15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Beyond Biology: The Crucial Role of Sex and Gender in Oncology

      Submit here before July 31, 2024

      About Oncology Research and Treatment: 2.4 Impact Factor I 3.3 CiteScore I 0.495 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Malignant Glioma as a Secondary Malignant Neoplasm after Radiation Therapy for Craniopharyngioma. Report of a Case and Review of Reported Cases

      case-report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: The development of a secondary neoplasm in childhood cancer survivors attains growing importance due to the reported excellent survival and therefore the long exposure to potentially carcinogenic effects of treatment. Case Report: We report a 14-year-old girl in whom a large craniopharyngioma (CP) was diagnosed. After surgery, radiation therapy (RT) was given for residual tumour. Discrete progression necessitated further surgery, resulting in permanent tumour control. Soon after the second surgery hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction developed together with obesity. Supportive hormone therapy was initiated. Growth hormone (GH) therapy was also given for 15 months. Four years after the diagnosis, a cerebropontine anaplastic astrocytoma WHO grade III was detected, with the main lesion being at the dorsal edge of the irradiated area. The girl died 1 month later from this secondary presumably radiation-induced tumour. Only recently a second child with RT for a CP was diagnosed with malignant glioma in our hospital. Case Reports in the Literature: 12 other cases of malignant glioma have been reported after RT for CP. Including our present cases, the mean latency period was 10.7 years (median 9.6 years). However, the shortest latency periods were found in patients who had received GH therapy. In numerous cases, the secondary tumour was seen at the edge of the irradiated volume, and not in the region with the highest absorbed dose. Conclusions: Therapy-induced secondary gliomas after treatment of CP or other intracranial tumours are rare but dramatic late events with a very poor prognosis. Including our own 2 patients, we reviewed 14 cases of CP with occurrence of a secondary, probably radiation-induced malignant glioma. The short latency periods for patients treated with GH is remarkable. We therefore suspect that GH therapy may accelerate the development of a secondary brain tumour. We are reluctant to recommend GH therapy in conventionally irradiated CP patients. In order to seriously answer the questions about therapy-induced secondary neoplasms, a life-long follow-up is mandatory for all patients who are survivors of childhood cancer.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          ONK
          Oncol Res Treat
          10.1159/issn.2296-5270
          Oncology Research and Treatment
          S. Karger AG
          2296-5270
          2296-5262
          2001
          February 2001
          02 March 2001
          : 24
          : 1
          : 66-72
          Affiliations
          aInstitut für Radiotherapie und Radio.Onkologie, bAbteilung für Kinderheilkunde, cNeuropathologisches Institut, eInstitut für Nuklearmedizin und Endokrinologie, St.-Johannes-Spital; dAbteilung für Neurochirurgie, Christian-Doppler-Klinik, Landeskliniken Salzburg
          Article
          50285 Onkologie 2001;24:66–72
          10.1159/000050285
          11441284
          35bf0f20-35a6-425b-a5b1-f453219f43bc
          © 2001 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          History
          Page count
          Pages: 7
          Categories
          Casuistic Contribution · Kasuistik

          Oncology & Radiotherapy,Pathology,Surgery,Obstetrics & Gynecology,Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine,Hematology

          Comments

          Comment on this article