9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      [Prehospital diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction in Vestfold].

      Tidsskrift for den Norske lægeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny række
      Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Ambulances, Cohort Studies, Electrocardiography, Emergency Medical Service Communication Systems, Emergency Medical Services, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, diagnosis, drug therapy, mortality, Norway, epidemiology, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Thrombolytic Therapy, adverse effects, Treatment Outcome

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Pre-hospital thrombolysis is a relatively new treatment modality in Norway. The present study is a county-based evaluation of the first phase of this procedure after its introduction in 2002. This is a retrospective cohort study of all patients who, over a nine-month period, had a pre-hospital ECG taken by paramedics and transmitted to the county's two coronary care units. The medical records of all patients who received pre-hospital thrombolysis were analysed and compared with those who received in-hospital thrombolysis over the same period. A pre-hospital ECG was successfully taken and transmitted in 840 patients. Pre-hospital thrombolytic therapy was given to 45 (5.4%) patients, of whom 38 (84%) developed ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Over the same period, 32 patients received in-hospital thrombolysis, of whom 28 (87%) developed STEMI. Among the 738 hospitalised patients who did not receive pre-hospital thrombolytic therapy, 218 (28%) had a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome, 258 (35%) had established coronary heart disease but no evidence of coronary ischaemia, while 262 (36%) had no evidence of coronary heart disease at all. Median call-to-thrombolysis time was 42 minutes (range 21-75). The findings indicate good paramedical pre-hospital routines with short call-to-thrombolysis-time, but the routines for pre-hospital ECG and thrombolytic therapy need reassessment.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article