5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessment and Evaluation of Different Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Student Performance

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Student performance is crucial to the success of tertiary institutions. Especially, academic achievement is one of the metrics used in rating top-quality universities. Despite the large volume of educational data, accurately predicting student performance becomes more challenging. The main reason for this is the limited research in various machine learning (ML) approaches. Accordingly, educators need to explore effective tools for modelling and assessing student performance while recognizing weaknesses to improve educational outcomes. The existing ML approaches and key features for predicting student performance were investigated in this work. Related studies published between 2015 and 2021 were identified through a systematic search of various online databases. Thirty-nine studies were selected and evaluated. The results showed that six ML models were mainly used: decision tree (DT), artificial neural networks (ANNs), support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), linear regression (LinR), and Naive Bayes (NB). Our results also indicated that ANN outperformed other models and had higher accuracy levels. Furthermore, academic, demographic, internal assessment, and family/personal attributes were the most predominant input variables (e.g., predictive features) used for predicting student performance. Our analysis revealed an increasing number of research in this domain and a broad range of ML algorithms applied. At the same time, the extant body of evidence suggested that ML can be beneficial in identifying and improving various academic performance areas.

          Related collections

          Most cited references65

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

          David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods

            The limitations of traditional forms of systematic review in making optimal use of all forms of evidence are increasingly evident, especially for policy-makers and practitioners. There is an urgent need for robust ways of incorporating qualitative evidence into systematic reviews.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Educational Data Mining: A Review of the State of the Art

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Comput Intell Neurosci
                Comput Intell Neurosci
                cin
                Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
                Hindawi
                1687-5265
                1687-5273
                2022
                9 May 2022
                : 2022
                : 4151487
                Affiliations
                1Department of Computer Science, College of Science, Northern Border University, Arar, Saudi Arabia
                2Faculty of Computing and Informatics, Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS), Labuan, Malaysia
                3Faculty of Computer Science and Information Systems, Thamar University, Yemen
                4College of Graduate Studies, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Kajang 43000, Malaysia
                5Institute of Sustainable Energy (ISE), Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Kajang 43000, Malaysia
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: Ahmed Mostafa Khalil

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1359-6336
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8004-3929
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2456-4033
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3117-062X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2067-9519
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5653-2482
                Article
                10.1155/2022/4151487
                9110122
                35586111
                30fd8e46-e247-4af8-8415-6e21152fd5b9
                Copyright © 2022 Yazan A. Alsariera et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 17 December 2021
                : 7 March 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Ministry of Education
                Award ID: IF-2020-102
                Categories
                Review Article

                Neurosciences
                Neurosciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article