Noise dosimeter for monitoring exposure to impulse noise

A review of the last 10 years of research on impulse noise reveals certain insights and perspectives on the biological and audiological effects of exposures to impulse noise. First, impulse noise may damage the cochlea by direct mechanical processes. Second, after exposure to impulse noise, hearing may recover in an erratic, nonmonotonic pattern. Third, even though the existing damage-risk criteria evaluate impulse noise in terms of level, duration, and number, often parameters such as temporal pattern, waveform, and rise time are also important in the production of a hearing loss. Fourth, the effects of impulse noise are often inconsistent with the principle of the equal energy hypothesis. Fifth, impulse noise can interact with background continuous noise to produce greater hearing loss than would have been predicted by the simple sum of the individual noises.

In order to provide insight into the mechanisms that operate in the ear when it is exposed to intense sounds, time and frequency domain mathematical models of the ear including significant nonlinearities in the middle ear were developed to trace energy flow from the free field to the inner ear and ultimately allow the calculation of basilar membrane displacement and a consequent hazard function. These models match the ear's behavior at low intensities and also reproduce many of the features of the data on hearing hazard from intense impulses. They provide critical insights into the loss mechanisms, suggest new strategies for protecting hearing as well as reducing hazard at the source and could also serve as a framework for a new, accurate, theoretically based method for rating hazard from intense sounds.

In spite of strict safety regulations concerning firearm shooting, several hundred conscripts still suffer acute acoustical trauma (AAT) in the Finnish Defence Forces (FDF) every year, resulting in symptoms such as tinnitus and/or hearing impairment. The causes leading to AAT, causative weapons and mode and level of hearing protection were analysed to find out why so many AATs still occur in the FDF. The material consisted of 119 patients of the total 163 AAT patients treated at the Central Military Hospital during the year 2000. In 87.5% of cases, the AATs occurred in unprotected ears. The most common causative weapon was the assault rifle. Most of the AATs occurred during combat training in the field. Immediately after the AAT. 46.7% of conscripts had hearing impairment and 94.2% tinnitus. Hearing loss, tinnitus or both were experienced by 45% of conscripts at the last follow-up. Careful planning of training exercises could probably prevent some but not all AATs.