3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      National Trends in the Association of Race and Ethnicity With Predialysis Nephrology Care in the United States From 2005 to 2015

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This national registry study examines national trends in racial/ethnic disparities in the receipt of predialysis nephrology care at least 1 year before dialysis initiation among adults with end-stage kidney disease in the United States from 2005 to 2015.

          Key Points

          Question

          Have racial and ethnic disparities in the receipt of at least 12 months of predialysis nephrology care narrowed during the last decade in the United States?

          Findings

          In this cross-sectional study of national registry data for 1 000 390 US adults with end-stage kidney disease, receipt of at least 12 months of predialysis nephrology care increased overall from 2005 to 2015; however, disparities did not improve. In 2005 to 2007, compared with White adults, the odds of receiving predialysis nephrology care was lower by 18% among Black adults, 33% among Hispanic adults, and 16% among Asian adults; similar differences were observed in 2014 to 2015 (24% among Black adults, 39% among Hispanic adults, and 10% among Asian adults).

          Meaning

          This national study found that racial and ethnic disparities in receipt of at least 12 months of predialysis nephrology care did not improve from 2005 to 2015, suggesting that national strategies to address these disparities are needed.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Predialysis nephrology care is associated with better survival among patients with end-stage kidney disease.

          Objective

          To examine national trends in racial/ethnic disparities in receipt of predialysis nephrology care at least 1 year before dialysis initiation in the United States from 2005 to 2015.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This national registry study assessed US registry data of 1 000 390 adults in the US Renal Data System who initiated maintenance dialysis treatment from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2015, in multiple cross-sectional analyses. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine national trends in racial/ethnic disparities in receipt of predialysis nephrology care with adjustments for potential confounders. Data were analyzed April 17, 2020.

          Exposure

          Race/ethnicity of the patients.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Receipt of at least 12 months of predialysis nephrology care as determined by clinician-based documentation on the End Stage Renal Disease Medical Evidence Report Form CMS 2728.

          Results

          Among 1 000 390 adults (57.2% male; 54.6% White, 27.8% Black, 14.0% Hispanic, and 3.6% Asian; mean [SD] age, 62.4 [15.6] years) who initiated maintenance dialysis in the United States from 2005 to 2015, 310 743 (31.1%) received at least 12 months of predialysis nephrology care. In 2005 to 2007, compared with White adults, the adjusted odds ratio for receipt of at least 12 months of predialysis nephrology care was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.80-0.84) among Black adults, 0.67 (95% CI, 0.65-0.69) among Hispanic adults, and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.80-0.89) among Asian adults; in 2014 to 2015, the adjusted odds ratio was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.74-0.78) among Black adults, 0.61 (95% CI, 0.60-0.63) among Hispanic adults, and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86-0.95) among Asian adults.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          In this cross-sectional study of more than 1 million US adults with end-stage kidney disease, racial and ethnic disparities in predialysis nephrology care did not substantially improve from 2005 to 2015. Study findings suggest that national strategies to address racial/ethnic disparities in predialysis nephrology care are needed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Early referral to specialist nephrology services for preventing the progression to end-stage kidney disease.

          Early referral of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is believed to help with interventions to address risk factors to slow down the rate of progression of kidney failure to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and the need for dialysis, hospitalisation and mortality.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A propensity analysis of late versus early nephrologist referral and mortality on dialysis.

