22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Epinephrine in Anaphylaxis: Preclinical Study of Pharmacokinetics after Sublingual Administration of Taste-Masked Tablets for Potential Pediatric Use

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Epinephrine is a life-saving treatment in anaphylaxis. In community settings, a first-aid dose of epinephrine is injected from an auto-injector (EAI). Needle phobia highly contributes to EAI underuse, leading to fatalities—especially in children. A novel rapidly-disintegrating sublingual tablet (RDST) of epinephrine was developed in our laboratory as a potential alternative dosage form. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sublingual bioavailability of epinephrine 30 mg as a potential pediatric dose incorporated in our novel taste-masked RDST in comparison with intramuscular (IM) epinephrine 0.15 mg from EAI, the recommended and only available dosage form for children in community settings. We studied the rate and extent of epinephrine absorption in our validated rabbit model ( n = 5) using a cross-over design. The positive control was IM epinephrine 0.15 mg from an EpiPen Jr ®. The negative control was a placebo RDST. Tablets were placed under the tongue for 2 min. Blood samples were collected at frequent intervals and epinephrine concentrations were measured using HPLC with electrochemical detection. The mean ± SEM maximum plasma concentration ( C max) of 16.7 ± 1.9 ng/mL at peak time ( T max) of 21 min after sublingual epinephrine 30 mg did not differ significantly ( p > 0.05) from the C max of 18.8 ± 1.9 ng/mL at a T max of 36 min after IM epinephrine 0.15 mg. The C max of both doses was significantly higher than the C max of 7.5 ± 1.7 ng/mL of endogenous epinephrine after placebo. These taste-masked RDSTs containing a 30 mg dose of epinephrine have the potential to be used as an easy-to-carry, palatable, non-invasive treatment for anaphylactic episodes for children in community settings.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          World Allergy Organization anaphylaxis guidelines: summary.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The use of adrenaline autoinjectors by children and teenagers.

            Although adrenaline is recommended as first line treatment for anaphylaxis, it is often not utilized. There has been a debate about when adrenaline autoinjectors should be prescribed and how many should be dispensed. To see how many adrenaline autoinjectors were used during anaphylactic reactions and to determine why they were not used in situations where they were clinically indicated. Patients were recruited prospectively at 14 paediatric allergy clinics throughout UK. Participants completed a questionnaire covering demographic data, atopic status and details of allergic reactions in the previous year and reasons for using more than one device. A total of 969 patients were recruited of whom 466 (48.1%, 95% CI: 37.9-58.2) had had at least one reaction in the previous year; 245 (25.3%, 95% CI: 16.2-34.4) of these reactions were anaphylaxis. An adrenaline autoinjector was used by 41 (16.7%, 95% CI: 11.7-21.3) participants experiencing anaphylaxis. Thirteen participants received more than one dose of adrenaline, for nine of these a health professional gave at least one. The commonest reasons for using more than one were severe breathing difficulties (40%), lack of improvement with first dose (20%) and miss-firing (13.3%). The commonest reasons for not using adrenaline in anaphylaxis were 'thought adrenaline unnecessary' (54.4%) and 'unsure adrenaline necessary' (19.1%). Many with wheeze did not use their autoinjector. Adrenaline is used by only a minority of patients experiencing anaphylaxis in the community. Thirteen of the 41 patients with anaphylaxis who used their autoinjector needed another dose of adrenaline. Further research is needed to consider how to best encourage the usage of adrenaline when clinically indicated in anaphylaxis. © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Increasing Emergency Department Visits for Anaphylaxis, 2005-2014

              Anaphylaxis is a potentially life-threatening systemic allergic reaction. Studies suggest that the incidence of anaphylaxis is increasing; however, recent trends in emergency department (ED) visits for anaphylaxis in the United States have not been studied.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Pharmaceutics
                Pharmaceutics
                pharmaceutics
                Pharmaceutics
                MDPI
                1999-4923
                11 February 2018
                March 2018
                : 10
                : 1
                : 24
                Affiliations
                [1 ]College of Pharmacy, Qatar University, P.O. Box 2713 Doha, Qatar
                [2 ]College of Pharmacy, Health Professions Division, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33328, USA
                [3 ]College of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0T5, Canada; Keith.Simons@ 123456umanitoba.ca
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: orachid@ 123456qu.edu.qa (O.R.); mr.qalaji@ 123456nova.edu (M.R.-Q.); Tel.: +974-4403-5631 (O.R.); +1-(954)-262-1350 (M.R.-Q.)
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2364-3848
                Article
                pharmaceutics-10-00024
                10.3390/pharmaceutics10010024
                5874837
                29439456
                386a9869-1672-4f4e-bd26-f7ea1a56767b
                © 2018 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 22 November 2017
                : 12 January 2018
                Categories
                Article

                bioavailability,bioequivalence,intramuscular,auto-injector,sublingual delivery,rapidly-disintegrating,tablets,allergy,anaphylaxis,adrenaline,epinephrine

                Comments

                Comment on this article