1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      3M microfoam™ surgical tape prevents nasal pressure injury associated with nasotracheal intubation: A randomized double-blind trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Background:

          3M microfoam™ surgical tape (3ST: 3M Japan Limited) is used for pressure wound control of medical equipment. It is cushioned and can be fitted to any body part. Here we investigated whether 3ST prevents nasal pressure injury associated with nasotracheal intubation (NTI).

          Methods:

          We conducted a prospective, randomized double-blind study, enrolling 63 patients aged 20 to 70 years, who underwent general anesthesia with NTI. They were divided into 2 groups; those treated with 3ST (group S; n = 31) and control (group C; n = 31). After NTI and before securing the nasotracheal tube, a 35 × 25 mm 3ST was used to protect the nasal wing in group S, and the nasotracheal tube was fixed in place after NTI without protection in group C. The primary outcome was the presence or absence of nasal pressure injury after extubation. The Chi-Square test was used to assess the association between the 2 categorical variables.

          Results:

          Nasal pressure injury was observed in 7 and 19 patients from groups S and C, respectively, representing a significant difference between the 2 groups (24.1% vs 67.8%, P = .001). Remarkably, none of the patients developed ulcers.

          Conclusion:

          3ST prevents nasal pressure injury associated with NTI.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Revised National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Pressure Injury Staging System

          Our understanding of pressure injury etiology and development has grown in recent years through research, clinical expertise, and global interdisciplinary expert collaboration. Therefore, the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) has revised the definition and stages of pressure injury. The revision was undertaken to incorporate the current understanding of the etiology of pressure injuries, as well as to clarify the anatomical features present or absent in each stage of injury. An NPUAP-appointed Task Force reviewed the literature and created drafts of definitions, which were then reviewed by stakeholders and the public, including clinicians, educators, and researchers around the world. Using a consensus-building methodology, these revised definitions were the focus of a multidisciplinary consensus conference held in April 2016. As a result of stakeholder and public input, along with the consensus conference, important changes were made and incorporated into the new staging definitions. The revised staging system uses the term injury instead of ulcer and denotes stages using Arabic numerals rather than Roman numerals. The revised definition of a pressure injury now describes the injuries as usually occurring over a bony prominence or under a medical or other device. The revised definition of a Stage 2 pressure injury seeks to clarify the difference between moisture-associated skin damage and injury caused by pressure and/or shear. The term suspected has been removed from the Deep Tissue Pressure Injury diagnostic label. Each definition now describes the extent of tissue loss present and the anatomical features that may or may not be present in the stage of injury. These important revisions reflect the methodical and collaborative approach used to examine the available evidence and incorporate current interdisciplinary clinical expertise into better defining the important phenomenon of pressure injury etiology and development.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Introduction to sample size determination and power analysis for clinical trials.

            The importance of sample size evaluation in clinical trials is reviewed and a general method is presented from which specific equations are derived for sample size determination or the analysis of power for a wide variety os statistical procedures. The method is discussed and illustrated in relation to the t test, tests for proportions, tests of survival time, and tests for correlations as they commonly occur in clinical trials. Most of the specific equations reduce to a simple general form for which tables are presented.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Medical device-related pressure ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Medicine (Baltimore)
                Medicine (Baltimore)
                MD
                Medicine
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                0025-7974
                1536-5964
                13 January 2023
                13 January 2023
                : 102
                : 2
                : e32679
                Affiliations
                [a ] Department of Anesthesiology, Aichi Gakuin University School of Dentistry 2-11 Suemori-dori, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
                [b ] Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
                [c ] Division of Dento-oral Anesthesiology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry 4-1 Seiryomachi, Aoba, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
                [d ] Department of Anesthesiology, Toyokawa City Hospital, 23 Yahatacho Noji, Toyokawa-city, Aichi, Japan.
                Author notes
                * Correspondence: Aiji Sato (Boku), Department of Anesthesilogy, Aichi Gakuin University School of Dentistry, 2-11 Suemori-dori, Chikusaku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8651, Japan (e-mail: bokuaiji@ 123456dpc.agu.ac.jp ).
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0182-2543
                Article
                00039
                10.1097/MD.0000000000032679
                9839254
                36637954
                37ec4414-fb7b-48f3-970a-309d3dd73042
                Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 26 November 2022
                : 22 December 2022
                : 27 December 2022
                Categories
                3300
                Research Article
                Clinical Trial/Experimental Study
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                nasal pressure injury,nasotracheal intubation,surgical tape

                Comments

                Comment on this article