Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Competition between bound and free peptides in an ELISA-based procedure that assays peptides derived from protein digests

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          We describe an ELISA-based method that can be used to identify and quantitate proteins in biological samples. In this method, peptides in solution, derived from proteolytic digests of the sample, compete with substrate-attached synthetic peptides for antibodies, also in solution, generated against the chosen peptides. The peptides used for the ELISA are chosen on the basis of their being (i) products of the proteolytic (e.g. tryptic) digestion of the protein to be identified and (ii) unique to the target protein, as far as one can know from the published sequences.

          Results

          In this paper we describe the competition assay and we define the optimal conditions for the most effective assay. We have performed an analysis of the kinetics of interaction between the four components of the assay: the plastic substratum to which the peptide is bound, the bound peptide itself, the competing added peptide, and the antibody that is specific for the peptide and we compare the results of theoretical simulations to the actual data in some model systems.

          Conclusion

          The data suggest that the peptides bind to the plastic substratum in more than one conformation and that, once bound, the peptide displays different affinities for the antibody, depending on how it has bound to the plate

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Competition BIAcore for measuring true affinities: large differences from values determined from binding kinetics.

          In attempting to use the BIAcore instrument for the determination of binding constants of several haptens or peptides to different antibodies by measuring on- and off-rates, we found that neither the absolute nor the relative values of the binding constants corresponded to the measurements in solution. Even at the lowest coupling densities useful for measurements, rebinding and bivalency effects offset the measurements by a factor of up to 500. We caution therefore about using on- and off-rates for the determination of absolute or even relative binding constants without controlling for rebinding and avidity effects. Instead, we show that binding constants in solution can be reproduced well by using on-rate determinations of antibody preincubated with antigen, and we derive the conditions under which such an approach is valid.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Solid supports for microarray immunoassays.

            Stimulated by the achievements of the first phase in genomics and the resulting need of assigning functions to the acquired sequence information, novel formats of immunoassays are being developed for high-throughput multi-analyte studies. In principle, they are similar in nature to the microarray assays already established at the level of nucleic acids. However, the biochemical diversity and the sheer number of proteins are such that an equivalent analysis is much more complex and thus difficult to accomplish. The wide range of protein concentration complicates matters further. Performing microarray immunoassays already represents a challenge at the level of preparing a working chip surface. Arrays have been produced on filter supports, in microtiter plate wells and on glass slides, the last two usually coated with one-, two- or three-dimensionally structured surface modifications. The usefulness and suitability of all these support media for the construction and application of antibody microarrays are reviewed in this manuscript in terms of the different kinds of immunoassay and the various detection procedures. Additionally, the employment of microarrays containing alternative sensor molecules is discussed in this context. The sensitivity of microspot immunoassays predicted by the current analyte theory is not yet a reality, indicating the extent of both the technology's potential and the size of the task still ahead. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The ELISA guidebook.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proteome Sci
                Proteome Science
                BioMed Central (London )
                1477-5956
                2006
                31 May 2006
                : 4
                : 12
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Biological Chemistry, Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
                [2 ]MDR Tests Ltd, 28 Pierre Koenig St, Jerusalem, Israel
                Article
                1477-5956-4-12
                10.1186/1477-5956-4-12
                1482681
                16737525
                336147bc-d957-4916-bf0e-8356ef43c8f6
                Copyright © 2006 Braitbard et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 7 February 2006
                : 31 May 2006
                Categories
                Methodology

                Molecular biology
                Molecular biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article