56
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      A Social Information Processing Approach to Job Attitudes and Task Design

      ,
      Administrative Science Quarterly
      JSTOR

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This article outlines a social information processing approach to explain job attitudes. In comparison with need-satisfaction and expectancy models to job attitudes and motivation, the social information processing perspective emphasizes the effects of context and the consequences of past choices, rather than individual predispositions and rational decision-making processes. When an individual develops statements about attitude or needs, he or she uses social information--information about past behavior and about what others think. The process of attributing attitudes or needs from behavior is itself affected by commitment processes, by the saliency and relevance of information, and by the need to develop socially acceptable and legitimate rationalizations for actions. Both attitudes and need statements, as well as characterizations of jobs, are affected by informational social influence. The implications of the social information processing perspective for organization development efforts and programs of job redesign are discussed.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Administrative Science Quarterly
          Administrative Science Quarterly
          JSTOR
          00018392
          June 1978
          June 1978
          : 23
          : 2
          : 224
          Article
          10.2307/2392563
          10307892
          36a33780-7157-41b4-890f-71c61f46cb28
          © 1978
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article