2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      To submit to this journal, please click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Feasibility and acceptability of a novel biomedical device to prevent neonatal hypothermia and augment Kangaroo Mother Care in Kenya: Qualitative analysis of focus group discussions and key Informant Interviews

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Hypothermia is a leading newborn complication, especially among premature and/or low birth weight infants. Within low/middle-income countries where incubators and radiant warmers are often in short supply, leading to gaps in the thermal care chain, neonatal hypothermia underlies high rates of newborn morbidity and mortality. Kangaroo Mother Care/Skin-to-skin care is an effective method for prevention of hypothermia in premature and low birthweight babies but can be very burdensome for families and healthcare providers. Our international multidisciplinary team has developed a prototype for a wearable biomedical device (“NeoWarm”) to provide continuous thermal care and augment kangaroo mother care practices in low-resource settings. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of NeoWarm and to obtain user design feedback for an early prototype from among adult end-users in Western Kenya. We performed key informant interviews (n = 17) among healthcare providers and 5 focus group discussions (FGDs) among 3 groups of adult stakeholders of premature babies, including: (1) parents/family members of premature babies aged 6 weeks or less (3 FGDs); (2) healthcare providers of newborns (e.g., nurses; physicians; 1 FGD); (3) community opinion leaders and stakeholders (e.g., traditional birth attendants; pastors; village elders; 1 FGD). Content and thematic analyses of transcripts indicate that NeoWarm is acceptable and feasible in promoting facility-based kangaroo mother care in the Kenyan setting. Novel findings derived from respondents include (1) the ability of the device to potentially overcome several barriers to traditional kangaroo mother care methods and (2) user-driven encouragement to expand the use case of the device to potentially include community-based kangaroo mother care and neonatal transport. User design feedback obtained during the interviews informed several key design iterations for subsequent prototypes of the device.

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

          Content analysis is a widely used qualitative research technique. Rather than being a single method, current applications of content analysis show three distinct approaches: conventional, directed, or summative. All three approaches are used to interpret meaning from the content of text data and, hence, adhere to the naturalistic paradigm. The major differences among the approaches are coding schemes, origins of codes, and threats to trustworthiness. In conventional content analysis, coding categories are derived directly from the text data. With a directed approach, analysis starts with a theory or relevant research findings as guidance for initial codes. A summative content analysis involves counting and comparisons, usually of keywords or content, followed by the interpretation of the underlying context. The authors delineate analytic procedures specific to each approach and techniques addressing trustworthiness with hypothetical examples drawn from the area of end-of-life care.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities.

            Community-based participatory research (CBPR) has emerged in the past decades as an alternative research paradigm, which integrates education and social action to improve health and reduce health disparities. More than a set of research methods, CBPR is an orientation to research that focuses on relationships between academic and community partners, with principles of colearning, mutual benefit, and long-term commitment and incorporates community theories, participation, and practices into the research efforts. As CBPR matures, tensions have become recognized that challenge the mutuality of the research relationship, including issues of power, privilege, participation, community consent, racial and/or ethnic discrimination, and the role of research in social change. This article focuses on these challenges as a dynamic and ever-changing context of the researcher-community relationship, provides examples of these paradoxes from work in tribal communities, discusses the evidence that CBPR reduces disparities, and recommends transforming the culture of academia to strengthen collaborative research relationships.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000–19: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals

