26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Avoidant Responses to Interpersonal Provocation Are Associated with Increased Amygdala and Decreased Mentalizing Network Activity

      research-article
      1 , 2 , , 3 , 1 , 2
      eNeuro
      Society for Neuroscience

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Visual Abstract

          Abstract

          When intentionally pushed or insulted, one can either flee from the provoker or retaliate. The implementation of such fight-or-flight decisions is a central aspect in the genesis and evolution of aggression episodes, yet it is usually investigated only indirectly or in nonsocial situations. In the present fMRI study, we aimed to distinguish brain regions associated with aggressive and avoidant responses to interpersonal provocation in humans. Participants (thirty-six healthy young women) could either avoid or face a highly (HP) and a lowly (LP) provoking opponent in a competitive reaction time task: the fight-or-escape (FOE) paradigm. Subjects avoided the HP more often, but retaliated when facing her. Moreover, they chose to fight the HP more quickly, and showed increased heart rate (HR) right before confronting her. Orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and sensorimotor cortex were more active when participants decided to fight, whereas the mentalizing network was engaged when deciding to avoid. Importantly, avoiding the HP relative to the LP was associated with both higher activation in the right basolateral amygdala and lower relative activity in several mentalizing regions [e.g., medial and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), temporal-parietal junction (TPJ)]. These results suggest that avoidant responses to provocation might result from heightened threat anticipation and are associated with reduced perspective taking. Furthermore, our study helps to reconcile conflicting findings on the role of the mentalizing network, the amygdala, and the OFC in aggression.

          Related collections

          Most cited references112

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Human aggression.

            Research on human aggression has progressed to a point at which a unifying framework is needed. Major domain-limited theories of aggression include cognitive neoassociation, social learning, social interaction, script, and excitation transfer theories. Using the general aggression model (GAM), this review posits cognition, affect, and arousal to mediate the effects of situational and personological variables on aggression. The review also organizes recent theories of the development and persistence of aggressive personality. Personality is conceptualized as a set of stable knowledge structures that individuals use to interpret events in their social world and to guide their behavior. In addition to organizing what is already known about human aggression, this review, using the GAM framework, also serves the heuristic function of suggesting what research is needed to fill in theoretical gaps and can be used to create and test interventions for reducing aggression.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Attentional bias in emotional disorders.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                eNeuro
                eNeuro
                eneuro
                eneuro
                eNeuro
                eNeuro
                Society for Neuroscience
                2373-2822
                26 June 2017
                27 June 2017
                May-Jun 2017
                : 4
                : 3
                : ENEURO.0337-16.2017
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck , Lübeck 23562, Germany
                [2 ]Institute of Psychology II, University of Lübeck , Lübeck 23562, Germany
                [3 ]Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London , London WC1N 3AR, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                The authors declare no competing financial interests.

                Author contributions: M.B.-R., F.B., and U.M.K. designed research; M.B.-R. performed research; M.B.-R. and U.M.K. analyzed data; M.B.-R., F.B., and U.M.K. wrote the paper.

                This work was supported by the German Science Foundation Grant 32 KR3691/5-1. We acknowledge financial support by Land Schleswig-Holstein within the funding program Open Access Publikationsfonds.

                Correspondence should be addressed to Macià Buades-Rotger, M.Sc., Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Lübeck 23562, Germany, E-mail: macia.rotger@ 123456neuro.uni-luebeck.de .
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1219-9216
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1628-7651
                Article
                eN-NWR-0337-16
                10.1523/ENEURO.0337-16.2017
                5485378
                28660251
                347b7ed2-b291-4e1c-80d8-db148a9c1f04
                Copyright © 2017 Buades-Rotger et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

                History
                : 8 November 2016
                : 19 May 2017
                : 6 June 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 107, Pages: 16, Words: 12937
                Funding
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
                Award ID: 501100001659
                Award ID: KR3691/5-1
                Categories
                1
                1.1
                New Research
                Cognition and Behavior
                Custom metadata
                May/June 2017

                Comments

                Comment on this article