Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Use of sequence analysis for classifying individual antidepressant trajectories to monitor population mental health

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Over the past decade, antidepressant prescriptions have increased in European countries and the United States, partly due to an increase in the number of new cases of mental illness. This paper demonstrates an innovative approach to the classification of population level change in mental health status, using administrative data for a large sample of the Scottish population. We aimed to identify groups of individuals with similar patterns of change in pattern of prescribing, validate these groups by comparison with other indicators of mental illness, and characterise the population most at risk of increasing mental ill health.

          Methods

          National Health Service (NHS) prescription data were linked to the Scottish Longitudinal Study (SLS), a 5.3% sample of the Scottish population ( N = 151,418). Antidepressant prescription status over the previous 6 months was recorded for every month for which data were available (January 2009–December 2014), and sequence dissimilarity was computed by optimal matching. Hierarchical clustering was used to create groups of participants who had similar patterns of change, with multi-level logistic regression used to understand group membership.

          Results

          Five distinct prescription pattern groups were observed, indicating: no prescriptions (76%), occasional prescriptions (10%), continuation of prior use of prescriptions (8%), a new course of prescriptions started (4%) or ceased taking prescriptions (3%). Young, white, female participants, of low social grade, residing in socially deprived neighbourhoods, living alone, being separated/divorced or out of the labour force, were more likely to be in the group that started a new course of antidepressant prescriptions.

          Conclusions

          The use of sequence analysis for classifying individual antidepressant trajectories offers a novel approach for capturing population-level changes in mental health risk. By classifying individuals into groups based on their anti-depressant medication use we can better identify how over time, mental health is associated with individual risk factors and contextual factors at the local level and the macro political and economic scale.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Trends in Prescription Drug Use Among Adults in the United States From 1999-2012.

          It is important to document patterns of prescription drug use to inform both clinical practice and research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Analyzing and Visualizing State Sequences inRwithTraMineR

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              ‘First, do no harm’: are disability assessments associated with adverse trends in mental health? A longitudinal ecological study

              Background In England between 2010 and 2013, just over one million recipients of the main out-of-work disability benefit had their eligibility reassessed using a new functional checklist—the Work Capability Assessment. Doctors and disability rights organisations have raised concerns that this has had an adverse effect on the mental health of claimants, but there are no population level studies exploring the health effects of this or similar policies. Method We used multivariable regression to investigate whether variation in the trend in reassessments in each of 149 local authorities in England was associated with differences in local trends in suicides, self-reported mental health problems and antidepressant prescribing rates, while adjusting for baseline conditions and trends in other factors known to influence mental ill-health. Results Each additional 10 000 people reassessed in each area was associated with an additional 6 suicides (95% CI 2 to 9), 2700 cases of reported mental health problems (95% CI 548 to 4840), and the prescribing of an additional 7020 antidepressant items (95% CI 3930 to 10100). The reassessment process was associated with the greatest increases in these adverse mental health outcomes in the most deprived areas of the country, widening health inequalities. Conclusions The programme of reassessing people on disability benefits using the Work Capability Assessment was independently associated with an increase in suicides, self-reported mental health problems and antidepressant prescribing. This policy may have had serious adverse consequences for mental health in England, which could outweigh any benefits that arise from moving people off disability benefits.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                mark.cherrie@ed.ac.uk
                Journal
                BMC Psychiatry
                BMC Psychiatry
                BMC Psychiatry
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-244X
                23 November 2020
                23 November 2020
                2020
                : 20
                : 551
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.4305.2, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7988, School of GeoSciences, , The University of Edinburgh, ; Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
                [2 ]GRID grid.410343.1, ISNI 0000 0001 2224 0230, Institute of Occupational Medicine, ; Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
                [3 ]GRID grid.8250.f, ISNI 0000 0000 8700 0572, Department of Geography, , Durham University, ; Durham, UK
                [4 ]GRID grid.508718.3, Public Health Scotland, ; Edinburgh, UK
                [5 ]GRID grid.1006.7, ISNI 0000 0001 0462 7212, School of Geography, Politics & Sociology, , Newcastle University, ; Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
                [6 ]GRID grid.413893.4, ISNI 0000 0001 2232 4338, Health Protection Scotland, ; Glasgow, UK
                [7 ]GRID grid.4305.2, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7988, Scottish Centre for Administrative Data Research, , University of Edinburgh, ; Edinburgh, UK
                [8 ]GRID grid.1006.7, ISNI 0000 0001 0462 7212, Population Health Sciences Institute, , Newcastle University, ; Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2822-9459
                Article
                2952
                10.1186/s12888-020-02952-y
                7684902
                33228576
                3349aa47-06d3-42e1-946d-2b6165a6d81d
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 17 January 2020
                : 15 November 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000269, Economic and Social Research Council;
                Award ID: ES/P008585/1
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                public health monitoring,health service use,administrative data,prescriptions,antidepressants,mental health,sequence analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article