Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of severe aortic stenosis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

Siontis, George C.M.; Praz, Fabien; Pilgrim, Thomas; Mavridis, Dimitris; Verma, Subodh; Salanti, Georgia; Søndergaard, Lars; Jüni, Peter; Windecker, Stephan

doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw225

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of severe aortic stenosis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

Author(s): George C.M. Siontis , Fabien Praz , Thomas Pilgrim , Dimitris Mavridis , Subodh Verma , Georgia Salanti , Lars Søndergaard , Peter Jüni , Stephan Windecker

Publication date Created: January 06 2017

Publication date (Electronic): July 07 2016

Journal: European Heart Journal

Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisher PubMed

Bookmark

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

In view of the currently available evidence from randomized trials, we aimed to compare the collective safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) vs. surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) across the spectrum of risk and in important subgroups.

Related collections

Most cited references 43

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: found

Is Open Access

The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

Julian P. T. Higgins, Douglas G. Altman, Peter C. Gøtzsche … (2014)

Flaws in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of randomised trials can cause the effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate