3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Clinical Challenges and Considerations

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Although many approaches have been developed for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that has both high incidence and high mortality especially in Asian countries, the prognosis of HCC patients is still dismal. Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors show encouraging efficacy and have already been widely applied in clinic. However, in contrast to traditional therapies, immunotherapy brings many challenges when using in a real world, including biomarker discovery, response evaluation, adverse event treatment, etc. In this review, we proposed some important and intractable issues in current clinical practice regarding the strategy of immune checkpoint blockade, collected current evidence, and discuss the critical challenges and possible approaches to a bright future.

          Related collections

          Most cited references92

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

          The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab showed encouraging antitumor activity and safety in a phase 1b trial involving patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

            No effective systemic therapy exists for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. A preliminary study suggested that sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, the platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and Raf may be effective in hepatocellular carcinoma. In this multicenter, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 602 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who had not received previous systemic treatment to receive either sorafenib (at a dose of 400 mg twice daily) or placebo. Primary outcomes were overall survival and the time to symptomatic progression. Secondary outcomes included the time to radiologic progression and safety. At the second planned interim analysis, 321 deaths had occurred, and the study was stopped. Median overall survival was 10.7 months in the sorafenib group and 7.9 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio in the sorafenib group, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.55 to 0.87; P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the median time to symptomatic progression (4.1 months vs. 4.9 months, respectively, P=0.77). The median time to radiologic progression was 5.5 months in the sorafenib group and 2.8 months in the placebo group (P<0.001). Seven patients in the sorafenib group (2%) and two patients in the placebo group (1%) had a partial response; no patients had a complete response. Diarrhea, weight loss, hand-foot skin reaction, and hypophosphatemia were more frequent in the sorafenib group. In patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, median survival and the time to radiologic progression were nearly 3 months longer for patients treated with sorafenib than for those given placebo. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00105443.) 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1–based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors

              Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis induce sustained clinical responses in a sizeable minority of cancer patients. Here, we show that primary resistance to ICI can be due to abnormal gut microbiome composition. Antibiotics (ATB) inhibited the clinical benefit of ICI in patients with advanced cancer. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from cancer patients who responded to ICI (but not from non-responding patients) into germ-free or ATB-treated mice ameliorated the antitumor effects of PD-1 blockade. Metagenomics of patient stools at diagnosis revealed correlations between clinical responses to ICI and the relative abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila. Oral supplementation with A. muciniphila post-FMT with non-responder feces restored the efficacy of PD-1 blockade in an IL-12-dependent manner, by increasing the recruitment of CCR9+CXCR3+CD4+ T lymphocytes into tumor beds.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Oncol
                Front Oncol
                Front. Oncol.
                Frontiers in Oncology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2234-943X
                15 October 2020
                2020
                : 10
                : 590058
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine , Hangzhou, China
                [2] 2 Innovation Center for the Study of Pancreatic Diseases of Zhejiang Province , Hangzhou, China
                [3] 3 Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases , Hangzhou, China
                [4] 4 Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease of Zhejiang Province , Hangzhou, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Ka On Lam, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

                Reviewed by: Shuji Ogino, Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, United States; Ali Coskun, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Turkey

                *Correspondence: Xueli Bai, shirleybai@ 123456zju.edu.cn ; Tingbo Liang, liangtingbo@ 123456zju.edu.cn

                This article was submitted to Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology

                Article
                10.3389/fonc.2020.590058
                7593704
                33178615
                37228b65-57ae-4818-82bc-3e4254969a71
                Copyright © 2020 Zhang, Chen, Bai and Liang

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 10 September 2020
                : 28 September 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 93, Pages: 9, Words: 5327
                Funding
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China 10.13039/501100001809
                Categories
                Oncology
                Review

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                liver cancer,biomarker,response evaluation,adjuvant therapy,immune checkpoint inhibitor

                Comments

                Comment on this article