46
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Incubator management experiences engaging with public SMME financiers at national and provincial levels in South Africa

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND: Public funding agencies are governmental funding organs tasked with supplying developmental finance to prospective and emerging entrepreneurs. These agencies focus on bridging the finance gap between investors and entrepreneurs, overcoming strict collateral and own contribution needs. Given South Africa's standing as a developing country, public funding agencies play a pivotal role in enfranchising and empowering emerging entrepreneurs from impoverished sectors of South African society PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The study's objective was to document the experiences that incubator managers have with public small, medium and micro-enterprise financiers at a national and provincial level. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A qualitative research design was used in this study. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews that were recorded and transcribed. The sample consisted of 17 business incubator managers from separate business incubators all over South Africa. A combination of convenience, homogenous purposive and snowball sampling were employed. RESULTS/FINDINGS: Findings revealed that negative experiences between public funding agencies and business incubators were poor lead times on applications, complicated application processes, strict funding requirements, ineffective financing and ineffective staff. Furthermore, findings revealed that positive experiences between public funding agencies and business incubators were improved credibility and higher chances of funding success when applicants are under the auspices of the business incubator. MANAGERIAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Critical shortcomings in public funding agencies' funding processes were documented, and public funders have been advised to adopt a standardised list of funding requirements, improve communication with incubators and improve staff competencies JEL CLASSIFICATION: L26

          Related collections

          Most cited references171

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing

          In the course of our supervisory work over the years we have noticed that qualitative research tends to evoke a lot of questions and worries, so-called frequently asked questions (FAQs). This series of four articles intends to provide novice researchers with practical guidance for conducting high-quality qualitative research in primary care. By ‘novice’ we mean Master’s students and junior researchers, as well as experienced quantitative researchers who are engaging in qualitative research for the first time. This series addresses their questions and provides researchers, readers, reviewers and editors with references to criteria and tools for judging the quality of qualitative research papers. The first article provides an introduction to this series. The second article focused on context, research questions and designs. The third article focused on sampling, data collection and analysis. This fourth article addresses FAQs about trustworthiness and publishing. Quality criteria for all qualitative research are credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. Reflexivity is an integral part of ensuring the transparency and quality of qualitative research. Writing a qualitative research article reflects the iterative nature of the qualitative research process: data analysis continues while writing. A qualitative research article is mostly narrative and tends to be longer than a quantitative paper, and sometimes requires a different structure. Editors essentially use the criteria: is it new, is it true, is it relevant? An effective cover letter enhances confidence in the newness, trueness and relevance, and explains why your study required a qualitative design. It provides information about the way you applied quality criteria or a checklist, and you can attach the checklist to the manuscript.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Characteristics of Qualitative Descriptive Studies: A Systematic Review.

            Qualitative description (QD) is a term that is widely used to describe qualitative studies of health care and nursing-related phenomena. However, limited discussions regarding QD are found in the existing literature. In this systematic review, we identified characteristics of methods and findings reported in research articles published in 2014 whose authors identified the work as QD. After searching and screening, data were extracted from the sample of 55 QD articles and examined to characterize research objectives, design justification, theoretical/philosophical frameworks, sampling and sample size, data collection and sources, data analysis, and presentation of findings. In this review, three primary findings were identified. First, although there were some inconsistencies, most articles included characteristics consistent with the limited available QD definitions and descriptions. Next, flexibility or variability of methods was common and effective for obtaining rich data and achieving understanding of a phenomenon. Finally, justification for how a QD approach was chosen and why it would be an appropriate fit for a particular study was limited in the sample and, therefore, in need of increased attention. Based on these findings, recommendations include encouragement to researchers to provide as many details as possible regarding the methods of their QD studies so that readers can determine whether the methods used were reasonable and effective in producing useful findings. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Attempting rigour and replicability in thematic analysis of qualitative research data; a case study of codebook development

              Background Navigating the world of qualitative thematic analysis can be challenging. This is compounded by the fact that detailed descriptions of methods are often omitted from qualitative discussions. While qualitative research methodologies are now mature, there often remains a lack of fine detail in their description both at submitted peer reviewed article level and in textbooks. As one of research’s aims is to determine the relationship between knowledge and practice through the demonstration of rigour, more detailed descriptions of methods could prove useful. Rigour in quantitative research is often determined through detailed explanation allowing replication, but the ability to replicate is often not considered appropriate in qualitative research. However, a well described qualitative methodology could demonstrate and ensure the same effect. Methods This article details the codebook development which contributed to thematic analysis of qualitative data. This analysis formed part of a mixed methods multiphase design research project, with both qualitative and quantitative inquiry and involving the convergence of data and analyses. This design consisted of three distinct phases: quantitative, qualitative and implementation phases. Results and conclusions This article is aimed at researchers and doctoral students new to thematic analysis by describing a framework to assist their processes. The detailed description of the methods used supports attempts to utilise the thematic analysis process and to determine rigour to support the establishment of credibility. This process will assist practitioners to be confident that the knowledge and claims contained within research are transferable to their practice. The approach described within this article builds on, and enhances, current accepted models.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                jcm
                Journal of Contemporary Management
                JCMAN
                JCMAN (Meyerton, Gauteng, South Africa )
                1815-7440
                2022
                : 19
                : 1
                : 1-42
                Affiliations
                [02] orgnameUniversity of Pretoria orgdiv1Department of Business Management South Africa alex1@ 123456up.ac.za
                [01] orgnameSol Plaatje University orgdiv1Department of Business Management South Africa johann.vanderspuy@ 123456spu.ac.za
                Article
                S1815-74402022000100014 S1815-7440(22)01900100014
                10.35683/jcm21071.149
                372bfb52-bc9d-4e58-8136-082278e6431d

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 194, Pages: 42
                Product

                SciELO South Africa


                public funding agencies,entrepreneurship,entrepreneurial developmental finance,Business incubator,governmental finance

                Comments

                Comment on this article