0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      A pilot study to determine if the use of a virtual reality education module reduces anxiety and increases comprehension in patients receiving radiation therapy

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The information needs of new radiotherapy patients: how to measure? Do they want to know everything? And if not, why?

          To establish 1) further psychometric properties of the information preference for radiotherapy patients scale (IPRP); 2) what information new radiotherapy patients want to receive; 3) which patients have a lower information need. Eligible patients (n = 159; response rate 54%) of 15 radiation oncologists completed the IPRP and provided background characteristics before their first radiotherapy consultation. Exclusion criteria were: age <18 years, having undergone radiotherapy before, unable to read and write Dutch, cognitive problems or a brain tumor. Reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.84-0.97) and concurrent validity (r from .39 to .57, p < 0.001) of the subscales of the IPRP were good. New radiotherapy patients want extensive information about their disease, treatment, procedures, side effects, and prognosis (mean scores between 4.1 and 4.4 on a scale from 1 to 5) but less information about psychosocial issues (mean = 3.4). Patients who are older and male, have lung or rectal cancer, more difficulty understanding and a higher trait anxiety level, need less information. The IPRP can reliably and validly address information needs of patients undergoing radiation treatment. Most new radiotherapy patients want much information. Yet, information giving should be tailored according to their background, understanding and anxiety. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Psychological stress: Psychoanalytic and behavioral studies of surgical patients.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effects of information supply on satisfaction with information and quality of life in cancer patients receiving curative radiation therapy.

              In order to test the efficacy of various information inputs, 210 consecutive cancer patients were randomized to one of three information conditions before the start of curative radiation treatment: (1) standard information plus group and repeated individual information (n=70), (2) standard information plus brochure (n=70), and (3) standard information only (n=70). Patients completed questions regarding satisfaction with information, anxiety, depression, subjective distress and quality of life at inclusion, and 1h before the start of the radiation therapy treatment (approximately 4 weeks later). Patients receiving standard information plus group and repeated individual information were significantly more satisfied with the information than were patients in the remaining two groups. There were no differences with respect to any of the other outcome measures. This study has shown that the nurses group and individual information was of significant importance in preparing the patients for the procedure of receiving radiation therapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Radiation Oncology
                J Radiat Oncol
                Springer Nature
                1948-7894
                1948-7908
                September 2017
                March 22 2017
                : 6
                : 3
                : 317-322
                Article
                10.1007/s13566-017-0298-3
                343b5997-2c19-44fd-9f9c-e7f786dfcdfd
                © 2017

                http://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article