8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Environmental sustainability of European production and consumption assessed against planetary boundaries

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The planetary boundaries (PBs) represent a well-known concept, which helps identify whether production and consumption systems are environmentally sustainable in absolute terms, namely compared to the Earth's ecological limits and carrying capacity. In this study, the impacts of production and consumption of the European Union in 2010 were assessed by means of life cycle assessment (LCA)-based indicators and compared with the PBs. Five different perspectives were adopted for assessing the impacts: a production perspective (EU Domestic Footprint) and four distinct consumption perspectives, resulting from alternative modelling approaches including both top-down (input-output LCA) and bottom-up (process-based LCA). Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) results were assessed against LCIA-based PBs, which adapted the PBs framework to the LCIA indicators and metrics of the Environmental Footprint method (EF). Global environmental impacts transgressed several LCIA-based PBs. When assessing the overall environmental impacts of EU consumption compared to the global LCIA-based PBs, impacts of EU consumption related to climate change, particulate matter, land use and mineral resources were close or already transgressed the global boundaries. The EU, with less than 10% of the world population, was close to transgress the global ecological limits. Moreover, when downscaling the global PBs and comparing the impacts per capita for an average EU citizen and a global one, the LCIA-PBs were significantly transgressed in many impact categories. The results are affected by uncertainty mainly due to: (a) the intrinsic uncertainties of the different LCA modelling approaches and indicators; (b) the uncertainties in estimating LCIA-based PBs, due to the difficulties in identifying limits for the Earth's processes and referring them to LCIA metrics. The results may anyway be used to define benchmarks and policy targets to ensure that consumption and production in Europe remains within safe ecological boundaries, as well as to understand the magnitude of the effort needed to reduce the impacts.

          Graphical abstract

          Highlights

          • Planetary Boundaries help quantify the environmental sustainability of consumption.

          • We developed LCIA-based planetary boundaries for evaluating the EU consumption.

          • EU consumption occupies a high share of the safe operating space globally available.

          • Planetary boundaries are fundamental to support policy making towards sustainability.

          • LCA-based planetary boundaries show intrinsic uncertainties.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet

          The planetary boundaries framework defines a safe operating space for humanity based on the intrinsic biophysical processes that regulate the stability of the Earth system. Here, we revise and update the planetary boundary framework, with a focus on the underpinning biophysical science, based on targeted input from expert research communities and on more general scientific advances over the past 5 years. Several of the boundaries now have a two-tier approach, reflecting the importance of cross-scale interactions and the regional-level heterogeneity of the processes that underpin the boundaries. Two core boundaries—climate change and biosphere integrity—have been identified, each of which has the potential on its own to drive the Earth system into a new state should they be substantially and persistently transgressed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Sharing a quota on cumulative carbon emissions

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Environ Manage
                J. Environ. Manage
                Journal of Environmental Management
                Academic Press
                0301-4797
                1095-8630
                01 September 2020
                01 September 2020
                : 269
                : 110686
                Affiliations
                [1]European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via E. Fermi 2749, 21027, Ispra, Italy
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. serenella.sala@ 123456ec.europa.eu
                Article
                S0301-4797(20)30618-6 110686
                10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110686
                7315131
                32560978
                34b1aff8-fa74-4565-b2f8-96ff3423260c
                © 2020 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 3 June 2019
                : 21 April 2020
                : 30 April 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Environmental management, Policy & Planning
                consumption patterns,impact assessment,life cycle assessment based indicator,sustainable development goals,absolute sustainability,carrying capacity

                Comments

                Comment on this article