            Previous studies have analyzed the association between late versus early nephrologist referral (LR, ER) and poor clinical outcomes in patients with end-stage renal disease. We sought to determine whether these poor outcomes were causally related to LR, or whether LR was a proxy for poorer access to health care in general. An inception cohort of incident dialysis patients enrolled in the New Jersey Medicare or Medicaid programs was identified. Using a large number of demographic, clinical, and health care utilization covariates, propensity scores (PS) were then calculated to predict whether a given patient had been seen by a nephrologist at 90 d before first dialysis. Cox proportional hazards models were then built to test the association between timing of nephrologist referral and mortality during the first year of dialysis, using PS adjustment and matching to determine whether this association was confounded by other measures of reduced healthcare utilization. Neither adjustment for PS (HR = 1.31; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.47) nor matching (HR = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.59) materially changed the initial 36% excess mortality in LR compared with ER patients (HR = 1.36; 95% CI, 1.22 to 1.51). Excess mortality among LR was limited to the first 3 mo of dialysis (HR = 1.75; 95% CI, 1.48 to 2.08) but not present thereafter (HR = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.25). Late nephrologist referral is an independent risk factor for early death on dialysis, even after controlling for other indicators of healthcare utilization. Further research is needed to identify patients at particular risk so that interventions to prevent early deaths on dialysis in LR patients can be developed and tested.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Challenges perceived by primary care providers to educating patients about chronic kidney disease.

              To identify primary care providers' (PCPs) perceived barriers to educating patients about chronic kidney disease (CKD) during routine clinical visits. We conducted three focus groups of eighteen PCPs in Baltimore, Maryland (MD), USA. Focus groups began with the presentation of a hypothetical case of a patient with CKD, followed by open-ended questions to assess providers' perceived barriers to delivering education about CKD. Groups were audiotaped, transcribed and coded independently by two investigators who identified major themes. PCPs reported on several patient, provider and system level barriers contributing to poor education about CKD in primary care that were both common and unique to barriers previously reported in educating patients regarding other chronic diseases. Interventions designed to address barriers to CKD education identified by PCPs could improve the delivery of education about CKD in primary care settings. 2012 European Dialysis and Transplant Nurses Association/European Renal Care Association
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                27 August 2020
                August 2020
                27 August 2020
                : 3
                : 8
                : e2015003
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
                [2 ]Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
                [3 ]Johns Hopkins Center for Health Equity, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
                [4 ]Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
                [5 ]Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
                [6 ]Kidney and Hypertension Unit, Joslin Diabetes Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
                [7 ]Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: June 16, 2020.
                Published: August 27, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15003
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2020 Purnell TS et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Tanjala S. Purnell, PhD, MPH, Johns Hopkins Center for Health Equity, The Johns Hopkins University, 2024 E Monument St, Baltimore, MD 21205 ( tpurnel1@ 123456jhmi.edu ).
                Author Contributions: Drs Purnell and Segev had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Purnell, Luo, Johnson, Cooper, Henderson, Segev.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Purnell, Bae, Johnson, Crews, Greer, Rosas, Boulware.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Purnell, Johnson, Crews.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Purnell, Bae, Luo, Cooper, Henderson, Greer, Rosas, Boulware, Segev.
                Statistical analysis: Purnell, Bae, Luo.
                Obtained funding: Purnell, Segev.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Crews, Henderson, Rosas.
                Supervision: Segev.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
                Funding/Support: This study was supported by grant K01HS024600 (Dr Purnell [principal investigator {PI}]) from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; by grants K24DK101828 (Dr Segev [PI]), K01DK114388 (Dr Henderson [PI]), U01DK116102 (Dr Rosas [PI]), and R01DK098759 (Dr Boulware [PI]) from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; by grants UH3HL130688 (Dr Cooper [PI]) and K24HL148181 (Dr Crews [PI]) from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; by grants from the American Society of Nephrology (Dr Bae); and by a Doris Duke Early Clinician Investigator Award from the Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (Dr Greer).
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Disclaimer: The data reported herein have been supplied by the US Renal Data System. The interpretation and reporting of these data are the responsibility of the authors and in no way should be seen as an official policy of or interpretation by the US Renal Data System or the US government.
                Article
                zoi200559
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15003
                7453308
                32852554
                2ffed12d-6112-415b-b453-7d084466be41
                Copyright 2020 Purnell TS et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 24 November 2019
                : 16 June 2020
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Health Policy

                Comments

                Comment on this article