrees of flexion. The posterior bundle was a secondary restraint at 30 degrees only. The reciprocal anterior and posterior bands have distinct biomechanical roles and theoretically may be injured separately. The anterior band was more vulnerable to valgus overload when the elbow was extended, whereas the posterior band was more vulnerable when the elbow was flexed. The posterior bundle was not vulnerable to valgus overload unless the anterior bundle was completely disrupted. The intact elbows rotated a mean of 3.6 degrees between the neutral position and the two-newton-meter valgus torque position. Cutting of the entire anterior bundle caused an additional 3.2 degrees of rotation at 90 degrees of flexion, where the effect was greatest. Physical findings in a patient who has an injury of the anterior bundle may be subtle, and an examination should be performed with the elbow in 90 degrees of flexion for greatest sensitivity. As the anterior bundle is the major restraint to valgus rotation, reconstructive procedures should focus on anatomical reproduction of that structure. Parallel limbs of tendon graft placed from the inferior aspect of the medial epicondyle to the area of the sublimis tubercle will simulate the reciprocal bands of the anterior bundle. Temporary immobilization with the elbow in flexion may relax the critically important anterior band of the reconstruction during healing.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JSES Int
                JSES Int
                JSES International
                Elsevier
                2666-6383
                2666-6383
                27 November 2019
                March 2020
                27 November 2019
                : 4
                : 1
                : 9-14
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
                [b ]Gunma Sports Orthopaedics, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
                [c ]Department of Physical Therapy, Takasaki University of Health and Welfare, Takasaki-shi, Gunma, Japan
                [d ]Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Gunma University, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
                [e ]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sada Hospital, Fukuoka Chuo-ku, Fukuoka, Japan
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author: Tsuyoshi Tajika, MD, PhD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan. tajika@ 123456gunma-u.ac.jp
                Article
                S2468-6026(19)30054-3
                10.1016/j.jses.2019.10.003
                7075757
                32544928
                2cf83142-8b9f-43f6-8cc9-7833d9db0482
                © 2019 The Author(s)

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Article

                baseball,elbow,forearm flexor muscle strength,pitcher,ulnar collateral ligament (ucl),valgus instability

                Comments

                Comment on this article