11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Shrinking windows of opportunity for oak seedling establishment in southern California mountains

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The arcsine is asinine: the analysis of proportions in ecology

          The arcsine square root transformation has long been standard procedure when analyzing proportional data in ecology, with applications in data sets containing binomial and non-binomial response variables. Here, we argue that the arcsine transform should not be used in either circumstance. For binomial data, logistic regression has greater interpretability and higher power than analyses of transformed data. However, it is important to check the data for additional unexplained variation, i.e., overdispersion, and to account for it via the inclusion of random effects in the model if found. For non-binomial data, the arcsine transform is undesirable on the grounds of interpretability, and because it can produce nonsensical predictions. The logit transformation is proposed as an alternative approach to address these issues. Examples are presented in both cases to illustrate these advantages, comparing various methods of analyzing proportions including untransformed, arcsine- and logit-transformed linear models and logistic regression (with or without random effects). Simulations demonstrate that logistic regression usually provides a gain in power over other methods.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Rapid shifts in plant distribution with recent climate change.

            A change in climate would be expected to shift plant distribution as species expand in newly favorable areas and decline in increasingly hostile locations. We compared surveys of plant cover that were made in 1977 and 2006-2007 along a 2,314-m elevation gradient in Southern California's Santa Rosa Mountains. Southern California's climate warmed at the surface, the precipitation variability increased, and the amount of snow decreased during the 30-year period preceding the second survey. We found that the average elevation of the dominant plant species rose by approximately 65 m between the surveys. This shift cannot be attributed to changes in air pollution or fire frequency and appears to be a consequence of changes in regional climate.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Mapping species distributions

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ecosphere
                Ecosphere
                Wiley
                21508925
                November 2016
                November 2016
                November 10 2016
                : 7
                : 11
                : e01573
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Bren School of Environmental Science and Management; University of California; Santa Barbara California 93106 USA
                [2 ]Center for Conservation Biology; University of California; Riverside California 92521 USA
                [3 ]Harvard Forest; Harvard University; Petersham Massachusetts 01377 USA
                [4 ]School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning; Arizona State University; PO Box 875302 Tempe Arizona 85287 USA
                [5 ]California Water Science Center; USGS; 6000 J Street Sacramento California 95819 USA
                [6 ]California Air Resources Board; 1001 I Street Sacramento California 95812 USA
                [7 ]Biology Department; University of California; Riverside California 92521 USA
                [8 ]Conservation Biology Institute; 10423 Sierra Vista Avenue La Mesa California 91941 USA
                [9 ]The Moore Center for Science, Conservation International; 2011 Crystal Drive Arlington Virginia 22202 USA
                [10 ]Desert Research Institute; Reno Nevada 89512 USA
                [11 ]Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management; Division of Ecosystem Sciences; University of California, Berkeley; 130 Mulford Hall Berkeley California 94720 USA
                Article
                10.1002/ecs2.1573
                32cf6eb5-6e99-43cd-b546-bb2c56ae7adc
                © 2016

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article