1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mode of Death after Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) might be a lifesaving therapy for patients with cardiac arrest and no return of spontaneous circulation during advanced life support. However, even with ECPR, mortality of these severely sick patients is high. Little is known on the exact mode of death in these patients. Methods: Retrospective registry analysis of all consecutive patients undergoing ECPR between May 2011 and May 2020 at a single center. Mode of death was judged by two researchers. Results: A total of 274 ECPR cases were included (age 60.0 years, 47.1% shockable initial rhythm, median time-to-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) 53.8min, hospital survival 25.9%). The 71 survivors had shorter time-to-ECMO durations (46.0 ± 27.9 vs. 56.6 ± 28.8min, p < 0.01), lower initial lactate levels (7.9 ± 4.5 vs. 11.6 ± 8.4 mg/dL, p < 0.01), higher PREDICT-6h (41.7 ± 17.0% vs. 25.3 ± 19.0%, p < 0.01), and SAVE (0.4 ± 4.8 vs. −0.8 ± 4.4, p < 0.01) scores. Most common mode of death in 203 deceased patients was therapy resistant shock in 105/203 (51.7%) and anoxic brain injury in 69/203 (34.0%). Comparing patients deceased with shock to those with cerebral damage, patients with shock were significantly older (63.2 ± 11.5 vs. 54.3 ± 16.5 years, p < 0.01), more frequently resuscitated in-hospital (64.4% vs. 29.9%, p < 0.01) and had shorter time-to-ECMO durations (52.3 ± 26.8 vs. 69.3 ± 29.1min p < 0.01). Conclusions: Most patients after ECPR decease due to refractory shock. Older patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest might be prone to development of refractory shock. Only a minority die from cerebral damage. Research should focus on preventing post-CPR shock and treating the shock in these patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care.

            To determine the incidence, cost, and outcome of severe sepsis in the United States. Observational cohort study. All nonfederal hospitals (n = 847) in seven U.S. states. All patients (n = 192,980) meeting criteria for severe sepsis based on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification. None. We linked all 1995 state hospital discharge records (n = 6,621,559) from seven large states with population and hospital data from the U.S. Census, the Centers for Disease Control, the Health Care Financing Administration, and the American Hospital Association. We defined severe sepsis as documented infection and acute organ dysfunction using criteria based on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification. We validated these criteria against prospective clinical and physiologic criteria in a subset of five hospitals. We generated national age- and gender-adjusted estimates of incidence, cost, and outcome. We identified 192,980 cases, yielding national estimates of 751,000 cases (3.0 cases per 1,000 population and 2.26 cases per 100 hospital discharges), of whom 383,000 (51.1%) received intensive care and an additional 130,000 (17.3%) were ventilated in an intermediate care unit or cared for in a coronary care unit. Incidence increased >100-fold with age (0.2/1,000 in children to 26.2/1,000 in those >85 yrs old). Mortality was 28.6%, or 215,000 deaths nationally, and also increased with age, from 10% in children to 38.4% in those >85 yrs old. Women had lower age-specific incidence and mortality, but the difference in mortality was explained by differences in underlying disease and the site of infection. The average costs per case were $22,100, with annual total costs of $16.7 billion nationally. Costs were higher in infants, nonsurvivors, intensive care unit patients, surgical patients, and patients with more organ failure. The incidence was projected to increase by 1.5% per annum. Severe sepsis is a common, expensive, and frequently fatal condition, with as many deaths annually as those from acute myocardial infarction. It is especially common in the elderly and is likely to increase substantially as the U.S. population ages.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The global survival rate among adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

              Background To quantitatively summarize the available epidemiological evidence on the survival rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Methods We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases, and the references of retrieved articles were manually reviewed to identify studies reporting the outcome of OHCA patients who received CPR. The overall incidence and outcome of OHCA were assessed using a random-effects meta-analysis. Results A total of 141 eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled incidence of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was 29.7% (95% CI 27.6–31.7%), the rate of survival to hospital admission was 22.0% (95% CI 20.7–23.4%), the rate of survival to hospital discharge was 8.8% (95% CI 8.2–9.4%), the pooled 1-month survival rate was 10.7% (95% CI 9.1–13.3%), and the 1-year survival rate was 7.7% (95% CI 5.8–9.5%). Subgroup analysis showed that survival to hospital discharge was more likely among OHCA patients whose cardiac arrest was witnessed by a bystander or emergency medical services (EMS) (10.5%; 95% CI 9.2–11.7%), who received bystander CPR (11.3%, 95% CI 9.3–13.2%), and who were living in Europe and North America (Europe 11.7%; 95% CI 10.5–13.0%; North America: 7.7%; 95% CI 6.9–8.6%). The survival to discharge (8.6% in 1976–1999 vs. 9.9% in 2010–2019), 1-month survival (8.0% in 2000–2009 vs. 13.3% in 2010–2019), and 1-year survival (8.0% in 2000–2009 vs. 13.3% in 2010–2019) rates of OHCA patients who underwent CPR significantly increased throughout the study period. The Egger’s test did not indicate evidence of publication bias for the outcomes of OHCA patients who underwent CPR. Conclusions The global survival rate of OHCA patients who received CPR has increased in the past 40 years. A higher survival rate post-OHCA is more likely among patients who receive bystander CPR and who live in Western countries. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-020-2773-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Membranes (Basel)
                Membranes (Basel)
                membranes
                Membranes
                MDPI
                2077-0375
                08 April 2021
                April 2021
                : 11
                : 4
                : 270
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Cardiology and Angiology I (Heart Center Freiburg—Bad Krozingen), Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany; corinna.nadine.lang@ 123456uniklinik-freiburg.de (C.N.L.); xavier.bemtgen@ 123456uniklinik-freiburg.de (X.B.); markus.jaeckel@ 123456uniklinik-freiburg.de (M.J.); annabelle.fluegler@ 123456uniklinik-freiburg.de (A.F.); jonathan.rilinger@ 123456uniklinik-freiburg.de (J.R.); christoph.bode@ 123456uniklinik-freiburg.de (C.B.); alexander.supady@ 123456uniklinik-freiburg.de (A.S.); tobias.wengenmayer@ 123456uniklinik-freiburg.de (T.W.); dawid.staudacher@ 123456uniklinik-freiburg.de (D.L.S.)
                [2 ]Department of Medicine III (Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care), Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
                [3 ]Department of Cardiovascular Surgery (University Heart Center Freiburg—Bad Krozingen), Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany; christoph.benk@ 123456uniklinik-freiburg.de
                [4 ]Institute of Global Health, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: e-mail: viviane.zotzmann@ 123456universitaets-herzzentrum.de ; Tel.: +49-(0)761-270-34010
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1335-4732
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8638-5228
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9333-3629
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3659-0407
                Article
                membranes-11-00270
                10.3390/membranes11040270
                8068242
                33917888
                31c274f5-1dd0-4d67-8b1f-f10c3e9172f0
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 13 March 2021
                : 06 April 2021
                Categories
                Article

                ecpr,extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation,cpr,resuscitation,mode of death,withdrawal from therapy,hemodynamic shock,brain death

                Comments

                Comment on this article