0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Trends in Levels of Lipids and Apolipoprotein B in US Youths Aged 6 to 19 Years, 1999-2016

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi190042-1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d793254e358">Question</h5> <p id="d793254e360">What are the recent trends in serum levels of lipids and apolipoprotein B in US youths aged 6 to 19 years? </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi190042-2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d793254e363">Findings</h5> <p id="d793254e365">In this serial cross-sectional analysis of nationally representative data from 26 047 youths during the period 1999-2000 to 2015-2016, decreasing linear trends were observed in mean levels of total cholesterol (from 164 mg/dL to 155 mg/dL), non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (from 108 mg/dL to 100 mg/dL), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (from 92 mg/dL to 86 mg/dL), triglycerides (from 78 mg/dL to 63 mg/dL), and apolipoprotein B (from 70 mg/dL to 67 mg/dL), and increasing linear trends were observed in mean levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (from 52.5 mg/dL to 55.0 mg/dL). </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi190042-3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d793254e368">Meaning</h5> <p id="d793254e370">Lipids and apolipoprotein B changed favorably in US youths during recent years.</p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi190042-4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d793254e374">Importance</h5> <p id="d793254e376">Favorable trends occurred in the lipid levels of US youths through 2010, but these trends may be altered by ongoing changes in the food supply, obesity prevalence, and other factors. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi190042-5"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d793254e379">Objective</h5> <p id="d793254e381">To analyze trends in levels of lipids and apolipoprotein B in US youths during 18 years from 1999 through 2016. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi190042-6"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d793254e384">Design, Setting, and Participants</h5> <p id="d793254e386">Serial cross-sectional analysis of US population–weighted data for youths aged 6 to 19 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys for 1999 through 2016. Linear temporal trends were analyzed using multivariable regression models with regression coefficients (β) reported as change per 1 year. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi190042-7"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d793254e389">Exposures</h5> <p id="d793254e391">Survey year; examined periods spanned 10 to 18 years based on data availability.</p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi190042-8"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d793254e394">Main Outcomes and Measures</h5> <p id="d793254e396">Age- and race/ethnicity-adjusted mean levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL), non-HDL, and total cholesterol. Among fasting adolescents (aged 12-19 years), mean levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, geometric mean levels of triglycerides, and mean levels of apolipoprotein B. Prevalence of ideal and adverse (vs borderline) levels of lipids and apolipoprotein B per pediatric lipid guidelines. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi190042-9"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d793254e399">Results</h5> <p id="d793254e401">In total, 26 047 youths were included (weighted mean age, 12.4 years; female, 51%). Among all youths, the adjusted mean total cholesterol level declined from 164 mg/dL (95% CI, 161 to 167 mg/dL) in 1999-2000 to 155 mg/dL (95% CI, 154 to 157 mg/dL) in 2015-2016 (β for linear trend, −0.6 mg/dL [95% CI, −0.7 to −0.4 mg/dL] per year). Adjusted mean HDL cholesterol level increased from 52.5 mg/dL (95% CI, 51.7 to 53.3 mg/dL) in 2007-2008 to 55.0 mg/dL (95% CI, 53.8 to 56.3 mg/dL) in 2015-2016 (β, 0.2 mg/dL [95% CI, 0.1 to 0.4 mg/dL] per year) and non-HDL cholesterol decreased from 108 mg/dL (95% CI, 106 to 110 mg/dL) to 100 mg/dL (95% CI, 99 to 102 mg/dL) during the same years (β, −0.9 mg/dL [95% CI, −1.2 to −0.6 mg/dL] per year). Among fasting adolescents, geometric mean levels of triglycerides declined from 78 mg/dL (95% CI, 74 to 82 mg/dL) in 1999-2000 to 63 mg/dL (95% CI, 58 to 68 mg/dL) in 2013-2014 (log-transformed β, −0.015 [95% CI, −0.020 to −0.010] per year), mean levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol declined from 92 mg/dL (95% CI, 89 to 95 mg/dL) to 86 mg/dL (95% CI, 83 to 90 mg/dL) during the same years (β, −0.4 mg/dL [95% CI, −0.7 to −0.2 mg/dL] per year), and mean levels of apolipoprotein B declined from 70 mg/dL (95% CI, 68 to 72 mg/dL) in 2005-2006 to 67 mg/dL (95% CI, 65 to 70 mg/dL) in 2013-2014 (β, −0.4 mg/dL [95% CI, −0.7 to −0.04 mg/dL] per year). Favorable trends were generally also observed in the prevalence of ideal and adverse levels. By the end of the study period, 51.4% (95% CI, 48.5% to 54.2%) of all youths had ideal levels for HDL, non-HDL, and total cholesterol; among adolescents, 46.8% (95% CI, 40.9% to 52.6%) had ideal levels for all lipids and apolipoprotein B, whereas 15.2% (95% CI, 13.1% to 17.3%) of children aged 6 to 11 years and 25.2% (95% CI, 22.2% to 28.2%) of adolescents aged 12 to 19 years had at least 1 adverse level. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi190042-10"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d793254e404">Conclusions and Relevance</h5> <p id="d793254e406">Between 1999 and 2016, favorable trends were observed in levels of lipids and apolipoprotein B in US youths aged 6 to 19 years. </p> </div><p class="first" id="d793254e409">This national survey study uses National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data from 1999-2016 to characterize trends in levels of lipids and apolipoprotein B in US youths aged 6 to 19 years. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Trends in cardiovascular health metrics and associations with all-cause and CVD mortality among US adults.