              Summary Background Causes of mortality are a crucial input for health systems for identifying appropriate interventions for child survival. We present an updated series of cause-specific mortality for neonates and children younger than 5 years from 2000 to 2019. Methods We updated cause-specific mortality estimates for neonates and children aged 1–59 months, stratified by level (low, moderate, or high) of mortality. We made a substantial change in the statistical methods used for previous estimates, transitioning to a Bayesian framework that includes a structure to account for unreported causes in verbal autopsy studies. We also used systematic covariate selection in the multinomial framework, gave more weight to nationally representative verbal autopsy studies using a random effects model, and included mortality due to tuberculosis. Findings In 2019, there were 5·30 million deaths (95% uncertainty range 4·92–5·68) among children younger than 5 years, primarily due to preterm birth complications (17·7%, 16·1–19·5), lower respiratory infections (13·9%, 12·0–15·1), intrapartum-related events (11·6%, 10·6–12·5), and diarrhoea (9·1%, 7·9–9·9), with 49·2% (47·3–51·9) due to infectious causes. Vaccine-preventable deaths, such as for lower respiratory infections, meningitis, and measles, constituted 21·7% (20·4–25·6) of under-5 deaths, and many other causes, such as diarrhoea, were preventable with low-cost interventions. Under-5 mortality has declined substantially since 2000, primarily because of a decrease in mortality due to lower respiratory infections, diarrhoea, preterm birth complications, intrapartum-related events, malaria, and measles. There is considerable variation in the extent and trends in cause-specific mortality across regions and for different strata of all-cause under-5 mortality. Interpretation Progress is needed to improve child health and end preventable deaths among children younger than 5 years. Countries should strategize how to reduce mortality among this age group using interventions that are relevant to their specific causes of death. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; WHO.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: ValidationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLOS Glob Public Health
                PLOS Glob Public Health
                plos
                PLOS Global Public Health
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                2767-3375
                16 April 2024
                2024
                : 4
                : 4
                : e0001708
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Scholarly Concentration in Public Health Certificate Program, Indiana University School of Medicine and Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University–Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
                [2 ] Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, Eldoret, Kenya
                [3 ] Department of Community and Global Health, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University—Indianapolis and Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
                Jhpiego, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Dr. Sherri Bucher has been awarded intellectual property protection for invention of the NeoWarm biomedical device. This includes US patent US10390630B2, Nigeria NG/PT/C/2018/2802 and ARIPO patent PT/C/2018/2802. The author(s) declare no other potential conflicts of interest with respect to research, authorship, financial relationships, and/or publication of the article.

                [¤]

                Current address: Head, Community Outreach, International Cancer Institute, Eldoret, Kenya

                ‡ NAB and SL contributed equally to this work and are co-equal first authors.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4310-506X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1625-3662
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2342-6250
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3236-6421
                Article
                PGPH-D-23-00265
                10.1371/journal.pgph.0001708
                11020951
                38626201
                2eb27d02-8235-41dd-b9f8-6cb67adeebc2
                © 2024 Bhuiya et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 16 February 2023
                : 17 March 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 1, Pages: 20
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100006975, Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute;
                Award ID: UL1TR002529
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, Kenya
                Award Recipient :
                This project was funded with support from the Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, through an IU Center for Global Health Equity/Indiana CTSI Reciprocal Innovation Pilot Grant to Dr. Sherri Bucher (SLB; Indiana University School of Medicine) and Dr. David Muyodi (DM; Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, Kenya). Indiana CTSI is funded in part by Award Number UL1TR002529 from the National Institutes of Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Clinical and Translational Sciences Award. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Developmental Biology
                Neonates
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Maternal Health
                Neonatal Care
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pediatrics
                Neonatology
                Neonatal Care
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Neonatal Care
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Professions
                Medical Personnel
                Nurses
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Providers
                Nurses
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Facilities
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Physiology
                Physiological Parameters
                Body Temperature
                Engineering and Technology
                Technology Development
                Prototypes
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Providers
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Clinical Medicine
                Signs and Symptoms
                Hypothermia
                Custom metadata
                The human subjects ethical review boards of Indiana University, Indiana (IRB) and Moi University, Kenya (International Research Ethics Committee; IREC) do not permit publication of transcripts from key informant interviews or focus group discussions, due to the potential loss of confidentiality and privacy, even in de-identified transcripts. For additional information, please contact the Indiana University IRB at irb@ 123456iu.edu and the Moi University Institutional Research and Ethics Committee at irec@ 123456mtrh.go.ke .

                Comments

                Comment on this article