Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Communities in charge of alcohol (CICA): a protocol for a stepped-wedge randomised control trial of an alcohol health champions programme

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Communities In Charge of Alcohol (CICA) takes an Asset Based Community Development (ABCD) approach to reducing alcohol harm. Through a cascade training model, supported by a designated local co-ordinator, local volunteers are trained to become accredited ‘Alcohol Health Champions’ to provide brief opportunistic advice at an individual level and mobilise action on alcohol availability at a community level. The CICA programme is the first time that a devolved UK region has attempted to coordinate an approach to building health champion capacity, presenting an opportunity to investigate its implementation and impact at scale. This paper describes the protocol for a stepped wedge randomised controlled trial of an Alcohol Health Champions programme in Greater Manchester which aims to strengthen the evidence base of ABCD approaches for health improvement and reducing alcohol-related harm.

          Methods

          A natural experiment that will examine the effect of CICA on area level alcohol-related hospital admissions, Accident and Emergency attendances, ambulance call outs, street-level crime and anti-social behaviour data. Using a stepped wedged randomised design (whereby the intervention is rolled out sequentially in a randomly assigned order), potential changes in health and criminal justice primary outcomes are analysed using mixed-effects log-rate models, differences-in-differences models and Bayesian structured time series models. An economic evaluation identifies the set-up and running costs of CICA using HM Treasury approved standardised methods and resolves cost-consequences by sector. A process evaluation explores the context, implementation and response to the intervention. Qualitative analyses utilise the Framework method to identify underlying themes.

          Discussion

          We will investigate: whether training lay people to offer brief advice and take action on licensing decisions has an impact on alcohol-related harm in local areas; the cost-consequences for health and criminal justice sectors, and; mechanisms that influence intervention outcomes. As well as providing evidence for the effectiveness of this intervention to reduce the harm from alcohol, this evaluation will contribute to broader understanding of asset based approaches to improve public health.

          Trial registration

          ISRCTN 81942890, date of registration 12/09/2017.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The effectiveness of limiting alcohol outlet density as a means of reducing excessive alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harms.

          The density of alcohol outlets in communities may be regulated to reduce excessive alcohol consumption and related harms. Studies directly assessing the control of outlet density as a means of controlling excessive alcohol consumption and related harms do not exist, but assessments of related phenomena are indicative. To assess the effects of outlet density on alcohol-related harms, primary evidence was used from interrupted time-series studies of outlet density; studies of the privatization of alcohol sales, alcohol bans, and changes in license arrangements-all of which affected outlet density. Most of the studies included in this review found that greater outlet density is associated with increased alcohol consumption and related harms, including medical harms, injury, crime, and violence. Primary evidence was supported by secondary evidence from correlational studies. The regulation of alcohol outlet density may be a useful public health tool for the reduction of excessive alcohol consumption and related harms.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Hours and days of sale and density of alcohol outlets: impacts on alcohol consumption and damage: a systematic review.

            The aim of this study was to examine recent research studies published from 2000 to 2008 focusing on availability of alcohol: hours and days of sale and density of alcohol outlets. Systematic review. Forty-four studies on density of alcohol outlets and 15 studies on hours and days of sale were identified through a systematic literature search. The majority of studies reviewed found that alcohol outlet density and hours and days of sale had an impact on one or more of the three main outcome variables, such as overall alcohol consumption, drinking patterns and damage from alcohol. Restricting availability of alcohol is an effective measure to prevent alcohol-attributable harm.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effect of community-based interventions on high-risk drinking and alcohol-related injuries.

              High-risk alcohol consumption patterns, such as binge drinking and drinking before driving, and underage drinking may be linked to traffic crashes and violent assaults in community settings. To determine the effect of community-based environmental interventions in reducing the rate of high-risk drinking and alcohol-related motor vehicle injuries and assaults. A longitudinal multiple time series of 3 matched intervention communities (northern California, southern California, and South Carolina) conducted from April 1992 to December 1996. Outcomes were assessed by 120 general population telephone surveys per month of randomly selected individuals in the intervention and comparison sites, traffic data on motor vehicle crashes, and emergency department surveys in 1 intervention-comparison pair and 1 additional intervention site. Mobilize the community; encourage responsible beverage service; reduce underage drinking by limiting access to alcohol; increase local enforcement of drinking and driving laws; and limit access to alcohol by using zoning. Self-reported alcohol consumption and driving after drinking; rates of alcohol-related crashes and assault injuries observed in emergency departments and admitted to hospitals. Population surveys revealed that the self-reported amount of alcohol consumed per drinking occasion declined 6% from 1.37 to 1. 29 drinks. Self-reported rate of "having had too much to drink" declined 49% from 0.43 to 0.22 times per 6-month period. Self-reported driving when "over the legal limit" was 51% lower (0. 77 vs 0.38 times) per 6-month period in the intervention communities relative to the comparison communities. Traffic data revealed that, in the intervention vs comparison communities, nighttime injury crashes declined by 10% and crashes in which the driver had been drinking declined by 6%. Assault injuries observed in emergency departments declined by 43% in the intervention communities vs the comparison communities, and all hospitalized assault injuries declined by 2%. A coordinated, comprehensive, community-based intervention can reduce high-risk alcohol consumption and alcohol-related injuries resulting from motor vehicle crashes and assaults. JAMA. 2000;284:2341-2347.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                P.A.Cook@salford.ac.uk
                S.C.Hargreaves@salford.ac.uk
                E.J.Burns@salford.ac.uk
                Frank.devocht@bristol.ac.uk
                Steve.parrott@york.ac.uk
                M.Coffey@salford.ac.uk
                Suzanne.Audrey@bristol.ac.uk
                C.M.Ure1@salford.ac.uk
                Paul.Duffy@phe.gov.uk
                David.Ottiwell@greatermanchester-ca.gov.uk
                KKenth@rsph.org.uk
                P.A.Cook@salford.ac.uk
                K.Ardern@wiganmbc.gov.uk
                Journal
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2458
                19 April 2018
                19 April 2018
                2018
                : 18
                : 522
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0460 5971, GRID grid.8752.8, School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, ; Manchester, UK
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0460 5971, GRID grid.8752.8, School of Health & Society, University of Salford, ; Manchester, UK
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7603, GRID grid.5337.2, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, ; Bristol, UK
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9668, GRID grid.5685.e, School of Health Sciences, University of York, ; York, UK
                [5 ]Public Health England North West, Manchester, UK
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0105 1617, GRID grid.434710.5, Greater Manchester Combined Authority, ; Manchester, UK
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2248 733X, GRID grid.421649.c, Royal Society of Public Health, ; London, UK
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0460 5971, GRID grid.8752.8, Fallowfield Community Guardians c/o School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, ; Manchester, UK
                [9 ]Wigan Council, Manchester, Wigan UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6435-8050
                Article
                5410
                10.1186/s12889-018-5410-0
                5909208
                29673337
                38fed5fe-a189-43b7-b945-3cb42261733c
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 15 February 2018
                : 5 April 2018
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Public health
                alcohol,public health,asset based community development,brief intervention,licensing,dark logic,community-based prevention

                Comments

                Comment on this article