          Recent recommendations from the American Heart Association aim to improve cardiovascular health by encouraging the general population to meet 7 cardiovascular health metrics: not smoking; being physically active; having normal blood pressure, blood glucose and total cholesterol levels, and weight; and eating a healthy diet. To examine time trends in cardiovascular health metrics and to estimate joint associations and population-attributable fractions of these metrics in relation to all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality risk. Study of a nationally representative sample of 44,959 US adults (≥20 years), using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1988-1994, 1999-2004, and 2005-2010 and the NHANES III Linked Mortality File (through 2006). All-cause, CVD, and ischemic heart disease (IHD) mortality. Few participants met all 7 cardiovascular health metrics (2.0% [95% CI, 1.5%-2.5%] in 1988-1994, 1.2% [95% CI, 0.8%-1.9%] in 2005-2010). Among NHANES III participants, 2673 all-cause, 1085 CVD, and 576 IHD deaths occurred (median follow-up, 14.5 years). Among participants who met 1 or fewer cardiovascular health metrics, age- and sex-standardized absolute risks were 14.8 (95% CI, 13.2-16.5) deaths per 1000 person-years for all-cause mortality, 6.5 (95% CI, 5.5-7.6) for CVD mortality, and 3.7 (95% CI, 2.8-4.5) for IHD mortality. Among those who met 6 or more metrics, corresponding risks were 5.4 (95% CI, 3.6-7.3) for all-cause mortality, 1.5 (95% CI, 0.5-2.5) for CVD mortality, and 1.1 (95% CI, 0.7-2.0) for IHD mortality. Adjusted hazard ratios were 0.49 (95% CI, 0.33-0.74) for all-cause mortality, 0.24 (95% CI, 0.13-0.47) for CVD mortality, and 0.30 (95% CI, 0.13-0.68) for IHD mortality, comparing participants who met 6 or more vs 1 or fewer cardiovascular health metrics. Adjusted population-attributable fractions were 59% (95% CI, 33%-76%) for all-cause mortality, 64% (95% CI, 28%-84%) for CVD mortality, and 63% (95% CI, 5%-89%) for IHD mortality. Meeting a greater number of cardiovascular health metrics was associated with a lower risk of total and CVD mortality, but the prevalence of meeting all 7 cardiovascular health metrics was low in the study population.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cigarette smoking and serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations: an analysis of published data.

            To examine the association between cigarette smoking in adults and serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations the results of 54 published studies were analysed. Overall, smokers had significantly higher serum concentrations of cholesterol (3.0%), triglycerides (9.1%), very low density lipoprotein cholesterol (10.4%), and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (1.7%) and lower serum concentrations of high density lipoprotein cholesterol (-5.7%) and apolipoprotein AI (-4.2%) compared with nonsmokers. Among non-smokers and light, moderate, and heavy smokers a significant dose response effect was present for cholesterol (0, 1.8, 4.3, and 4.5% respectively), triglycerides (0, 10.7, 11.5, and 18.0%), very low density lipoprotein cholesterol (0, 7.2, 44.4, and 39.0%), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (0, -1.1, 1.4, and 11.0%), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (0, -4.6, -6.3, and -8.9%), and apolipoprotein AI (0, -3.7 and -5.7% in non-smokers and light and heavy smokers). These dose response effects may provide new evidence for a causal relation between exposure to cigarette smoke and changes in serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations whether as a direct result of physiological changes or of dietary changes induced by smoking. Adequate prospective data to estimate the excess risk of coronary artery disease existed only for cholesterol concentration. When that information was combined with data from the present study, and given that smokers as a group face an average overall excess risk of coronary artery disease of 70%, it was estimated that the observed increased serum cholesterol concentration in smokers may account for at least 9% of that excess risk. Furthermore, the dose response effect of smoking on serum cholesterol concentration suggests a gradient of increased absolute risk of coronary artery disease between light and heavy smokers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prevalence of and trends in dyslipidemia and blood pressure among US children and adolescents, 1999-2012.

              Recent national data suggest there were improvements in serum lipid concentrations among US children and adolescents between 1988 and 2010 but an increase in or stable blood pressure (BP) during a similar period.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA
                JAMA
                American Medical Association (AMA)
                0098-7484
                May 21 2019
                May 21 2019
                : 321
                : 19
                : 1895
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
                [2 ]Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
                [3 ]National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
                [4 ]Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
                [5 ]Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
                Article
                10.1001/jama.2019.4984
                6537842
                31112258
                2d0d5dc4-d88d-4cee-af96-e32c98886dc5
                © 2019
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article