7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Decoding Imagined and Spoken Phrases From Non-invasive Neural (MEG) Signals

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Speech production is a hierarchical mechanism involving the synchronization of the brain and the oral articulators, where the intention of linguistic concepts is transformed into meaningful sounds. Individuals with locked-in syndrome (fully paralyzed but aware) lose their motor ability completely including articulation and even eyeball movement. The neural pathway may be the only option to resume a certain level of communication for these patients. Current brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) use patients' visual and attentional correlates to build communication, resulting in a slow communication rate (a few words per minute). Direct decoding of imagined speech from the neural signals (and then driving a speech synthesizer) has the potential for a higher communication rate. In this study, we investigated the decoding of five imagined and spoken phrases from single-trial, non-invasive magnetoencephalography (MEG) signals collected from eight adult subjects. Two machine learning algorithms were used. One was an artificial neural network (ANN) with statistical features as the baseline approach. The other was convolutional neural networks (CNNs) applied on the spatial, spectral and temporal features extracted from the MEG signals. Experimental results indicated the possibility to decode imagined and spoken phrases directly from neuromagnetic signals. CNNs were found to be highly effective with an average decoding accuracy of up to 93% for the imagined and 96% for the spoken phrases.

          Related collections

          Most cited references69

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects.

          One of the most robust experience-related cortical dynamics is reduced neural activity when stimuli are repeated. This reduction has been linked to performance improvements due to repetition and also used to probe functional characteristics of neural populations. However, the underlying neural mechanisms are as yet unknown. Here, we consider three models that have been proposed to account for repetition-related reductions in neural activity, and evaluate them in terms of their ability to account for the main properties of this phenomenon as measured with single-cell recordings and neuroimaging techniques. We also discuss future directions for distinguishing between these models, which will be important for understanding the neural consequences of repetition and for interpreting repetition-related effects in neuroimaging data.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Moving magnetoencephalography towards real-world applications with a wearable system

            Summary Imaging human brain function with techniques such as magnetoencephalography1 (MEG) typically requires a subject to perform tasks whilst their head remains still within a restrictive scanner. This artificial environment makes the technique inaccessible to many people, and limits the experimental questions that can be addressed. For example, it has been difficult to apply neuroimaging to investigation of the neural substrates of cognitive development in babies and children, or in adult studies that require unconstrained head movement (e.g. spatial navigation). Here, we develop a new type of MEG system that can be worn like a helmet, allowing free and natural movement during scanning. This is possible due to the integration of new quantum sensors2,3 that do not rely on superconducting technology, with a novel system for nulling background magnetic fields. We demonstrate human electrophysiological measurement at millisecond resolution whilst subjects make natural movements, including head nodding, stretching, drinking and playing a ball game. Results compare well to the current state-of-the-art, even when subjects make large head movements. The system opens up new possibilities for scanning any subject or patient group, with myriad applications such as characterisation of the neurodevelopmental connectome, imaging subjects moving naturally in a virtual environment, and understanding the pathophysiology of movement disorders.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Deep learning-based electroencephalography analysis: a systematic review

              Electroencephalography (EEG) is a complex signal and can require several years of training, as well as advanced signal processing and feature extraction methodologies to be correctly interpreted. Recently, deep learning (DL) has shown great promise in helping make sense of EEG signals due to its capacity to learn good feature representations from raw data. Whether DL truly presents advantages as compared to more traditional EEG processing approaches, however, remains an open question.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Neurosci
                Front Neurosci
                Front. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-4548
                1662-453X
                07 April 2020
                2020
                : 14
                : 290
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Texas at Austin , Austin, TX, United States
                [2] 2Department of Neurology, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin , Austin, TX, United States
                [3] 3MEG Lab, Dell Children's Medical Center , Austin, TX, United States
                [4] 4Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin , Austin, TX, United States
                [5] 5Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Texas at Austin , Austin, TX, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Hasan Ayaz, Drexel University, United States

                Reviewed by: Damien Coyle, Ulster University, United Kingdom; Masayuki Hirata, Osaka University, Japan

                *Correspondence: Jun Wang jun.wang@ 123456austin.utexas.edu

                This article was submitted to Neural Technology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience

                Article
                10.3389/fnins.2020.00290
                7154084
                32317917
                31110a4f-d6ba-4f0a-b153-c2e9f1f09bd2
                Copyright © 2020 Dash, Ferrari and Wang.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 11 August 2019
                : 13 March 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 9, Tables: 2, Equations: 1, References: 80, Pages: 15, Words: 11647
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002
                Award ID: R01DC016621
                Award ID: R03DC013990
                Funded by: University of Texas System 10.13039/100007130
                Award ID: 362221
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Original Research

                Neurosciences
                meg,speech,brain-computer interface,wavelet,convolutional neural network,neural technology

                Comments

                Comment on this article