1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Transitional Probabilities Are Prioritized over Stimulus/Pattern Probabilities in Auditory Deviance Detection: Memory Basis for Predictive Sound Processing

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Representations encoding the probabilities of auditory events do not directly support predictive processing. In contrast, information about the probability with which a given sound follows another (transitional probability) allows predictions of upcoming sounds. We tested whether behavioral and cortical auditory deviance detection (the latter indexed by the mismatch negativity event-related potential) relies on probabilities of sound patterns or on transitional probabilities. We presented healthy adult volunteers with three types of rare tone-triplets among frequent standard triplets of high-low-high (H-L-H) or L-H-L pitch structure: proximity deviant (H-H-H/L-L-L), reversal deviant (L-H-L/H-L-H), and first-tone deviant (L-L-H/H-H-L). If deviance detection was based on pattern probability, reversal and first-tone deviants should be detected with similar latency because both differ from the standard at the first pattern position. If deviance detection was based on transitional probabilities, then reversal deviants should be the most difficult to detect because, unlike the other two deviants, they contain no low-probability pitch transitions. The data clearly showed that both behavioral and cortical auditory deviance detection uses transitional probabilities. Thus, the memory traces underlying cortical deviance detection may provide a link between stimulus probability-based change/novelty detectors operating at lower levels of the auditory system and higher auditory cognitive functions that involve predictive processing.

          SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Our research presents the first definite evidence for the auditory system prioritizing transitional probabilities over probabilities of individual sensory events. Forming representations for transitional probabilities paves the way for predictions of upcoming sounds. Several recent theories suggest that predictive processing provides the general basis of human perception, including important auditory functions, such as auditory scene analysis. Our results demonstrate that the memory traces underlying cortical deviance detection form a link between stimulus probability-based change/novelty detectors operating at lower levels of the auditory system and higher auditory cognitive functions that involve predictive processing.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Neurosci
          J. Neurosci
          jneuro
          jneurosci
          J. Neurosci
          The Journal of Neuroscience
          Society for Neuroscience
          0270-6474
          1529-2401
          14 September 2016
          : 36
          : 37
          : 9572-9579
          Affiliations
          [1] 1Institute for Learning & Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195,
          [2] 2Cognitive Brain Research Unit, Cognitive Science, Institute of Behavioural Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland, and
          [3] 3Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, H-1519 Budapest, Hungary
          Author notes
          Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. István Winkler, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, H-1519 Budapest, P.O. Box 286, Hungary. winkler.istvan@ 123456ttk.mta.hu

          Author contributions: R.T. and I.W. designed research; M.M. performed research; M.M. contributed unpublished reagents/analytic tools; M.M. analyzed data; M.M., R.T., and I.W. wrote the paper.

          Author information
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6566-1016
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3344-6151
          Article
          PMC6601944 PMC6601944 6601944 1041-16
          10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1041-16.2016
          6601944
          27629709
          33133830-70d2-4ad7-9e0e-57c3f8d81c68
          Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/369572-08$15.00/0
          History
          : 29 March 2016
          : 19 July 2016
          : 25 July 2016
          Categories
          Articles
          Behavioral/Cognitive

          auditory memory,transitional probability,stimulus-specific adaptation,predictive processing,mismatch negativity

          Comments

          Comment on this article