19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references155

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.

          Viral epidemics or pandemics of acute respiratory infections like influenza or severe acute respiratory syndrome pose a global threat. Antiviral drugs and vaccinations may be insufficient to prevent their spread. To review the effectiveness of physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses. We searched The Cochrane Library, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2010, Issue 3), which includes the Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialised Register, MEDLINE (1966 to October 2010), OLDMEDLINE (1950 to 1965), EMBASE (1990 to October 2010), CINAHL (1982 to October 2010), LILACS (2008 to October 2010), Indian MEDLARS (2008 to October 2010) and IMSEAR (2008 to October 2010). In this update, two review authors independently applied the inclusion criteria to all identified and retrieved articles and extracted data. We scanned 3775 titles, excluded 3560 and retrieved full papers of 215 studies, to include 66 papers of 67 studies. We included physical interventions (screening at entry ports, isolation, quarantine, social distancing, barriers, personal protection, hand hygiene) to prevent respiratory virus transmission. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohorts, case-controls, before-after and time series studies. We used a standardised form to assess trial eligibility. We assessed RCTs by randomisation method, allocation generation, concealment, blinding and follow up. We assessed non-RCTs for potential confounders and classified them as low, medium and high risk of bias. We included 67 studies including randomised controlled trials and observational studies with a mixed risk of bias. A total number of participants is not included as the total would be made up of a heterogenous set of observations (participant people, observations on participants and countries (object of some studies)). The risk of bias for five RCTs and most cluster-RCTs was high. Observational studies were of mixed quality. Only case-control data were sufficiently homogeneous to allow meta-analysis. The highest quality cluster-RCTs suggest respiratory virus spread can be prevented by hygienic measures, such as handwashing, especially around younger children. Benefit from reduced transmission from children to household members is broadly supported also in other study designs where the potential for confounding is greater. Nine case-control studies suggested implementing transmission barriers, isolation and hygienic measures are effective at containing respiratory virus epidemics. Surgical masks or N95 respirators were the most consistent and comprehensive supportive measures. N95 respirators were non-inferior to simple surgical masks but more expensive, uncomfortable and irritating to skin. Adding virucidals or antiseptics to normal handwashing to decrease respiratory disease transmission remains uncertain. Global measures, such as screening at entry ports, led to a non-significant marginal delay in spread. There was limited evidence that social distancing was effective, especially if related to the risk of exposure. Simple and low-cost interventions would be useful for reducing transmission of epidemic respiratory viruses. Routine long-term implementation of some measures assessed might be difficult without the threat of an epidemic.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Contamination of Health Care Personnel During Removal of Personal Protective Equipment.

            Contamination of the skin and clothing of health care personnel during removal of personal protective equipment (PPE) contributes to dissemination of pathogens and places personnel at risk for infection.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cluster trials in implementation research: estimation of intracluster correlation coefficients and sample size.

              The cluster randomized trial with a concurrent economic evaluation is considered the gold standard evaluative design for the conduct of implementation research evaluating different strategies to promote the transfer of research findings into clinical practice. This has implications for the planning of such studies, as information is needed on the effects of clustering on both effectiveness and efficiency outcomes. This paper describes the design considerations specific to implementation research studies, focusing particularly on the estimation of sample size requirements and on the need for reliable information on intracluster correlation coefficients for both effectiveness and efficiency outcomes. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                146518
                Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
                Wiley
                14651858
                May 15 2020
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Cochrane Work Review Group; Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam; Amsterdam Netherlands
                [2 ]School of Pharmacy; University of Eastern Finland; Kuopio Finland
                [3 ]Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School; University of Bristol; Bristol UK
                [4 ]University of Tampere; Tampere Finland
                [5 ]Galway Ireland
                [6 ]Centre for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences; Queen's University Belfast; Belfast UK
                [7 ]Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; TYÖTERVEYSLAITOS Finland
                [8 ]Assessment of Pharmacotherapies; Finnish Medicines Agency; Kuopio Finland
                [9 ]National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory (NPPTL), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); Pittsburgh PA USA
                Article
                10.1002/14651858.CD011621.pub5
                32293717
                33ddf064-efc8-4c67-ad5d-a709f6bf154b
                © 2020
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article