6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinicopathologic Features of Submucosal Papillary Gastric Cancer Differ from Those of Other Differentiated-Type Histologies

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background/Aims

          Papillary gastric cancer (GC) is classified as differentiated adenocarcinoma, together with well-differentiated (WD) and moderately differentiated (MD) adenocarcinoma. This study evaluated the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in submucosal (SM) invasive papillary GC compared with other differentiated early GC types.

          Methods

          This retrospective study involved three tertiary hospitals and enrolled 1,798 lesions with differentiated SM invasive GC treated with curative gastrectomy between March 2001 and December 2012. All pathology slides were reviewed, and clinicopathologic findings associated with LNM, including tumor size, location, gross type, ulceration, depth and width of SM invasion, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI), were analyzed.

          Results

          The proportion of SM papillary GC was 2.8% (n=51). SM papillary GC was associated with larger tumor size and deeper and wider SM invasion than other differentiated GC types. LNM was significantly higher in the papillary type than in the MD and WD types. LNM was found in 27.5% of SM papillary GC patients (WD 9.0%, MD 21.2%). LVI was the only significant risk factor for LNM in SM papillary GC. The depth or width of SM invasion was not associated with LNM in papillary GC. Lower third location or elevated gross appearance was significantly associated with LVI.

          Conclusions

          SM papillary GC had the highest LNM rate, with features different from those of other differentiated SM invasive GCs. The treatment strategy for SM papillary GC should be carefully approached, especially for lesions located in the lower third or of the elevated gross type.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition.

          (2011)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            THE TWO HISTOLOGICAL MAIN TYPES OF GASTRIC CARCINOMA: DIFFUSE AND SO-CALLED INTESTINAL-TYPE CARCINOMA. AN ATTEMPT AT A HISTO-CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION.

            P LAUREN (1965)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Update on the paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract.

              (2005)
              Neoplastic lesions in the digestive-tract mucosa are termed "superficial" when the depth of invasion is limited to the mucosa and submucosa. The endoscopic appearance has a predictive value for invasion into the submucosa, which is critical for the risk of nodal metastases. The endoscopic morphology of superficial lesions can be assessed with a standard video endoscope after spraying of a dye--an iodine-potassium iodide solution for the stratified squamous epithelium, or an indigo carmine solution for the columnar epithelium. In 2002, a workshop was held in Paris to explore the relevance of the Japanese classification. The conclusions were revised in 2003 in Osaka in relation to the definition of the subtypes used in endoscopy and the evaluation of the depth of invasion into the submucosa. In Japan, the description of advanced cancer in the digestive-tract mucosa using types 1 - 4 is supplemented by a type 0 when the endoscopic appearance is that of a superficial lesion. Type 0 is divided into three categories: protruding (0 - I), nonprotruding and nonexcavated (0 - II), and excavated (0 - III). Type 0 - II lesions are then subdivided into slightly elevated (IIa), flat (IIb), or depressed (IIc). Nonprotruding depressed lesions are associated with a higher risk of submucosal invasion. After endoscopic resection, invasion into the submucosa is an important criterion for the necessity of additional surgical resection. Micrometer analysis of the depth of invasion in the specimen is more precise, and distinct cut-off limits have been established in the esophagus, stomach, and large bowel. The morphology of superficial and nonprotruding neoplastic lesions is relevant to the prognosis. Following endoscopic detection, the lesions are analyzed using chromoendoscopy and assigned a subtype of the type 0 classification. The choice between endoscopic or surgical treatment is based on this description.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Gut Liver
                Gut Liver
                Gut and Liver
                Editorial Office of Gut and Liver
                1976-2283
                2005-1212
                15 January 2021
                17 April 2020
                : 15
                : 1
                : 44-52
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
                [2 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
                [3 ]Department of Pathology, Center for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
                [4 ]Department of Pathology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
                [5 ]St. Maria Pathology Laboratory, Busan, Korea
                [6 ]Departments of Surgery, Center for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
                [7 ]Departments of Internal Medicine, Center for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
                [8 ]Departments of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
                [9 ]Departments of Pathology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
                [10 ]Departments of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8970-2444
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9198-3326
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3435-3301
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7641-1509
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5935-9777
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8339-9824
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4386-6886
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2292-5584
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8800-6906
                Article
                gnl-15-1-44
                10.5009/gnl19328
                7817937
                32295332
                39732ca4-6f82-4801-9d30-2abb2676a83d
                Copyright © Gut and Liver.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 2 October 2019
                : 19 January 2020
                : 21 January 2020
                Categories
                Original Article
                Alimentary Tract

                Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                stomach neoplasm,adenocarcinoma, papillary,lymphatic metastasis,risk factors

                Comments

                Comment on this article