2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Young Children Selectively Imitate Models Conforming to Social Norms

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study investigated whether toddlers would selectively imitate a demonstrator who exhibits familiarity with cultural practices in their tool-using habits over a demonstrator who consistently uses tools in an unconventional way. Three-year-old children ( n = 45) watched videos depicting two models, one of whom performed tool-using actions in a conventional way, while the other model deviated from social conventions. Then, both models introduced a technique to build a tower (differing in one element). Moreover, the context of the demonstration was also manipulated: in one condition, the models expressed their teaching intentions, while in the other they performed the actions without communicative signals. Children were more willing to copy the actions of the conventionally behaving model, irrespective of the context of the demonstration.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Rational imitation in preverbal infants.

          Here we show that if an adult demonstrates a new way to execute a task to a group of infants aged 14 months, the children will use this action to achieve the same goal only if they consider it to be the most rational alternative. Our results indicate that imitation of goal-directed action by preverbal infants is a selective, interpretative process, rather than a simple re-enactment of the means used by a demonstrator, as was previously thought.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Preschoolers mistrust ignorant and inaccurate speakers.

            Being able to evaluate the accuracy of an informant is essential to communication. Three experiments explored preschoolers' (N=119) understanding that, in cases of conflict, information from reliable informants is preferable to information from unreliable informants. In Experiment 1, children were presented with previously accurate and inaccurate informants who presented conflicting names for novel objects. 4-year-olds-but not 3-year-olds-predicted whether an informant would be accurate in the future, sought, and endorsed information from the accurate over the inaccurate informant. In Experiment 2, both age groups displayed trust in knowledgeable over ignorant speakers. In Experiment 3, children extended selective trust when learning both verbal and nonverbal information. These experiments demonstrate that preschoolers have a key strategy for assessing the reliability of information.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Trust in testimony: children's use of true and false statements.

              The extent to which young children monitor and use the truth of assertions to gauge the reliability of subsequent testimony was examined. Three- and 4-year-old children were presented with two informants, an accurate labeler and an inaccurate labeler. They were then invited to learn names for novel objects from these informants. The children correctly monitored and identified the informants on the basis of the truth of their prior labeling. Furthermore, children who explicitly identified the unreliable or reliable informant across two tasks went on to demonstrate selective trust in the novel information provided by the previously reliable informant. Children who did not consistently identify the unreliable or reliable informant proved indiscriminate.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                26 June 2019
                2019
                : 10
                : 1399
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Department of Cognitive Psychology, MTA-ELTE Momentum Social Minds Research Group, Eötvös Loránd University , Budapest, Hungary
                [2] 2 Psychobiological Research Group, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Hungarian Academy of Sciences , Budapest, Hungary
                [3] 3 Cognitive Development Center, Central European University , Budapest, Hungary
                Author notes

                Edited by: Gabrielle Strouse, University of South Dakota, United States

                Reviewed by: Katherine O’Doherty, University of Chicago, United States; Mark Nielsen, University of Queensland, Australia

                *Correspondence: Katalin Oláh, olah.katalin@ 123456ppk.elte.hu

                This article was submitted to Developmental Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01399
                6606772
                36524b25-e9fa-43fa-9001-70bc0381660b
                Copyright © 2019 Oláh and Király.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 23 February 2019
                : 29 May 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 43, Pages: 8, Words: 7090
                Funding
                Funded by: Hungarian Scientific Research Fund 10.13039/501100003549
                Award ID: OTKA 109 352
                Funded by: Momentum program of The Hungarian Academy of Sciences
                Award ID: LP-2017-17/2017
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                social learning,conventionality,norms,social categorization,imitation

                Comments

                Comment on this article