1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Outcomes of long-acting injectable antipsychotics use in pregnancy: A literature review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND

          Women with a history of serious psychotic disorders are at increased risk of disease relapse during pregnancy. Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics have been widely used to improve adherence and prevent relapse in patients with various severe psychotic disorders, but there is a lack of high-quality data from previous research on the safety of LAI antipsychotics during pregnancy.

          AIM

          To summarize relevant data on maternal, pregnancy, neonatal, and developmental outcomes from published cases of LAI antipsychotic use in pregnancy.

          METHODS

          A literature search was performed through November 11, 2023, using three online databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. Case reports or case series that reported information about the outcomes of pregnancy in women who used LAI antipsychotics at any point in pregnancy, with available full texts, were included. Descriptive statistics, narrative summation, and tabulation of the extracted data were performed.

          RESULTS

          A total of 19 publications satisfied the inclusion criteria: 3 case series, 15 case reports, and 1 conference abstract. They reported the outcomes of LAI antipsychotic use in 74 women and 77 pregnancies. The use of second-generation LAI antipsychotics was reported in the majority ( n = 47; 61.0%) of pregnancies. First-generation LAI antipsychotics were administered during 30 pregnancies (39.0%). Most of the women (approximately 64%) had either satisfactory control of symptoms or no information about relapse, while approximately 12% of them had developed gestational diabetes mellitus. A minority of cases reported adverse outcomes such as stillbirth, spontaneous abortion, preterm birth, low birth weight, congenital anomalies, and neurological manifestations in newborns. However, there were no reports of negative long-term developmental outcomes.

          CONCLUSION

          Currently available data seem reassuring, but further well-designed studies are required to properly evaluate the risks and benefits of LAI antipsychotic use during pregnancy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references80

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Long-acting injectable versus oral antipsychotics for the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia: a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis of randomised, cohort, and pre–post studies

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            Antipsychotics and mortality in a nationwide cohort of 29,823 patients with schizophrenia

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effectiveness of Long-Acting Injectable vs Oral Antipsychotics in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis of Prospective and Retrospective Cohort Studies.

              Compared with oral antipsychotics (OAPs), long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) should improve medication adherence and reduce relapses in schizophrenia. However, meta-analyses of randomized trials and mirror-image studies yielded inconsistent results. Nonrandomized cohort studies with parallel comparisons of LAIs and OAPs offer a third design to examine this issue. We meta-analyzed cohort studies with ≥24 weeks duration and hospitalization data. Primary outcome was hospitalization rate, ie, number of hospitalizations per person-year. Secondary outcomes included hospitalization risk, ie, proportion of patients experiencing ≥1 hospitalizations, all-cause discontinuation, and total hospitalization days. Patient severity and/or chronicity at baseline was also meta-analyzed and explored as a potential effect size moderator. Altogether, 42 studies (n = 101 624; follow-up = 18.6 ± 10.0 mo) were meta-analyzed. LAIs were superior to OAPs regarding hospitalization rate (studies = 15, person-years = 68 009, rate ratio = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.78-0.93, P < .001) and all-cause discontinuations (studies = 10, n = 37 293, risk ratio = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.67-0.91, P = .001), but not regarding hospitalization risk (studies = 33, n = 51 733, risk ratio = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.84-1.00, P = .06), and hospitalization days (studies = 11, n = 21 328, Hedges' g = -0.05, 95% CI = -0.16 to 0.06, P = .39). Illness severity/chronicity was significantly greater in patients prescribed LAIs vs OAPs when all available information was pooled together (studies = 23, n = 61 806, Hedges' g = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.03-0.26, P = .01), but not when examined separately. In summary, this meta-analysis of cohort studies, which included patients that are broadly representative of clinical practice, indicates that LAIs are superior to OAPs. The lack of significant superiority of LAIs for hospitalization risk and hospital days needs to be interpreted in the context of naturalistic treatment selection with subsequently greater illness severity/chronicity in LAI-treated patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                World J Psychiatry
                WJP
                World Journal of Psychiatry
                Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
                2220-3206
                19 April 2024
                19 April 2024
                : 14
                : 4
                : 582-599
                Affiliations
                Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia. anapejcic201502@ 123456yahoo.com
                Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
                Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Clinical Center Kragujevac, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
                Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
                Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
                Clinic for Psychiatry, University Clinical Center Kragujevac, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
                Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Clinical Center Kragujevac, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
                Center for Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Research, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
                Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
                Pediatric Clinic, University Clinical Center Kragujevac, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
                Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
                Author notes

                Author contributions: Pejčić AV, Stefanović SM, Milosavljević MN, Janjić VS, Folić MM, Folić ND, and Milosavljević JZ contributed to conception, design, literature search, data analysis, drafting and editing of the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript.

                Corresponding author: Ana V Pejčić, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Svetozara Markovića 69, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia. anapejcic201502@ 123456yahoo.com

                Article
                jWJP.v14.i4.pg582 90429
                10.5498/wjp.v14.i4.582
                11036459
                38659600
                38bf4fc8-5cc6-4a1f-bc82-243ff236f62f
                ©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

                This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.

                History
                : 3 December 2023
                : 5 February 2024
                : 6 March 2024
                Categories
                Systematic Reviews

                antipsychotic agents,long-acting injectable,pregnancy,outcome,review

                Comments

                Comment on this article