12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Postoperative pain after cesarean section: assessment and management in a tertiary hospital in a low-income country

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          There is little information about the current management of pain after obstetric surgery at Mulago hospital in Uganda, one of the largest hospitals in Africa with approximately 32,000 deliveries per year. The primary goal of this study was to assess the severity of post cesarean section pain. Secondary objectives were to identify analgesic medications used to control post cesarean section pain and resultant patient satisfaction.

          Methods

          We prospectively followed 333 women who underwent cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Subjective assessment of the participants’ pain was done using the Visual Analogue Scale (0 to 100) at 0, 6 and 24 h after surgery. Satisfaction with pain control was ascertained at 24 h after surgery using a 2-point scale (yes/no). Participants’ charts were reviewed for records of analgesics administered.

          Results

          Pain control medications used in the first 24 h following cesarean section at this hospital included diclofenac only, pethidine only, tramadol only and multiple pain medications. There were mothers who did not receive any analgesic medication. The highest pain scores were reported at 6 h (median: 37; (IQR:37.5). 68% of participants reported they were satisfied with their pain control.

          Conclusion

          Adequate management of post-cesarean section pain remains a challenge at Mulago hospital. Greater inter-professional collaboration, self-administered analgesia, scheduled prescription orders and increasing availability of analgesic drugs may contribute to improved treatment of postoperative pain with better pain scores.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Postoperative Pain Management among Surgically Treated Patients in an Ethiopian Hospital

          Background Incidence of postoperative pain has been reported to be between 47–100%. Ineffective postoperative pain management results in tangible and intangible costs. The purpose of this study was to assess the processes and outcomes of pain management in the surgical wards of Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia. Methods and Findings A prospective cross sectional study was conducted among 252 postoperative patients during February 13 to April 30, 2012. A contextually modified and validated (Cronbach’s α coefficient of 0.78) American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire was used to assess pain experience of patients. Patients’ charts were reviewed to assess the pattern of analgesic use. Incidence of postoperative pain was 91.4%, and remained high over 3 measurements (McNemar’s; p<0.05), and 80.1% of the patients were undertreated. The mean pain intensity, and pain interference on functional status were 6.72±1.44 and 5.61±1.13 on a 10 point Numerical rating scale respectively; both being strongly correlated(r = 0.86: p<0.001). Pain intensity was varied by ethnicity, education and preoperative information (ANOVA; P<0.05). Only 50% of the patients were adequately satisfied with their pain management. As needed (prn), solo analgesic, null analgesic, and intramuscular orders were noted for 31.3%, 89.29%, 9.7% and 20.1% of the prescription orders respectively. Though under dose, diclofenac and tramadol were the top prescribed medications, and only 57% of their dose was administered. Linear regression model showed that the predictors of satisfaction were sex of an individual and pain interference with functional status. Conclusion Despite patients’ paradoxical high satisfaction with pain management, the majority of patients were inadequately and inappropriately treated. Thus, further research is needed to determine how best to break down current barriers to effective pain management.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Analgesia after caesarean delivery.

            As the number of women giving birth by caesarean increases throughout most of the developed world, so too is research into postoperative pain relief for these women. Like most other post-surgical populations, the new mother needs effective pain relief so that she can mobilise early but she also has the added responsibility of needing to care for her newborn baby. There is no 'gold standard' for post-caesarean pain management; the number of options is large and the choice of method is at least partly determined by drug availability, regional and individual preferences, resource limitations and financial considerations. Most methods rely on opioids, supplemented with anti-inflammatory analgesics, nerve blocks or other adjunctive techniques. The aim of this review is to detail commonly used opioid-based methods and to review the evidence supporting non-opioid methods, when incorporated into a multimodal approach to post-caesarean pain management. Areas of promising research are also discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Recovery pattern and home-readiness after ambulatory surgery.

              F Chung (1995)
              Despite increased use of ambulatory surgery, few data exist regarding patient recovery patterns and home-readiness. We prospectively identified the pattern of home-readiness, the persistent symptoms after surgery, and the factors that delay discharge after home-readiness criteria are satisfied. Five hundred patients were scored by the same investigator using the Postanesthetic Discharge Scoring System (PADSS) every 30 min, commencing 30 min after surgery, until the PADSS score was > or = 9. The same investigator telephoned each patient 24 h after discharge to administer a standardized questionnaire so that postoperative symptoms could be identified. Eighty-two percent of patients were discharged 2 h and 95.6% 3 h after surgery. These patients could have been discharged earlier. After home-readiness criteria were satisfied, some patients had delayed discharge because of the unavailability of immediate escorts or the recurrence of pain. Persistent symptoms delaying discharge occurred in 4.4% of patients. Patients who underwent certain ambulatory surgical procedures, such as laparoscopy or orthopedic and general surgery, had a sixfold increased risk of developing persistent symptoms in the ambulatory surgery unit. The time to home-readiness was 2.5-fold longer and the incidence of 24-h postoperative symptoms, two- to eightfold higher in the group with persistent symptoms in the ambulatory surgery unit. In summary, periodic objective evaluation of home-readiness revealed that the majority of patients would achieve a satisfactory score on or before 2 h after surgery. The time to home-readiness by objective evaluation correlated with the type of surgery. Most delays after satisfactory home-readiness scores were reached were due to nonmedical reasons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                kintuug2012@gmail.com
                sadiq.abdulla@gmail.com
                aggreylub@googlemail.com
                mnabukenya@chs.mak.ac.ug
                lyzaigaga@gmail.com
                fredflybulamba@gmail.com
                semakuladaniel@gmail.com
                adeyemi.olufolabi@duke.edu
                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6963
                25 January 2019
                25 January 2019
                2019
                : 19
                : 68
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0620 0548, GRID grid.11194.3c, Department of Anesthesia, , Makerere University College of Health Sciences, ; Mulago, Uganda
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2288 9830, GRID grid.17091.3e, Department of Anesthesia, , University of British Columbia and BC Women’s Hospital, ; Vancouver, Canada
                [3 ]GRID grid.448602.c, Department of Anesthesia, , Busitema University Faculty of Health Sciences, ; Mbale, Uganda
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0620 0548, GRID grid.11194.3c, Innovations and Knowledge Translation Office, , Makerere University College of Health Sciences, ; Mulago, Uganda
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7961, GRID grid.26009.3d, Department of Anesthesia, , Duke University, ; Durham, NC USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5574-1215
                Article
                3911
                10.1186/s12913-019-3911-x
                6347795
                30683083
                30a61545-56a6-4da9-bf2a-497e7f893137
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 2 November 2015
                : 17 January 2019
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Health & Social care
                cesarean section,vas,postoperative pain,post-caesarean section pain,mulago hospital

                Comments

                Comment on this article