7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Local participation and partnership development in Canada's Arctic research: challenges and opportunities in an age of empowerment and self-determination

      , ,
      Polar Record
      Cambridge University Press (CUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          An important component of northern research in Canada has been a strong emphasis on local participation. However, the policy and permit landscape for community participation therein is heterogeneous and presents specific challenges in promoting effective partnerships between researchers and local participants. We conducted a survey of northern research stakeholders across Canada in order better to understand the benefits and challenges associated with research partnerships with a view to informing northern research policy and practice. We found that local engagement at the proposal and research design phases, the hiring of community researchers and engagement of local persons at the results dissemination phase were important factors affecting success. Respondents also indicated a lack of social capital (trust and reciprocity) between researchers and communities as placing a negative impact on science partnerships. Overall, researchers were perceived to benefit more from research partnerships than their community counterparts. Partnerships in northern research will possibly require further decentralisation of power to achieve the policy objectives of local community participation. This could be achieved, in part, by allowing non-academic principal investigators to receive funding, or by involving communities in research priority-setting, proposal review and funding allocation processes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Evidence and Implications of Recent Climate Change in Northern Alaska and Other Arctic Regions

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Adaptive monitoring: a new paradigm for long-term research and monitoring.

            Long-term research and monitoring can provide important ecological insights and are crucial for the improved management of ecosystems and natural resources. However, many long-term research and monitoring programs are either ineffective or fail completely owing to poor planning and/or lack of focus. Here we propose the paradigm of adaptive monitoring, which aims to resolve many of the problems that have undermined previous attempts to establish long-term research and monitoring. This paradigm is driven by tractable questions, rigorous statistical design at the outset, a conceptual model of the ecosystem or other entity being examined and a human need to know about ecosystem change. An adaptive monitoring framework enables monitoring programs to evolve iteratively as new information emerges and research questions change.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Science's new social contract with society.

              Under the prevailing contract between science and society, science has been expected to produce 'reliable' knowledge, provided merely that it communicates its discoveries to society. A new contract must now ensure that scientific knowledge is 'socially robust', and that its production is seen by society to be both transparent and participative.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                applab
                Polar Record
                Polar Record
                Cambridge University Press (CUP)
                0032-2474
                1475-3057
                May 2016
                January 2016
                : 52
                : 03
                : 345-359
                Article
                10.1017/S003224741500090X
                3372789b-8124-461f-94c4-1c4cc1e07f78
                © 2016
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article